Skip to main content
Log in

An Application of the MARCOS Method Within the Framework of Sustainability to Determine the Optimum Recycled Fibre-Containing Fabric

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to determine the best fabric structure containing recycled fibre for a daily use summer t-shirt considering the physical and comfort properties through a multi-criteria decision making methodology. Herein, 12 cotton fabric and 12 polyester fabric structures contained different blend ratios of virgin fibre, recycled fibre and elastane were generated. Alternatives were tested according to the 10 criteria assessed by 20 experts and were ranked Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (MARCOS) method. The air permeability and mass per unit area were weighted as the two most important criteria. Supportively, 80/20% BCI Co/ r-Co blended fabric (A11) among cotton alternatives, 100% r-PET blended fabric (A21) among polyester alternatives were ranked as the best fabric alternatives providing desired test results. Furthermore, it was determined that composition ratios of the fabric had no direct effect on ranking. This study proved that MARCOS method is a convenient and useful tool under the conditions of finite alternatives and conflicting criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. https://www.overshootday.org Accessed Date: 24 July 2022

  2. A. Sestino, C. Amatulli, M.D. Angelis, Consumers’ attitudes toward sustainable luxury products: the role of perceived uniqueness and conspicuous consumption orientation (In Handloom Sustainability and Culture, Springer, Singapore, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.E. DeVoy, E. Congiusta, D.J. Lundberg, S. Findeisen, S. Bhattacharya, Waste Manage. 136, 303 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. A.K. Chapagain, A.Y. Hoekstra, H.H. Savenije, R. Gautam, Ecol Eco. 60, 186 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. R.B. Chavan, J Textile Sci Eng S. 2, 2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.P. Juanga-Labayen, I.V. Labayen, Q. Yuan, Textiles 2, 174 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Celep, G.D. Tetik, F. Yilmaz, IntechOpen 1, 554 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.M. Hawley, Textile recycling: A systems perspective. In Recycling in textiles (Woodhead Publishing Limited, UK, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. Kessler, S.A. Matlin, K. Kuemmerer, Current Opin Green Sustain Chem 32, 21 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Parliament Briefing, 2022, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/729405/EPRS_BRI(2022)729405_EN.pdf Accessed Date: 24 July 2022.

  11. S. Johnson, D. Echeverria, R. Venditti, H. Jameel, Y. Yao, AATCC J. Res. 7, 19 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. X. Chen, H.A. Memon, Y. Wang, I. Marriam, M. Tebyetekerwa, Mater Circular Eco 3, 1 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  13. G. Sandin, G.M. Peters, J. Cleaner Product. 184, 353 (2018)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Liu, S. Liu, T. Liu, T. Liu, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Carbohyd. Polym. 206, 141 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. M.T. Halimi, M.B. Hassen, B. Azzouz, F. Sakli, J. the Text. Inst. 98, 437 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Hasani, S.A. Tabatabaei, Fibres & Text East Euro 19, 21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. Wanassi, B. Azzouz, M.B. Hassen, Ind. Crops Prod. 87, 27 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ö.K. Necef, N. Seventekin, M. Pamuk, Teks. ve Konf. 23, 286 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. B. Ütebay, P. Çelik, A. Çay, J. Cleaner Product. 222, 29 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. F.A. Esteve-Turrillas, M. de La Guardia, Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 116, 107 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Ichim, C. Sava, Buletinul Agir 3, 65 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. Yasin, N. Behary, M. Curti, G. Rovero, Fibers 4, 16 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. Telli, N. Özdil, J. Engin, Fibers and Fab. 10, 47 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.U. Khan, T. Hassan, M. Wasim, M.Q. Khan, A. Salam, S.Z.U. Hassan, A.M.R. Abbasi, T. Mustafa, Polym. Bull. 1, 3345 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  25. E. Sarıoğlu, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. and Tech. 31, 439 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. L. Shen, E. Worrell, M.K. Patel, Conserv. Recycl. 55, 34 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. A. Telli, O. Babaarslan, Teks. ve Konf. 27, 224 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. T. Vadicherla, D. Saravanan, Fibres Text Eastern Euro 25, 48 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Memon, H.S. Ayele, H.M. Yesuf, L. Sun, Sustainability 14, 9453 (2022)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. A. K. Dash, R. Nayak, Management of protective clothing waste. In "Waste Management in the Fashion and Textile Industries”, R. Nayak, A. Patnaik (Eds.) Woodhead Publishing, 233–251 (2021)

  31. R.A. Sanches, R. Rocha, A.Y.S. Duarte, “Proposal for producing new fabric through the use of fabric scraps discarded by ibitinga clothing manufacturers: A Brazilian example of circular economy”, In meeting of research in music, arts and design (Springer, Cham, 2023)

