Skip to main content
Log in

A continuous analytical shaft model for fast dynamic simulation of the golf swing

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The intricate physical interaction between the golfer and golf club has driven the development of numerous dynamic golf swing models over the past few decades. Within these golf swing models, the shaft is represented analytically, and simplifications are often made to strike a balance between the demanding computation required for simulating full swings and running optimizations. Despite recent progress in modeling golfer biomechanics, there has been a marked lack of experimental validation surrounding the dynamic behaviour of the analytical shaft models used in golf swing simulations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the simulated behaviour of an advanced, continuously-parameterized analytical golf shaft model using experimental data collected in constrained mechanical property experiments as well as golf swing motion capture experiments. In the constrained experiments, the model predicted the experimental shaft’s static deflection and bending frequency within a relative error of 1%. In simulations of full swings, the model authentically replicated the unique bending patterns for each of the 20 golfers in the motion capture experiment. The root mean square errors for the shaft droop, lag, and twist angles for all swings (\(N=200\)) were \(1.14^{\circ }\), \(0.83^{\circ }\), and \(0.85^{\circ }\), respectively, and the clubhead speed at the time of impact was predicted to within \(-\,2.9\) to 0.6%. Empowered by symbolic computation, the model is computationally efficient enough for fast simulations of full swings (\(<1\) s CPU time) on a desktop computer, thereby enabling golf shaft design optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Nominal stiffness rating as determined by the shaft manufacturer.

  2. \(s_\mathrm{w}=\sqrt{\frac{\sum s_i^2}{n}}\), where \(s_i^2\) are the variances of measurements on each subject and n is the number of subjects.

  3. The YXZ Cardanic sequence was chosen by means of trial and error. Other sequences were tested and issues arose with gimbal lock.

References

  1. MacKenzie SJ, Sprigings EJ (2009) Understanding the role of shaft stiffness in the golf swing. Sports Eng 12:13–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0028-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wood P, Henrikson E, Broadie C (2018) The influence of face angle and club path on the resultant launch angle of a golf ball. In: MDPI proceedings. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Penner R (2002) The physics of golf. Rep Prog Phys 66:131–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Broadie M (2014) Every shot counts: using the revolutionary strokes gained approach to improve your golf performance and strategy. Avery, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burden AM, Grimshaw PN, Wallace ES (1998) Hip and shoulder rotations during the golf swing of sub-10 handicap players. J Sport Sci 16:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404198366876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Myers J, Lephart S, Tsai Y et al (2008) The role of upper torso and pelvis rotation in driving performance during the golf swing. J Sport Sci 26:181–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410701373543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng N, Barrentine SW, Fleisig GS, Andrews JR (2008) Kinematic analysis of swing in pro and amateur golfers. Int J Sports Med 29:487–493. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-989229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Neal RJ, Wilson BD (1985) 3D kinematics and kinetics of the golf swing. Int J Sport Biomech 1:221–232. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsb.1.3.221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nesbit S (2005) A three dimensional kinematic and kinetic study of the golf swing. J Sport Sci Med 4:499–517

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nesbit S, Serrano M (2005) Work and power analysis of the golf swing. J Sport Sci Med 4:520–533

