Skip to main content
Log in

Factors Associated with Inability to Perform Delayed Primary Fascial Closure of Open Abdomen in Trauma Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is advised that we should never hesitate in leaving the abdomen open when required. However, once the patient is stabilised, we should close it as soon as possible. But the factors which would hamper delayed primary fascial closure (DPFC) are not well studied. A retrospective 5-year analysis of patients with open abdomen (OA) after trauma laparotomy who survived was conducted. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those in which DPFC was possible and those in whom it was not. Out of the 58 patients that were recruited, DPFC could not be performed in 48 patients. Quantum of fluid resuscitation at 48 h was not associated with an inability to perform DPFC. Early definitive control of bleeding and damage control resuscitation are associated with the ability to perform DPFC in OA patients. Presence of blood stream infections (BSIs), ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), and intra-abdominal sepsis (IAS) precluded DPFC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AAST :

American Association for the Surgery of Trauma

BSI :

Blood stream infection

DCL :

Damage control laparotomy

DPFC :

Delayed primary fascial closure

EAF :

Entero-atmospheric fistula

HVI :

Hollow viscus injury

IAS :

Intra-abdominal sepsis

INR :

Indian national rupee

IQR :

Interquartile range

NPC :

Non-primary closure

NPWT :

Negative pressure wound therapy

OA :

Open abdomen

STSG :

Split thickness skin grafting

USD :

US dollar

VAP :

Ventilator-associated pneumonia

References

  1. Goussous N, Jenkins DH, Zielinski MD (2014) Primary fascial closure after damage control laparotomy: sepsis vs haemorrhage. Injury 45(1):151–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Stawicki SP, Brooks A, Bilski T, Scaff D, Gupta R, Schwab CW et al (2008) The concept of damage control: extending the paradigm to emergency general surgery. Injury 39(1):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Függer R, Schulz F, Rogy M, Herbst F, Mirza D, Fritsch A (1991) Open approach in pancreatic and infected pancreatic necrosis: laparostomies and preplanned revisions. World J Surg 15(4):516–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Demetriades D (2012) Total management of the open abdomen. Int Wound J 9:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Agarwal H, Gupta A, Choudhary N et al (2019) Evaluation of risk factors for enteric fistula and intra-abdominal sepsis in patients with open abdomen in trauma—a level 1 trauma centre study. Indian J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-019-01934-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coccolini F, Biffl W, Catena F, Ceresoli M, Chiara O, Cimbanassi S et al (2015) The open abdomen, indications, management and definitive closure. World J Emerg Surg 10(1):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ivatury RR (2009) Update on open abdomen management: achievements and challenges. World J Surg 33(6):1150–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheatham ML, Safcsak K, Brzezinski SJ, Lube MW (2007) Nitrogen balance, protein loss, and the open abdomen. Crit Care Med 35(1):127–131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Codner PA, Brasel KJ, deRoon-Cassini TA (2012) Staged abdominal repairs reduce long-term quality of life. Injury 43(9):1513–1516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Makkar N, Gupta A, Modi S, Bagaria D, Kumar S, Chumber S (2019) An analysis of the economic burden of the trauma services at a level 1 public sector trauma center in South Asia. J Emerg Trauma Shock 12(1):23

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Reserve Bank of India. Handbook of statistics on the Indian economy [Internet]. Available from:http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/Publications/PDFs/FHB100909_Full.pdf (Accessed on 28 April 2020)

  12. Coccolini F, Ceresoli M, Kluger Y, Kirkpatrick A, Montori G, Salvetti F et al (2019) Open abdomen and entero-atmospheric fistulae: an interim analysis from the International Register of Open Abdomen (IROA). Injury 50(1):160–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott BG, Feanny MA, Hirshberg A (2005) Early definitive closure of the open abdomen: a quiet revolution. Scand J Surg 94(1):9–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Burlew CC, Moore EE, Cuschieri J, Jurkovich GJ, Codner P, Crowell K et al (2011) Sew it up! A Western Trauma Association multi-institutional study of enteric injury management in the postinjury open abdomen. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 70(2):273–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley MJ, DuBose JJ, Scalea TM, Holcomb JB, Shrestha B, Okoye O et al (2013) Independent predictors of enteric fistula and abdominal sepsis after damage control laparotomy: results from the prospective AAST Open Abdomen registry. JAMA Surg 148(10):947–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Miller PR, Thompson JT, Faler BJ, Meredith JW, Chang MC (2002) Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 53(5):843–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cirocchi R, Birindelli A, Biffl WL, Mutafchiyski V, Popivanov G, Chiara O et al (2016) What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 81(3):575–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sharrock AE, Barker T, Yuen HM, Rickard R, Tai N (2016) Management and closure of the open abdomen after damage control laparotomy for trauma. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Injury 47(2):296–306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Regner JL, Kobayashi L, Coimbra R (2012) Surgical strategies for management of the open abdomen. World J Surg 36(3):497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Atema JJ, Gans SL, Boermeester MA (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World J Surg 39(4):912–925

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. van Hensbroek PB, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MGW, Busch ORC, Goslings JC (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33(2):199–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dubose JJ, Scalea TM, Holcomb JB, Shrestha B, Okoye O, Inaba K et al (2013) Open abdominal management after damage-control laparotomy for trauma: a prospective observational American Association for the Surgery of Trauma multicenter study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 74(1):113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beale EW, Janis JE, Minei JP, Elliott AC, Phelan HA (2013) Predictors of failed primary abdominal closure in the trauma patient with an open abdomen. South Med J 106(5):327–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang Q, Zhao R, Yue C, Wang W, Zhao Y, Ren J et al (2014) Fluid volume overload negatively influences delayed primary facial closure in open abdomen management. J Surg Res 187(1):122–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, H., Bagaria, D., Sagar, S. et al. Factors Associated with Inability to Perform Delayed Primary Fascial Closure of Open Abdomen in Trauma Patients: a Retrospective Observational Study. Indian J Surg 84, 983–989 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03184-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03184-4

Keywords

Navigation