Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Old but Still Relevant: High Resolution Electrophoresis and Immunofixation in Multiple Myeloma

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction: High resolution electrophoresis (HRE) and immunofixation (IFX) of serum and urine are integral to the diagnostic work-up of multiple myeloma. Unusual electrophoresis patterns are common and may be misinterpreted. Though primarily the responsibility of the hematopathologist, clinicians who are responsible for managing myelomas may benefit from knowledge of these. In this review article we intend to discuss the patterns and importance of electrophoresis in present day scenario. Methods: Patterns of HRE and IFX seen in our laboratory over the past 15 years were studied. Results: Monoclonal proteins are seen on HRE as sharply defined bands, sometimes two, lying from γ- to α-globulin regions on a background of normal, increased or decreased polyclonal γ-globulins, showing HRE to be a rapid and dependable method of detecting M-protein in serum or urine. Immunofixation complements HRE and due to its greater sensitivity, is able to pick up small or light chain bands, not apparent on electrophoresis, including biclonal disease even when electrophoresis shows only one M-band. Special features liable to misinterpretation are discussed. Familiarity with the interpretation of the varied patterns seen in health and disease is essential for providing dependable laboratory support in the management of multiple myeloma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harding SJ, Mead GP, Bradwell AR, Berard AM (2009) Serum free light chain immunoassay as an adjunct to serum protein electrophoresis and immunofixation electrophoresis in the detection of multiple myeloma and other B-cell malignancies. Clin Chem Lab Med 47:302–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, Miguel JS, Ludwig H, Hajek R et al (2009) International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 23:215–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, Blade J, Barlogie B, Anderson K, Gertz M, Dimopoulos M, Westin J, Sonneveld P, Ludwig H, Gahrton G, Beksac M, Crowley J, Belch A, Boccadaro M, Cavo M, Turesson I, Joshua D, Vesole D, Kyle R, Alexanian R, Tricot G, Attal M, Merlini G, Powles R, Richardson P, Shimizu K, Tosi P, Morgan G, Rajkumar SV (2006) International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 20:1467–1473

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Anand M, Kumar R, Sharma OD (2004) Economical choices in setting up a diagnostic myeloma laboratory. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 47:506–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keren DF, Warren JS (1992) Diagnostic immunology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karcher RE, Nuttal KL (2001) Electrophoresis. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER (eds) Teitz’s fundamentals of clinical chemistry. WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 121–132

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riches P (1990) Immunochemical investigation of lymphoid malignancies. In: Gooi HC, Chapel RC (eds) Clinical immunology: a practical approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–138

    Google Scholar 

  8. Keren DF (1999) Procedures for the evaluation of monoclonal immunoglobulins. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:126–132

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hardisty RM, Weatherall DJ (1982) Blood and it disorders, 2nd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keren DF, Alexanian R, Goeken JA, Gore Vic PD, Kyle RA, Tomar RH (1999) Guidelines for clinical and laboratory evaluation of patients with monoclonal gammopathies. Arch Path Lab Med 123:106–107

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rajkumar SV, Miguel JS, Harousseau JL (2009) Guidelines for the Uniform Reporting of Clinical Trials: Report of the 2009 International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel I. http://www.mw-delhi09.com/spargoDocs/Consensuspanelone.pdf

  12. Bradwell AR, Carr-Smith HD, Mead GP, Tang LX, Showell PJ, Drayson MT, Drew R (2001) Highly sensitive, automated immunoassay for immunoglobulin free light chains in serum and urine. Clin Chem 47:673–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bird J, Owen R, D’Sa S, et al (2010) BCSH and UKMF guidelines on the management and diagnosis of multiple myeloma. http://www.bcshguidelines.com/documents/MYELOMA_Mngmt_GUIDELINE_REVISION_Sept_2010.pdf

  14. Kyle RA, Greipp PR (1978) The laboratory investigation of monoclonal gammopathies. Mayo Clin Proc 53:719–739

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jenkins MA (2009) Serum and urine electrophoresis for detection and identification of monoclonal proteins. Clin Biochem Rev 30:119–122

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Attaelmannan M, Levinson SS (2000) Understanding and identifying monoclonal gammopathies. Clin Chem 46(8 Pt 2):1230–1238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallemuchikkal U, Gorevic PD (1999) Evaluation of cryoglobulins. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:119–125

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lock RJ, Virgo PF, Unsworth DJ (2008) Pitfalls in the performance and interpretation of clinical immunology tests. J Clin Pathol 61:1236–1242

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyle RA (1999) Sequence of testing for monoclonal gammopathies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 123:114–118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shustik C, Bergsagel DE, Pruzanski W (1976) Kappa and lambda light chain disease: survival rates and clinical manifestations. Blood 48:41–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Anand M, Singh S, Kumar R, Sharma OD (2004) Value of immunofixation on serum in light-chain myeloma. Ann Clin Biochem 41:501–502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Franklin EC (1975) Electrophoresis and immunoelectrophoresis in diagnosis of dysproteinemias. In: Vyas GN, Stites DP, Brecher G (eds) Laboratory diagnosis of immunologic disorders. Grune and Stratton, New York, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  23. Blade J, Lust JA, Kyle RA (1994) Immunoglobulin D multiple myeloma: presenting features, response to therapy and survival in a series of 53 cases. J Clin Oncol 12:2398–2404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pandey S, Kyle RA (2013) Unusual myelomas: a review of IgD and IgE variants. Oncology (Williston Park) 27:798–803

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kuliszkiewicz-Janus M, Zimny A, Sokolska V, Saşiadek M, Kuliczkowski K (2005) Immunoglobulin D myeloma—problems with diagnosing and staging (own experience and literature review). Leuk Lymphoma 46:1029–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jancelewicz Z, Takatsuki K, Sugai S, Pruzanski W (1975) IgD multiple myeloma. Review of 133 cases. Arch Intern Med 135:87–93

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kairemo KJ, Lindberg M, Prytz M (1999) IgE myeloma: a case presentation and a review of the literature. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 59:451–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abraham RS, Charlesworth MC, Owen BA, Benson LM, Katzmann JA, Reeder CB et al (2002) Trimolecular complexes of lambda light chain dimers in serum of a patient with multiple myeloma. Clin Chem 48:1805–1811

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vladutiu AO, Kohli RK (1977) Double spike in the electropherogram of myeloma serum, from Bence Jones protein. Clin Chem 23:140–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kyle RA (1975) Multiple myeloma: review of 869 cases. Mayo Clin Proc 50:29–40

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Grateful thanks are due to Professors RA Kyle and PR Greipp and other members of the Dyspro Row at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA, for help received in setting up our laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Chopra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Misra, A., Mishra, J., Chandramohan, J. et al. Old but Still Relevant: High Resolution Electrophoresis and Immunofixation in Multiple Myeloma. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus 32, 10–17 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-015-0605-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-015-0605-3

Keywords

Navigation