Skip to main content
Log in

CECOG experts’ recommendations on the use of denosumab in the prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastases of lung cancer

  • original report
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Skeletal-related events represent a substantial burden for patients with advanced cancer. Randomized, controlled studies suggested superiority of denosumab over zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal-related events in metastatic cancer patients, with a favorable safety profile. Experts gathered at the 2012 Skeletal Care Academy in Istanbul to bring forward practical recommendations, based on current evidence, for the use of denosumab in patients with bone metastases of lung cancer.

Recommendations

Based on current evidence, use of denosumab in lung cancer patients with confirmed bone metastases is recommended. It is important to note that clinical judgment should take into consideration the patient’s general performance status, overall prognosis, and live expectancy. Currently, the adverse event profile reported for denosumab includes hypocalcemia and infrequent occurrence of osteonecrosis of the jaw. Therefore, routine calcium and vitamin D supplementation, along with dental examination prior to denosumab initiation are recommended. There is no evidence for renal function impairment due to denosumab administration. At present, there is no rationale to discourage concomitant use of denosumab and surgery or radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BMA:

Bone modifying agent

CI:

Confidence interval

CRBD:

Cancer-related bone disease

CT:

Computed tomography

EBRT:

External beam radiation therapy

EGFR m+:

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation positive

EML4 ALK:

Characteristic abnormal configuration of DNA, where the echinoderm microtubuleassociated protein-like 4 (EML4) gene is fused to the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene

EMA:

European Medicines Agency

ESMO:

European Society for Medical Oncology

EU:

European Union

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

HCM:

Hypercalcemia of malignancy

HR:

Hazard ratio

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NSCLC:

Non-small cell lung cancer

ONJ:

Osteonecrosis of the jaw

Q4W:

Once every 4 weeks

RANKL:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand

SBRT:

Stereotactic body radiotherapy

SCA:

Skeletal Care Academy

SCLC:

Small cell lung cancer

SRE:

Skeletal-related event

US:

United States of America

References

  1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):220–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Waldron W, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2008, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2008/, based on November 2010 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site. 2011. Accessed 2 Jan 2013.

  4. Coleman RE. Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 2):6243s–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sugiura H, Yamada K, Sugiura T, Hida T, Mitsudomi T. Predictors of survival in patients with bone metastasis of lung cancer. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(3):729–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsuya A, Kurata T, Tamura K, Fukuoka M. Skeletal metastases in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study. Lung Cancer. 2007;57(2):229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS, Yanagihara R, Hirsh V, Krzakowski M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer. 2004;100(12):2613–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sekine I, Nokihara H, Yamamoto N, Kunitoh H, Ohe Y, Tamura T. Risk factors for skeletal-related events in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by chemotherapy. Lung Cancer. 2009;65(2):219–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Oefelein MG, Ricchiuti V, Conrad W, Resnick MI. Skeletal fractures negatively correlate with overall survival in men with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2002;168(3):1005–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian S, Yanagihara R, Hirsh V, Krzakowski M, et al. Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial–the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(16):3150–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. EMA. 2011 [January 2]; Available from: http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/002173/WC500110381.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2013.

  12. FDA. 2010 [January 2]; Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/125320s007lbl.pdf. Accessed 2 Jan 2013.

  13. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, Hirsh V, Hungria V, Prausova J, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(9):1125–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scagliotti GV, Hirsh V, Siena S, Henry DH, Woll PJ, Manegold C, et al. Overall survival improvement in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases treated with denosumab versus zoledronic acid: subgroup analysis from a randomized phase 3 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(12):1823–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Peters S, Adjei AA, Gridelli C, Reck M, Kerr K, Felip E, et al. Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(Suppl 7):vii56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, et al. Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(35):5132–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. Lancet. 2011;377(9768):813–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, Henry DH, Brown JE, Yardley DA, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomized, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(16):3082–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roodman GD. Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(16):1655–64.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kitazawa S, Kitazawa R. RANK ligand is a prerequisite for cancer-associated osteolytic lesions. J Pathol. 2002;198(2):228–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(8):584–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Feeley BT, Liu NQ, Conduah AH, Krenek L, Roth K, Dougall WC, et al. Mixed metastatic lung cancer lesions in bone are inhibited by noggin overexpression and Rank:Fc administration. J Bone Miner Res. 2006;21(10):1571–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jones DH, Nakashima T, Sanchez OH, Kozieradzki I, Komarova SV, Sarosi I, et al. Regulation of cancer cell migration and bone metastasis by RANKL. Nature. 2006; 440(7084):692–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller RE, Roudier M, Jones J, Armstrong A, Canon J, Dougall WC. RANK ligand inhibition plus docetaxel improves survival and reduces tumor burden in a murine model of prostate cancer bone metastasis. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(7):2160–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller R, Jones J, Roudier M, Dougall WC. The RANKL inhibitor OPG-Fc, either alone or in combination with docetaxel, blocks lung cancer-induced osteolytic lesions and reduces skeletal tumor burden in a murine model of non-small cell lung cancer in bone. 9th International Conference on Cancer-Induced Bone Disease;2009; Arlington, VA.

  26. Stahel RA, Peters S. ETOP Newsletter October 2012. 2012 [January 17]; Available from: http://www.etop-eu.org.

  27. Saad F, Brown JE, Van Poznak C, Ibrahim T, Stemmer SM, Stopeck AT, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of osteonecrosis of the jaw: integrated analysis from three blinded active-controlled phase III trials in cancer patients with bone metastases. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23(5):1341–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. AAOMS. Position Paper on Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—2009 Update. 2009 [January 2]; Available from: http://www.aaoms.org/docs/position_papers/bronj_update.pdf.

  29. Lutz S, Berk L, Chang E, Chow E, Hahn C, Hoskin P, et al. Palliative radiotherapy for bone metastases: an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79(4):965–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze WM. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(11):1423–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Agarawal JP, Swangsilpa T, van der Linden Y, Rades D, Jeremic B, Hoskin PJ. The role of external beam radiotherapy in the management of bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;18(10):747–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Hall WA, Stapleford LJ, Hadjipanayis CG, Curran WJ, Crocker I, Shu HK. Stereotactic body radiosurgery for spinal metastatic disease: an evidence-based review. Int J of Surg Oncol. 2011; 2011:979214.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, et al. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(8):756–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Fizazi K, Brown JE, Carducci M, Shore ND, Sieber P, Kueppers F, et al. editors. Denosumab in patients with metastatic prostate cancer previously treated with denosumab or zoledronic acid: 2-year open-label extension phase results from the pivotal phase 3 study. European Society of Medical Oncology;2012.

  35. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Martàn M, Body J-J, Paterson A, Steger GG, et al. editors. Denosumab in Patients with Breast Cancer and Bone Metastases Previously Treated with Zoledronic Acid or Denosumab: Results from the 2-Year Open-Label Extension Treatment Phase of a Pivotal Phase 3 Study. San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium;2011.

Download references

Conflict of interest

LT has received an honorarium from Central European Cooperative Oncology Group for the attendance of an advisory board.

WH had received an honorarium from Amgen for the attendance of an advisory board.

EKW received an honorarium from Central European Cooperative Oncology Group (CECOG) for the attendance of an advisory board and honoraria from Amgen.

All others declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lilla Tamasi MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hilbe, W., Abacioglu, U., Aebersold, D. et al. CECOG experts’ recommendations on the use of denosumab in the prevention of skeletal-related events in bone metastases of lung cancer. memo 6, 75–82 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-013-0088-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-013-0088-6

Keywords

Navigation