Skip to main content
Log in

Predictors of Successful Management of Renal Calculus Disease in Horseshoe Kidney

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Horseshoe kidney is a rare congenital anomaly resulting from the fusion of the lower pole leading to medial and caudal deviation of kidneys that pose challenges to successful stone clearance. We evaluated the various patient- and treatment-related factors that can impact successful stone clearance. A total of 34 patients with 36 renal moieties with urolithiasis in horseshoe kidneys from 2015 to 2021 were included with a median age of 38 years (11–56 years). The mean calculus size was 39.27 mm (21–70 mm). Twenty-two patients had left, 10 had right, and 2 had bilateral disease. Twelve patients (33%) had previous interventions done. As per Guy stone score (GSS), 14 patients had grade IV, 16 patients had grade III, and 4 patients had grade II disease. Of these patients, 22 underwent unilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), 2 underwent bilateral PCNL, 6 had pyelolithotomy, 2 had right nephrectomy, and 2 patients underwent shockwave lithotripsy (SWL). Six patients undergoing pyelolithotomy had complete clearance. In PCNL, infra-costal puncture was done uniformly. Complete clearance was seen in 12 out of 16 with superior calyceal access (75% stone-free rates, SFR), 2 out of 8 with middle calyceal puncture (25% SFR), and both the cases with inferior calyceal puncture (100% SFR). Factors affecting stone clearance are as follows: GSS, i.e., grade < IV vs ≥ IV (71.4 vs 50%, P = 0.42), STONE score < 12 vs ≥ 12 (83.3 vs 28.5%, P = 0.048), stone size < 40 vs ≥ 40 mm (50 vs 71.4%, P = 0.42). Our analysis showed that stone clearance was independent of mode of access, GSS, or stone size, although STONE score was a predictor of successful outcomes in PCNL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The corresponding author assures the reviewers/editor that all the data and relevant materials are available and same can be furnished if reviewers/editors feel it is necessary for publication.

References

  1. Raj GV, Auge BK, Weizer AZ, Denstedt JD, Watterson JD, Beiko DT, Assimos DG, Preminger GM (2003) Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 170(1):48–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000067620.60404.2d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yohannes P, Smith AD (2002) The endourological management of complications associated with horseshoe kidney. J Urol 168(1):5–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas K, Smith NC, Hegarty N, Glass JM (2011) The Guy’s stone score–grading the complexity of percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures. Urology 78(2):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schiappacasse G, Aguirre J, Soffia P, Silva CS, Zilleruelo N (2015) CT findings of the main pathological conditions associated with horseshoe kidneys. Br J Radiol 88(1045):20140456. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20140456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shokeir AA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM et al (2004) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treatment of large stones within horseshoe kidneys. Urology 64(3):426–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yoshino T, Wake K, Sugitani T et al (2017) Hinyokika Kiyo 63(4):157–161. https://doi.org/10.14989/ActaUrolJap_63_4_157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ölçücüoğlu E, Çamtosun A, Biçer S, Bayraktar AM (2014) Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in a horseshoe kidney. Turk J Urol 40(4):240–244. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2014.73604

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bai Y, Tang Y, Deng L et al (2017) Management of large renal stones: laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol. 17(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-017-0266-7 (Published 2017 Aug 31)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liatsikos EN, Kallidonis P, Stolzenburg JU et al (2010) Percutaneous management of staghorn calculi in horseshoe kidneys: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 24(4):531–536. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tepeler A, Sehgal PD, Akman T et al (2014) Factors affecting outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 84(6):1290–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.08.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. El Ghoneimy MN, Kodera AS, Emran AM, Orban TZ, Shaban AM, El Gammal MM (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidneys: is rigid nephroscopy sufficient tool for complete clearance? A case series study. BMC Urol. 9:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-9-17 (Published 2009 Nov 16)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Satav V, Sabale V, Pramanik P, Kanklia SP, Mhaske S (2018) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of horseshoe kidney: our institutional experience. Urol Ann 10(3):258–262. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_152_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Etemadian M, Maghsoudi R, Abdollahpour V, Amjadi M (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney: our 5-year experience. Urol J 10(2):856–860

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Al-Otaibi K, Hosking DH (1999) Percutaneous stone removal in horseshoe kidneys. J Urol 162(3 Pt 1):674–677. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199909010-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar U, Tomar V, Yadav SS et al (2018) STONE score versus Guy’s Stone Score - prospective comparative evaluation for success rate and complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol Ann 10(1):76–81. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_119_17

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ritesh Goel: involved in data collection, patient follow-up, analysis of the data and final write-up.

Siddharth Jain: involved in primary draft formulation and final write-up

Ankit Sachan: involved in laboratory work-up and final formulation of manuscript

Nitish Aggarwal: involved in data analysis and review of literature

Amlesh Seth: involved in data collection and formulation of paper and guidance for submission

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siddharth Jain.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study received ethics clearance from Institute Ethics committee vide number IEC/620/7/2022.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

It is a retrospective study and all patients admitting have given informed consent for inclusion in study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goel, R., Jain, S., Sachan, A. et al. Predictors of Successful Management of Renal Calculus Disease in Horseshoe Kidney. Indian J Surg 85, 788–792 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03572-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-022-03572-4

Keywords

Navigation