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Vadicherla, D. Saravanan, Indian J. Fibre and Text. Res. 42, 318 (2017)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. V.K. Dhanapal, R. Dhanakodi, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 4, 76 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  34. G. Celep, G. Doğan, M.E. Yüksekkaya, M. Tercan, Düzce Uni. J. Sci. & Tech. 4, 104 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  35. A.D. Gun, G. Alan, A.S. Macit, The. J. Text. Inst. 107, 1112 (2016)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Z. Stevic, N. Brkovic, Logistics 4, 1 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Deveci, E. Özcan, R. John, Appl. Soft Comput. 109, 107532 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Mitra, 2022 Res. Tekst. ve Konf. (ahead-of-print).

  39. S. Vesković, Ž Stević, Z. Nunić, Appl Intel 1, 223 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. Hasheminasab, S. Hashemkhani Zolfani, E. Kazimieras Zavadskas M. Kharrazi, M. Skare, Eco Res-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 35, 564 (2022)

  41. F. Ecer, D. Pamucar, Appl. Soft Comput. 104, 107199 (2021)

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Stanković, Ž Stević, D.K. Das, M. Sbotić, D. Pamučar, Mathematics 8, 457 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  43. S. Chakraborty, R. Chattopadhyay, S. Chakraborty, Dec Mak Applicat Manag Eng 3, 49 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ž Stević, S. Miškić, D. Vojinović, E. Huskanović, M. Stanković, D. Pamučar, Axioms 11, 140 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  45. B. Varghese, P. Karande, Materials Today Proce 52, 1397 (2022)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. J. Mitrović Simić, Ž. Stević, and E. K. Zavadskas, Symmetry 12, 2006 (2020)

  47. M. Bakır, Ş Akan, E. Özdemir, Facta Universitatis. Series. Mech. Eng. 19, 423 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Kovač, S. Tadić, M. Krstić, Complexity 1, 887 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  49. A. H. Makhdum, H. N. Khan, and S. Ahmad, 2011 Reducing cotton footprints through implementation of better management practices in cotton production; a step towards Better Cotton Initiative, In Proceedings of the Fifth Meeting of the Asian Cotton Research and Development Network, Lahore, Pakistan

  50. P. Shah, A. Bansal, R.K. Singh, Life cycle assessment of organic, BCI and conventional cotton: a comparative study of cotton cultivation practices in India (In Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies, Springer, Cham, 2018)

    Google Scholar 

  51. F. Zulfiqar, A. Datta, G.B. Thapa, J. Cleaner Product. 166, 1372 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ž Stević, D. Pamučar, A. Puška, P. Chatterjee, Comp. Indust. Engineering 140, 106231 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  53. G. Albini, V. Brunella, B. Placenza, B. Martorana, V.G. Lambertini, J. Indust. Text. 48, 992 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. A. Bivainyte, D. Mikucioniene, Fibres Textiles Eastern Euro 19, 69 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  55. R. Ciukas, J. Abramaviciute, Fibres Text Eastern Euro 18, 84 (2010)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. M. Isler, D. Tama Birkocak, M.J. Abreu, The influence of starch desizing on thermal properties of traditional fabrics in Anatolia (In Handloom Sustainability and Culture, Springer, Singapore, 2021)

    Google Scholar 

  57. M. Kilic, H. K. Kaynak, G. B. Kilic, M. Demir, E. Tiryaki, Effect of recycled cotton usage on properties of OE-rotor yarns and knitted fabrics, In AUTEX World Textile Conference, (2016)

  58. Ö.K. Necef, D. Birkocak, A. Kılıç, S. Boz, M.J. Abreu, Z. Öndoğan, Autex Res. J (2022). https://doi.org/10.2478/aut-2022-0020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. S.B. Stankovic, D. Popovic, G.B. Poparic, Polym. Testing 27, 41 (2008)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. S. Mezarcıöz, S. Mezarcıöz, R. Oğulata, Textile and Apparel 24, 202 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  61. M.B. Uzumcu, B. Sari, N. Oglakcioglu, H. Kadoğlu, Fibers and Polymers 20, 2342 (2019)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. N. Özdil, S. Boz, Z.B. Ünal, G.S. Mengüç, Industria Textila 65, 287 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  63. W.E. Morton, J.W. Hearle, Physical properties of textile fibres” (Elsevie, USA, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eda Acar.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Birkocak, D.T., Acar, E., Bakadur, A.Ç. et al. An Application of the MARCOS Method Within the Framework of Sustainability to Determine the Optimum Recycled Fibre-Containing Fabric. Fibers Polym 24, 2595–2608 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00197-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-023-00197-6

Keywords

Navigation