Skip to main content
Log in

An analysis of the putter face control mechanism in golf putting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The B-matrix method, which systematically analyses the dynamic response of non-symmetric rigid bodies, such as golf putters, is described. The three-dimensional translational and rotational accelerations of the putter face are represented by linear equations of input forces and moments represented in matrix form. The elements of the 6 × 6 B-matrix physically represent the acceleration intensity factors. This method is applied to the analysis of the putter face control mechanism. The input forces and moments are obtained by the inverse dynamics method, whilst special attention is paid to the putter face rotation, i.e. the angular acceleration around the axis of the shaft, \( \dot{w}_{ox} . \) The contribution of input forces and moments on \( \dot{w}_{ox} \) is discussed quantitatively. The results demonstrate that \( \dot{w}_{ox} \) is present even if the input force and moment are applied perpendicularly to the shaft. A cancelling mechanism to correct this motion is discussed based on the B-matrix method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The letter “B” was selected by the authors from the initial letter of “BEAUTY,” which is an acronym for “basic elements of acceleration and their usage technology.

Abbreviations

 :

Dashed vectors indicate fixed spatial coordinates and solid vectors indicate rigid body coordinates.

B :

B-matrix

E :

Unit matrix composed of three rows and three columns

F i :

External force vector acting on the input point i

F g :

Equivalent force vector of F i acting on the centre of gravity (COG) g

I g :

Inertia tensor of the rigid body in coordinates parallel to the rigid body coordinate system at the COG

I g :

Inertia tensor of the rigid body in coordinates parallel to the spatial coordinate system at the COG (\( \user2{I}_{g}^{\user2{'}} \user2{ = RI}_{g} \user2{R}^{\user2{t}} \))

M i :

External moment of the force vector acting on the input point i

M g :

Equivalent moment of the force vector of F i and M i acting on the COG g

m :

Mass of the rigid body

R :

Rotational matrix to convert from rigid body coordinates to the spatial coordinate system

r g :

Position vector at the COG with reference to the origin

r gi :

Position vector at the input point with reference to the COG

r go :

Position vector at the output point with reference to the COG

r i :

Position vector at the input point with reference to the origin

r o :

Position vector at the output point with reference to the origin

S gi :

Skew-symmetric matrix formed by the input point vector r gi

S go :

Skew-symmetric matrix formed by the output point vector r go

\( \dot{\varvec{v}}_{\varvec{o}} \) :

Translational acceleration vector at the output point o

w g :

Angular velocity vector at the COG g

\( \dot{\varvec{w}}_{\varvec{o}} \) :

Angular acceleration vector at the output point o

g :

COG of the overall rigid body

i :

Input point

o :

Output point

References

  1. Riccio LJ (1990) Statistical analysis of the average golfer. In: Cochran AJ (ed) Science and golf. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, E&FN Spone, London, pp 153–158

  2. Shimizu T, Tsuchida M, Satoh M, Takahashi K, Arakawa K (2008) B-matrix theory to analyze putting dynamics. In: Crews D, Lutz R (eds) Science and Golf V. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, ironwood lithographers, USA, pp 369–375

  3. Brouillette M, Valade G (2008) The effect of putter face grooves on the incipient rolling motion of a golf ball. In: Crews D, Lutz R (eds) Science and golf V. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf. Ironwood Lithographers, USA, pp 363–368

  4. Thomas PR, Neumann DL, Hooper SL (2008) Attentional focus and putting performance at different levels of skill development. In: Crews D, Lutz R (eds) Science and golf V. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Ironwood Lithographers, USA, pp 224–231

  5. Iwatsubo T, Kiriyama S, Moriyama K (2007) Dynamics of putter club and its application. In: Joint symposium 2006: proceedings of symposium on sports engineering, Tsukuba, pp 35–40

  6. Nozawa M, Arai T, Suda K (2006) Comparison between physical pendulum and human putting movement. In: Joint symposium 2006: proceedings of symposium on sports engineering, Ishikawa, pp 181–185

