Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Metallo Beta Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and its Association with Diabetic Foot

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains that produce metallo beta lactamases (MBLs) are becoming increasingly prevalent in wound infections. The aim of the present study is to determine the clinical features, incidence, and to find out the antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in diabetic foot infections. Pus samples for bacterial culture were collected from 310 patients admitted with diabetic foot infections. Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method. Carbapenem resistance screening and confirmation of MBL was done by the modified imipenem-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) double disc synergy test. A total of 54 Pseudomonas aeruginosa was isolated from 310 diabetic foot cases. Males were affected more than females with an M:F ratio of 1.6:1. Most patients belonged to the fifth decade of life with a mean age of 49 ± 16.8 years. All the patients were previously diagnosed with diabetes mellitus with duration of the disease at 16 ± 10.2 years and 63% were prescribed oral hypoglycaemic agents. Wound characteristics were classified according to Wagner’s classification majority of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were isolated from Wagner’s II and III grade wound. A number of 26 (89.7%) patients underwent debridement, while 9 (31%) patients underwent toe disarticulation, and 7 (24.1%) patients underwent below-the-knee (BKA) amputation. Antibiotic sensitivity testing revealed 20.3% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa were resistance to carbapenem and 81.8% of these were MBL mediated resistance. Infection with multi drug resistance organisms (MDROs) is common in diabetic foot ulcers and is associated with inadequate glycemic control and increased requirement for surgical treatment. There is a need for continuous surveillance of resistant bacteria to provide the basis for empirical therapy and reduce the risk of complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blazer K, Heidrich M (1999) Diabetic gangrene of the foot. Chirurg 70:831–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Logerfo FW, Coffman JD (1984) Current concepts. Vascular and microvascular diseases of the foot in diabetes. N Engl J Med 311:1615–1619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Tahawy AT (2000) Bacteriology of diabetic foot. Saudi Med J 21:344–347

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Nesbit CA (1996) Diabetic foot infections. Bacteriology and activity of 10 oral antimicrobial agents against bacteria isolated from consecutive cases. Diabetes Care 19:638–641

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shea KW (1999) Antimicrobial therapy for diabetic foot infections. A practical approach. Postgrad Med 106(85–86):89–94

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cunha BA (2000) Antibiotic selection for diabetic foot infections: a review. J Foot Ankle Surg 39:253–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clinical laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing. 16th informational supplement. CLSI document M2-A9. Wayne (PA) 2006.

  8. Leek LYS, Yong D, Yum JH, Chong Y (2003) Evaluation of the Hodge test and the imipenem-EDTA double disk synergy test for differentiation of metallo beta lactamases producing clinical isolates of Pseudomonas spp and Acinetobacter spp. J Clin Microbiol 41:4623–4629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Benedicto J, Juarez R, Lim S (1996) A descriptive study on the clinical characteristics, management and the outcome of diabetic patients with foot lesions admitted at the Philippine General Hospital. Phil J Intern Med 34:185–192

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bridges RM Jr, Deitch EA (1994) Diabetic foot infection: Pathophysiology and treatment. Surg Clin N Am 74(3):537–555

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gladstone P, Rajendran P, Brahmadathan KN (2005) Incidence of carbapenem resistant nonfermenting gram negative bacilli from patients with respiratory infections in the intensive care unit. Indian J Med Microbiol 23:189–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taneja N, Aharwal SM, Sharma M (2003) Imipenem resistance in nonfermenters causing nosocomial urinary tract infection. Indian J Med Sci 57:249–259

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bonfiglio G, Laksai GY, Amicosante L, Nicoletti G (1998) Mechanisms of B-lactam resistance amongst Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in an Italian survey. J Antimicrob Chemother 42:697–702

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Navaneeth BV, Sridaran D, Sahav D, Belwadi MRS (2002) A preliminary study on metallo b-lactamase producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa hospitalized patients. Indian J Med Res 116:264–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chickmagalure Shivaswamy VinodKumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VinodKumar, C.S., Hiresave, S., Kandagal Giriyapal, B. et al. Metallo Beta Lactamase Producing Pseudomonas Aeruginosa and its Association with Diabetic Foot. Indian J Surg 73, 291–294 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0287-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-011-0287-5

Keywords

Navigation