Skip to main content
Log in

Study of Variables Affecting Critical Value Notification in a Laboratory Catering to Tertiary Care Hospital

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During post-analytical phase, critical value notification to responsible caregiver in a timely manner has potential to improve patient safety which requires cooperative efforts between laboratory personnel and caregivers. It is widely accepted by hospital accreditors that ineffective notification can lead to diagnostic errors that potentially harm patients and are preventable. The objective of the study was to assess the variables affecting critical value notification, their role in affecting it’s quality and approaches to improve it. In the present study 1,187 critical values were analysed in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory catering to tertiary care hospital for neuropsychiatric diseases. During 25 months of study period, we evaluated critical value notification with respect to clinical care area, caregiver to whom it was notified and timeliness of notification. During the study period (25 months), the laboratory obtained 1,279 critical values in clinical chemistry. The analytes most commonly notified were sodium and potassium (20.97 & 20.8 % of total critical results). Analysis of critical value notification versus area of care showed that critical value notification was high in ICU and emergency area followed by inpatients and 64.61 % critical values were notified between 30 and 120 min after receiving the samples. It was found that failure to notify the responsible caregiver in timely manner represent an important patient safety issue and may lead to diagnostic errors. The major area of concern are notification of critical value for outpatient samples, incompleteness of test requisition forms regarding illegible writing, lack of information of treating physician and location of test ordering and difficulty in contacting the responsible caregiver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piva E, Plebani M. Interpretative reports and critical values. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:52–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations: National Patient Safety Goals. Available at: http://www.jcaho.org/accredited+organisations/patient+safety/npsg.htm.

  3. The Joint Commission. National Patient Safety Goals: 2013 National Patient Safety Goals. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals. Accessed 16 July 2013.

  4. ISO 15189. Medical laboratories: particular requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation; 2012.

  5. College of American Pathologists. Association and laboratory improvement. http://www.cap.org/apps/cap.portal; 2009.

  6. Howanitz PJ, Steindel SJ, Heard NV. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study in 623 institutions. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:663–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Elisa P, Sciacovelli L, Laposata M, Plebani M. Assessment of critical values policies in Italian institutions: comparison with the US situation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2010;48:461–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, Lewandrowski KB. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical centre. Am J Pathol. 2006;125:758–64.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wager EA, Friedberg RC, Souers R, Stakovic AK. Critical values comparison. A college of American Pathologists Q-Probes Survey of 163 clinical laboratories. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2007;131:1769–75.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Plibani M, Zaninotto M, Sciacovelli L, Piva E, Saw S. Critical laboratory results: communication is just one of the problems. Am J Clin Pathol. 2012;137:164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Parl F, O leary MF, Kaiser AB, Paulett JM, Statnikova K, Schultz EK. Implementation of closed-loop reporting system for critical values and clinical communication in compliance with goals of the joint commission. Clin Chem. 2010;56(3):417–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachna Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, R., Chhillar, N. & Tripathi, C.B. Study of Variables Affecting Critical Value Notification in a Laboratory Catering to Tertiary Care Hospital. Ind J Clin Biochem 30, 89–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-013-0409-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-013-0409-x

Keywords

Navigation