  7. Fitzpatrick K, Anderson R (2006) Validation of accelerometers and gyroscopes to provide real-time kinematic data for golf analysis. In: Moritz EF and Haake S (eds) The engineering of sports 6. Proceedings of the engineering of sport, vol 6. Springer, UK, pp 155–160

  8. Brooks RJ (2002) Is it a pendulum, Is it a plane? Mathematical models of putting. In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Routledge, London, pp 127–141

  9. Potts AD (2002) Putting alignment in golf: a laser-based evaluation. In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Routledge, London, pp 142–150

  10. Carnahan JV (2002) Experimental study of effects of distance, slope and break on putting performance for active golfers. In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Routledge, London, pp 113–125

  11. Pelz D (2000) Dave Pelz’s putting bible. Random House Publishers, USA

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hubbard M, Always L (1998) Mechanical interaction of the golf ball with putting greens. In: Farrally MR, Cochran AJ (eds) Science and golf III. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Human Kinetics, London, pp 429–439

  13. Tierney DE, Coop RH (1998) A bivariate probability model for putting proficiency. In: Farrally MR, Cochran AJ (eds) Science and golf III. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Human Kinetics, London, pp 385–394

  14. Delay D, Nougier V, Oriaguet JP, Coello Y (1997) Movement control in golf putting, Human Movement Science. doi:10.1016/s0167-9457(97)00008-0

  15. Pelz D (1995) Scientific putter selection. In: Cochran AJ (ed) Golf: the scientific way. Ian Hornblow, UK, pp 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoadley B (1994) How to lower your putting score without improving. In: Cochran AJ, Farrally R (eds) Science and golf II. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, E&FN Spone, London, pp 186–192

  17. Baumeister J, Reinecke K, Herbarth B, Herwegen H, Liesen H, Weiss M (2008) Brain activity in a golf putting task: the effect of skill level. In: Crews D, Lutz R (eds) Science and golf V. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Ironwood Lithographers, USA, pp 208–215

  18. Marquardt C, Fischer M (2008) Movement kinematics of the golfer’s “yips”. In: Crews D, Lutz R (eds) Science and golf V. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Ironwood Lithographers, USA, pp 216–223

  19. Douglas K, Fox KR (2002) Performance and practice of elite woman European tour golfers during a pressure and a non-pressure putting simulation. In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Routledge, London, pp 167–177

  20. Beauchamp PH (1998) Peak putting performance: psychological skills and strategies utilized by PGA tour golfers. In: Farrally MR, Cochran AJ (eds) Science and golf III. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Human Kinetics, London, pp 181–189

  21. Coffey B, Mathison T, Viker V, Reichow A, Hogan C, Pelz D (1990) Visual alignment considerations in golf putting. In: Cochran AJ (ed) Science and golf. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, E&FN Spone, London, pp 76–80

  22. Cochran AJ, Stobbs J (1968) The search for the perfect swing. Morrison & Gibb Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Daish CB (1972) The physics of ball games. The English Universities Press Ltd, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirose S (1987) Robot engineering. Shoukabou, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ikegami Y, Sakurai S, Yabe K (1991) DLT method. JPN J of Sports Science, Tokyo, pp 191–195

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones IR (2002), Is the impact of a golf ball Hertzian ? In: Thain E (ed) Science and golf IV. Proceedings of the world scientific congress of golf, Routledge, London, pp 501–514

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tetsuo Shimizu.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The time derivative of vector r o is v o , as shown in the left-hand diagram of Fig. 1, which leads to

$$ \varvec{v}^{'}_{\user2{o}} = \dot{\varvec{r}}^{'}_{\user2{o}} = \dot{\varvec{r}}^{'}_{\user2{g}} + \dot{\varvec{r}}^{'}_{{\user2{go}}} = \dot{\varvec{r}}^{'}_{\user2{g}} + \dot{\varvec{r}}_{{\user2{go}}}^{'*} + \user2{w}^{'}_{\user2{g}} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{{\user2{go}}} $$
(16)

where r go is the position vector from point g to point o and \( \dot{\varvec{r}}_{go}^{'*} \) in the right-hand formula is a differential relating only to the pure expansion or contraction of r go [24]. In case of rigid bodies, \( \dot{\varvec{r}}_{go}^{'*} \) is zero. Therefore, Eq. (16) becomes

$$ \user2{v}^{'}_{\user2{o}} = \user2{v}^{'}_{\user2{g}} + \user2{w}^{'}_{\user2{g}} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{{\user2{go}}} $$
(17)

and the time derivative of Eq. (17) yields the acceleration, i.e.

$$ \dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{o} = \dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{g} + \dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{g} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{go} + \user2{w}^{'}_{g} \times \dot{\varvec{r}}^{'}_{go} = \dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{g} + \dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{g} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{go} + \user2{w}^{'}_{g} \times \left( {\dot{\varvec{r}}_{go}^{'*} + \user2{w}^{'}_{g} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{go} } \right). $$
(18)

Consequently, the acceleration and angular acceleration \( (\dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{o} ,\dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{o} ) \) at point o can be expressed by \( (\dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{g} ,\dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{g} ) \) at point g,

$$ \dot{\varvec{v}}{}^{'}_{o} = \dot{\varvec{v}}^{'}_{g} + \dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{g} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{go} + \user2{w}^{'}_{g} \times (\user2{w}^{'}_{g} \times \user2{r}^{'}_{go} ), $$
(19)
$$ \dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{o} = \dot{\varvec{w}}^{'}_{g} . $$
(20)

Appendix 2

If the quadratic terms of w g in Eqs. (4) and (5) are much less than the other terms, they can be neglected. As vector and tensor are frame-invariant, all of Eqs. (1)–(6) are converted to the non-dashed ones in the rigid body coordinate system. After these processings, these six equations can be described by three equations in the linear matrix form using the E, S gi and S go matrices:

$$ \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\user2{F}_{g} } \\ {\user2{M}_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} \user2{E} & \user2{0} \\ { - \user2{S}_{gi} } & \user2{E} \\ \end{array} } \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\user2{F}_{i} } \\ {\user2{M}_{i} } \\ \end{array} } \right], $$
(21)
$$ \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\user2{F}_{g} } \\ {\user2{M}_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {m\user2{E}} & \user2{0} \\ \user2{0} & {\user2{I}_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\dot{\varvec{v}}_{g} } \\ {\dot{\varvec{w}}_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right] $$
(22)

and

$$ \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\dot{\varvec{v}}_{o} } \\ {\dot{\varvec{w}}_{o} } \\ \end{array} } \right] = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} \user2{E} & { + \user2{S}_{go} } \\ \user2{0} & \user2{E} \\ \end{array} } \right]\left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\dot{\varvec{v}}_{g} } \\ {\dot{\varvec{w}}_{g} } \\ \end{array} } \right], $$
(23)

where S gi and S go are skew-symmetric matrices defined using the position vectors r gi and r go,

$$ \user2{r}_{gi} = \left( {x_{gi} ,y_{gi} ,z_{gi} } \right)^{t} , $$
(24)
$$ \user2{S}_{gi} \equiv \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 0 & { + z_{gi} } & { - y_{gi} } \\ { - z_{gi} } & 0 & { + x_{gi} } \\ { + y_{gi} } & { - x_{gi} } & 0 \\ \end{array} } \right], $$
(25)
$$ \user2{r}_{go} = \left( {x_{go} ,y_{go} ,z_{go} } \right)^{t} , $$
(26)
$$ \user2{S}_{go} \equiv \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} 0 & { + z_{go} } & { - y_{go} } \\ { - z_{go} } & 0 & { + x_{go} } \\ { + y_{go} } & { - x_{go} } & 0 \\ \end{array} } \right]. $$
(27)

An arbitrary vector V and the inertia tensor I g in the rigid body coordinate system can be converted to these in the space coordinate system using the rotational matrix R.

$$ \user2{V}^{'} = \user2{RV,} $$
(28)
$$ \user2{I}_{g}^{'} = \user2{RI}_{g} \user2{R}^{t} . $$
(29)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shimizu, T., Tsuchida, M., Kawai, K. et al. An analysis of the putter face control mechanism in golf putting. Sports Eng 12, 21–30 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0025-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-009-0025-4

Keywords

Navigation