Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

In vivo inhibition of NAS preparation on H9N2 subtype AIV

  • Published:
Virologica Sinica

Abstract

NAS preparation, a kind of Chinese herbal medicine found by the Yunnan Eco-agricultural Research Institute, has potential antiviral activity. In this paper, the inhibiting effect of NAS preparation on H9N2 subtype Avian influenza virus (AIV) was investigated in vivo. Chickens infected with H9N2 virus were treated with NAS preparation for 4 days. The virus was then detected by hemoagglutination (HA) test and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The results showed that no H9N2 virus could be detected at the 7th day when the chickens were treated with 0.2g/kg/d or 0.1g/kg/d of NAS preparation. However the virus could be detected in other chickens without NAS preparation treatment. This result suggested that NAS preparation may be a potential drug candidate to control infection of H9N2 subtype AIV in chickens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Butt K M, Smith G J D, Chen H, et al. 2005. Human infection with an avian H9N2 influenza A virus in Hong Kong in 2003. J Clin Microbiol, 43 (11): 5760–5767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gai J Y. 2003. Test of statistical hypothesis. In: Methods of Experimental Statistics. The first edition. Beijing: The Publishing Company of China Agriculture, p92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gan M H. 2002. In: Avian Influenza. The second edition. BeiJing: The Publishing Company of China Agriculture, p 181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guo Y, Wang J. 2006. The new progress of study on arteannuin drugs. Chin J Clin Pharmacol Therap, 11(6): 615–618.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang J R, Liu Y M. 2005. The progress of study on chemical composition and pharmaco-activity of Hedyotic diffusa. Chin Formul Prod, (27): 1329–1332.(in Chinese)

  6. Jiang P, Huang L C. 1995. The studies on cumulative and general toxicity of common stonecrop herb. Liaoning J Trad Chin Med, 22(10): 475–479.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson C D, Kudsk K A, Fukatsu K, et al. 2003. Route of nutrition influences generation of antibody-forming cells and initial defense to an active viral infection in the upper respiratory tract. Ann Surg, 237(4): 565–573.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadir T, Kyosuke N, Avin K, et al. 1996. Antiviral effect of Sanicula europaea L. leaves extract on influenza virus-infected cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 225:22–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Katz J M, Lu X H, Tumpey T M, et al. 2000. Molecular correlates of influenza A H5N1 virus pathogenesis in mice. J Virol, 74(22): 10807–10810.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kyoko S, Stefan H, Masato H, et al. 2004. PB2 amino acid at position 627 affects replicative efficiency, but not cell tropism,of HongKong H5N1 influenza A viruses in mice. Virology, 320: 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li C J, Yu K Z, Tian G B, et al. 2005. Evolution of H9N2 influenza viuses from domestic poultry in Mainland China. Virology, 340(1): 70–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Long J X, Wang Q Z. 2005. The sequence analysis and all gene cloning of H5N1 subtype Avian Influenza virus(A/duck/Shandong/093/2004). Acta Microbiol Sin, 45(9): 1840–1842.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Matrosovich M N, Krauss S, Webster R G. 2001. H9N2 influenza A viruses from poultry in Asia have human viruslike receptor specificity. Virology, 281 (2): 156–162.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peiris M, Yuen K Y, Leung C W, et al. 1999. Human infection with influenza H9N2. Lancet, 354 (9182): 916–917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Qing F H. 1990. The enhancement properties of Hedyotic diffusa on mice immune functions. Shanghai J Immunol, (16): 32–34. (in Chinese)

  16. Schmidtke M, Schnittler U, Jahn B, et al. 2001. A rapid assay for evaluation of antiviral activity against coxsackie virus B3,influenza virus A,and herpessimples virus type 1. J Virological Methods, 95: 133–143.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shang R F, Na Z Y, Yang H J, et al. 2008. The Effect of NAS preparation on Killing H5N1 and H9N2 subtype AIV in vitro. J Trad Chin Veter Med, 6:5–7.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang J M, Yan J P. 2003. The progress of study on pharmacologic action of common stonecrop herb. Acta Chin Med Pharmacol, 31(4): 57–59.(in Chinese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X h, Cui Y, Liang J P, et al. 2005. The general and chronic toxicity test of NAS preparation. J Trad Chin Veter Med, 4:24–25.(in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yin Z, Liu J H. 1997. The laboratory diagnostic techniques of viral diseases. In: Animal Virology, Beijing: Science Press, 291-294.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng H Z. 1997. In: The modern study and application of traditional Chinese medicine. Beijing: Academe publishing company, p221–225.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu X L, Wei X B. 2006. The progress of study on anti-virus Chinese herbal medicine. Chin J Trad Veter Sci, (1): 33–38.(in Chinese)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-ping Liang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Key Technologies Research and Development Program (2004BA519A26)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shang, Rf., Liang, Jp., Na, Zy. et al. In vivo inhibition of NAS preparation on H9N2 subtype AIV. Virol. Sin. 25, 145–150 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-010-3082-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-010-3082-8

Key words

Navigation