Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Paradigms and Paradoxes of Sigma Metrics in the Analytical Phase of the Medical Diagnostic Laboratory

  • REVIEW ARTICLE
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

William Osler very aptly described healthcare in his statement “Medicine is a science of uncertainty and an art of probability”. Since 70% of patient related medical decisions are based on reports from the medical diagnostic laboratory, the latter must implement good laboratory practices and stringent quality control measures to minimize uncertainty. Towards this, medical diagnostic laboratories use the sigma metric statistical tool to assess and maintain their quality performance. However, it needs to be emphasized that these tools were formulated for the manufacturing industry and hence, should be adapted to the medical laboratory’s environment. This review is to familiarize the laboratorians with the basis of these tools and where one may need to deviate from their conventional acceptance and utilization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osler W. The historical development and relative value of laboratory and clinical methods in diagnosis. The evolution of the idea of experiment in medicine. Trans Congress Am Phys Surg. 1907;7:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human, Building a safer health system. Washington: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Silva Pontes EA. A brief historical overview of the Gaussian curve: from Abraham De Moivre to Johann Carl Friedrich Gauss. Int J Eng Sci Invent. 2018;7(6):28–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer H. The hypothesis of elementary errors. In: A history of the central limit theorem. Sources and studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences. Springer, New York. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87857-7_3

  5. Six Sigma Daily, February, 2018. https://www.sixsigmadaily.com/remembering-joseph-juran-quality-improvement/Februar/2018.

  6. Frederick Winslow Taylor. Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Brothers Publishers; 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coskun A, Serteser M, Unsal I. Sigma metric revisited: True known mistakes. Biochemia Medica. 2019;29(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.010902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar V, Verma P, Muthukumaar V. The performances of process capability indices in the six-sigma competitiveness levels. In: Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management. Bandung, Indonesia, March 6–8, 2018.

  9. CDC. Centre for Global Health. Module 6: QC Basic Rules and Charts. https://slideplayer.com/slide/2512279/

  10. Bayat H. Expected long-term defect rate of analytical performance in the medical laboratory: assured sigma versus observed sigma. Biochem Med. 2018;28(2): 020101. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2018.020101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Callum GF. Quality Specifications for Precision, Bias, and Total Allowable Error. In “Biological variation: From Principles to Practice”. Ed Fraser. AACC Press. 2001. Coskun A. Wrong sigma metrics causes chaos. J Lab Med 2022; 46(2):143–145.

  12. Westgard J. Westgard Sigma Rules. In Tools, Technologies and Training in Healthcare Laboratories. https://www.westgard.com/lessons/westgard-rules/58-westgard-rules/661-westgard-sigma-rules.html

  13. Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, Coskun A, Gonzales-Lao E, Diaz-Garzon J et al. The EFLM biological variation database. https://biologicalvariation.eu/

  14. Bartlett WA, Braga F, Carobene A, Coşkun A, Prusa R, Fernandez-Calle P, et al. Biological variation working group, European federation of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM). A checklist for critical appraisal of studies of biological variation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):879–85. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-1127.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coskun A. Wrong sigma metrics causes chaos. J Lab Med. 2022;46(2):143–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Westgard S. Advanced Quality Management/Six Sigma. ‘Tools, Technologies and Training for Healthcare Laboratories’. www.westgard.com

  17. Harry M, Schroeder R. Six sigma: the breakthrough management strategy revolutionizing the World’s Top Corporations in Currency. 1999.

  18. https://www.smartsheet.com/all-about-six-sigma

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to acknowledge the inputs of Mr. Ramdhir and Mr. Vipul (Abbott Diagnostics) for their help and support in compiling the sigma metrics data from our laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FRC Path Department of Biochemistry, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India

    Seema Bhargava

Authors
  1. Seema Bhargava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Bhargava.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bhargava, S. The Paradigms and Paradoxes of Sigma Metrics in the Analytical Phase of the Medical Diagnostic Laboratory. Ind J Clin Biochem (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-024-01229-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-024-01229-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation