Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of disc golf drivers’ aerodynamic characteristics using Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes computational fluid dynamics

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research manuscripts in sports (disc golf, cycling, and motorsports in particular) and the automotive industry have demonstrated the need for improved predictive capabilities of Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes aerodynamic simulations. This paper presents work performed to improve these capabilities for golf discs. The relatively new Lag elliptic blending kε turbulence model and the well-established kω Shear Stress Transport model were trialed in golf disc computational fluid dynamics analyses in this study. The predictive capabilities of the Lag elliptic blending kε turbulence model were improved by modifying its closure coefficient values. Closure coefficient values were taken from a study correlating the standard kε model to test flow cases. Turbulent kinetic energy increased for the Lag elliptic blending kε turbulence model simulations. The increase in turbulent kinetic energy produced a more energetic wake and evidence of more accurate flow structures. As an apparent result, the force and surface pressure coefficients of the Lag elliptic blending kε turbulence model simulations matched the experimental data more closely than the kω Shear Stress Transport model. Sports researchers, sports equipment designers, motorsports engineers, and automotive engineers may find this research helpful since it has been shown that many Reynolds Average Navier Stoke turbulence models underpredict turbulent kinetic energy and overpredict wake size for bluff bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data presented in this paper will be avaiable upon request.

References

  1. Current Disc Golf Equipment Manufacturer Guidelines, Professional Disc Golf Association (2021) https://www.pdga.com/technical-standards/manufacturer-guidelines. Accessed 22 Dec 2022

  2. PDGA Approved Disc Golf Discs, Professional Disc Golf Association (2022) https://www.pdga.com/technical-standards/equipment-certification/discs. Accessed 22 Dec 2022

  3. Goff JE (2013) A review of recent research into aerodynamics of sport projectiles. Sports Eng 16:137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah K, Shakya R, Mittal S (2019) Aerodynamic forces on projectiles used in various sports. Phys Fluids 31:015106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moriyama K, Okanaga H (2023) Effects of golf ball dimple surface occupancy, volume ratio and depth on aerodynamic characteristics during rotation. Sports Eng 26:10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00400-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bush RH, Chyczewski TS, Duraisamy K, Eisfeld B, Rumsey CL, Smith BR (2019) Recommendations for future efforts in RANS modeling and simulation. In: AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum, p 0317

  7. Fu C, Uddin M, Robinson AC (2018) Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of flow over a NASCAR Gen 6 racecar. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 176:98–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fu C, Uddin M, Robinson C, Guzman A, Bailey D (2017) Turbulence models and model closure coefficients sensitivity of NASCAR Racecar RANS CFD aerodynamic predictions. SAE Int J Passeng Cars Mech Syst 10:330–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu C, Bounds CP, Selent C, Uddin M (2019) Turbulence modeling effects on the aerodynamic characterizations of a NASCAR Generation 6 racecar subject to yaw and pitch changes. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng 233:3600–3620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu C, Bounds C, Uddin M, Selent C (2019) Fine tuning the SST k-ω turbulence model closure coefficients for improved NASCAR cup racecar aerodynamic predictions. SAE Int J Adv Curr Pract Mobil 1:1226–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Higuchi H, Goto Y, Hiramoto R, Meisel I (2000) Rotating flying disks and formation of trailing vortices. In: 18th applied aerodynamics conference, p 4001

  12. Lissaman P, Hubbard M (2010) Maximum range of flying discs. Procedia Eng 2:2529–2535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lukes RA, Hart JH, Potts J, Haake SJ (2014) A CFD analysis of flow around a disc. Procedia Eng 72:685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones WP, Launder BE (1972) The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int J Heat Mass Transf 15:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shih TH, Liou WW, Shabbir A, Yang Z, Zhu J (1994) A New ke Eddy Viscosity Model for High Reynolds Number Turbulent Flows-Model Development and Validation NASA Technical Memorandum 106721, ICOMP-94–21, CMOTT-94–6

  16. Wilcox DC (1998) Turbulence modeling for CFD, DCW industries La Canada

  17. Davis PL, Rinehimer AT, Uddin M (2012) A comparison of RANS-based turbulence modeling for flow over a wall-mounted square cylinder. In: 20th annual conference of the CFD society of Canada

  18. Zhang C, Bounds CP, Foster L, Uddin M (2019) Turbulence modeling effects on the CFD predictions of flow over a detailed full-scale sedan vehicle. Fluids 4:148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kamaruddin N, Potts J, Crowther W (2018) Aerodynamic performance of flying discs. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-09-2016-0143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kamaruddin NM (2011) Dynamics and performance of flying discs. The University of Manchester (United Kingdom)

  21. Potts JR, Masters D (2015) Validation of the aerodynamic loading on basic flying disc geometries derived from CFD simulations. Procedia Eng 112:400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32:1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Potts J (2005) Disc-wing aerodynamics. PhD Dissertation, University of Manchester

  24. Giljarhus KET, Gooding MT, Njærheim J (2022) Disc golf trajectory modelling combining computational fluid dynamics and rigid body dynamics. Sports Eng 25:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ashton N, West A, Lardeau S, Revell A (2016) Assessment of RANS and DES methods for realistic automotive models. Comput Fluids 128:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Poroseva SV, Bézard H (2001) On ability of standard ke model to simulate aerodynamic turbulent flows. CFD Journal 9:464–470

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lardeau S, Billard F (2016) Development of an elliptic-blending lag model for industrial applications. In: 54th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, p 1600

  28. Manceau R, Hanjalić K (2002) Elliptic blending model: a new near-wall Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Phys Fluids 14:744–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Siemens Digital Industries Software (2018) Simcenter STAR-CCM+ User Guide version 13.04. https://www.plm.automation.siemens.com/global/en/products/simcenter/STAR-CCM.html

  30. Lukes RA, Hart JH, Chin SB, Haake S (2005) Validation of computational fluid dynamics applied to aerodynamic flows in sport with specific application to cycling. In: Subic A, Ujihashi S (eds.) Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific congress on sports technology. Australasian sports technology alliance, p 286–291

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel Honeycutt or Mesbah Uddin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This research did not involve human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Honeycutt, D., Uddin, M. Prediction of disc golf drivers’ aerodynamic characteristics using Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes computational fluid dynamics. Sports Eng 26, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00420-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-023-00420-w

Keywords

Navigation