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lampsa MA (1975) Maximizing distance of the golf drive: an optimal control study. J Dyn Syst T ASME 97:362–367. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3426951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sprigings EJ, Neal RJ (2000) An insight into the importance of wrist torque in driving the golfball: a simulation study. J Appl Biomech 16:356–366. https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.16.4.356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. MacKenzie SJ, Sprigings EJ (2009) A three-dimensional forward dynamics model of the golf swing. Sports Eng 11:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0020-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Balzerson D, Banerjee J, McPhee J (2016) A three-dimensional forward dynamic model of the golf swing optimized for ball carry distance. Sports Eng 19:237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-016-0197-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McNally W, McPhee J (2018) Dynamic optimization of the golf swing using a six degree-of-freedom biomechanical model. In: MDPI proceedings. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McNally W, McPhee J, Henrikson E (2018) The golf shaft’s influence on clubhead-ball impact dynamics. In: MDPI proceedings. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2060245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cheong SK, Kang KW, Jeong SK (2006) Evaluation of the mechanical performance of golf shafts. Eng Fail Anal 13:464–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2004.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friswell MI, Mottershead JE, Smart MG (1998) Dynamic models of golf clubs. Sports Eng 1:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2687.1998.00001.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanaka K, Teranishi Y, Ujihashi S (2010) Experimental and finite element analyses of a golf ball colliding with a simplified club during a two-dimensional swing. Procedia Eng 2:3249–3254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jorgensen T (1970) On the dynamics of the swing of a golf club. Am J Phys 38:644–651. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1976419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sprigings EJ, MacKenzie SJ (2002) Examining the delayed release in the golf swing using computer simulation. Sports Eng 5:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1460-2687.2002.00094.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coleman SG, Rankin AJ (2005) A three-dimensional examination of the planar nature of the golf swing. J Sports Sci 23:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410410001730179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Butler JH, Winfield DC (1994) The dynamic performance of the golf shaft during the downswing. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally MR (eds) Science and Golf II: proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, E & F Spon, London, pp 259–264

  24. MacKenzie SJ, Henrikson EM, MacDonald HL, Hillier TW (2018) The influence of golf shaft torque on clubhead kinematics and ball flight. J Sports Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2018.1479133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sandhu S, Millard M, McPhee J, Brekke D (2010) 3D dynamic modelling and simulation of a golf drive. Procedia Eng 2:3243–3248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. USGA (2006) Procedure for measuring the moment of inertia of golf clubheads. https://www.usga.org/content/dam/usga/pdf/Equipment/TPX3005-procedure-for-measuring-the-moment-of-inertia_of_golf_clubheads.pdf. Accessed Sept 2018

  27. Shi P, McPhee J, Heppler GR (2001) A deformation field for Euler–Bernoulli beams with applications to flexible multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 5:79–104. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026433909962

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmitke C, McPhee J (2008) Using linear graph theory and the principle of orthogonality to model multibody, multi-domain systems. Adv Eng Inform 22:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2007.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shi P, McPhee J, Heppler G (2001) Polynomial shape functions and numerical methods for flexible multibody dynamics. Mech Struct Mach 29:43–64. https://doi.org/10.1081/SME-100000002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Banerjee J, McPhee J (2015) Acausal modelling for dynamic multibody simulation of damped three-dimensional flexible beams. In: Floryan, JM et al (eds) Proceedings of the 25th Canadian congress of applied mechanics, pp 546–549

  31. Betzler NF, Slater C, Strangwood M et al (2011) The static and dynamic stiffness behaviour of composite golf shafts and their constituent materials. Sports Eng 14:27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-011-0068-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Joyce C, Burnett A, Ball K (2010) Methodological considerations for the 3D measurement of the X-factor and lower trunk movement in golf. Sports Biomech 9:206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2010.516446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. MacKenzie SJ, Sprigings EJ (2009) Understanding the mechanisms of shaft deflection in the golf swing. Sports Eng 12:68–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-010-0034-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. MacKenzie SJ, Boucher DE (2016) The influence of golf shaft stiffness on grip and clubhead kinematics. J Sport Sci 35:105–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2016.1157262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 327:307–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Golf Digest (2017) U.S. Open 2017: how wide are these ridiculously wide fairways at Erin Hills? https://www.golfdigest.com/story/just-how-wide-are-these-ridiculously-wide-fairways-at-erin-hills-lets-put-that-in-perspective. Accessed June 2019

  37. Jones KM, Betzler NF, Wallace ES, Otto SR (2019) Differences in shaft strain patterns during golf drives due to stiffness and swing effects. Sports Eng 22:14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0308-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. TrackMan (2018) Face to path. https://blog.trackmangolf.com/face-to-path/. Accessed June 2019

  39. Cochran A, Stobbs J (1968) The search for the perfect swing. J. B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dewhurst P (2015) The science of the perfect swing. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from Dr. McPhee’s Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Biomechatronic System Dynamics, and Ping Inc. for collecting the experimental data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William McNally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McNally, W., Henrikson, E. & McPhee, J. A continuous analytical shaft model for fast dynamic simulation of the golf swing. Sports Eng 22, 20 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0314-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0314-5

Keywords

Navigation