Abstract
In apparel manufacturing, more than 50 % cost is consumed by the textile fabric. Therefore companies have significant apprehensions in the fabric utilization. It can result in more efficient and cost-effective in fabric utilization if they are related to different body shapes. The purpose of this study is to classify female body shapes and evaluate fabric utilization efficiency for each category of the body shape. To this end, three dimensional (3D) body scans are collected from 124 young female subjects. For the body shape analysis, 3D body scans are processed by using Moore neighbor algorithm and region prop function to perceive the outermost shell. Moreover, both front and side view of the scans is processed for data reduction using Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and clustering using K-Means ++. It has been observed through our analysis of a dataset that female bodies can be categorized into four body shapes, that is, oval shape, circle shape, triangle shape, and rectangle shape. It has also been observed that all four body shape categories exhibit dissimilar anthropometric size measures. The result implies that these body shapes have devoured different fabric utilization for the garments (fitted trouser and fitted shirt). It has been noted that in fitted trouser and fitted shirt the most effective is the rectangle shape (cluster 4) and the least is the circle shape (cluster 2) in the fabric consumption. Similarly, the fitted trousers utilize less fabric while the fitted shirts consume more fabric in all body shapes. These findings provide a better reference of fabric utilization and cost-effectiveness to the apparel manufacturers while producing garments for different categories of the body shape.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. E. Glock and G. I. Kunz, “Apparel Manufacturing: Sewn Product Analysis”, 4th ed., pp.173–183, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2005.
W. K. Wong and S. Y. S. Leung, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114, 376 (2008).
D. M. Rose and D. R. Shier, Comput. Oper. Res., 34, 3209 (2007).
Z. Li and V. Milenkovic, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 84, 539 (1995).
T. Naveed, A. Hussain, and Y. Zhong, Text. Res. J., 88, 1571 (2017).
E. Ko and S. Kim, Fiber. Polym., 14, 860 (2013).
E. K. Burke, R. S. R. Hellier, G. Kendall, and G. Whitwell, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 179, 27 (2007).
D. A. Agbo and V. Igoli, IJSRISE, 1, 29 (2015).
D. A. Agbo, Nigeria Journal of Education, Health and Technology Research, 4, 1 (2013).
V. Chattaraman, K. P. Simmons, and P. V. Ulrich, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 31, 291 (2013).
C. H. Hsu, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 4185 (2009).
B. Allen, B. Curless, and Z. Popovic, 03 ACM SIGGRAPH, 22, 587 (2003).
K. Okabe, N. Yamana, and K. Yamamoto, Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-uses, 36, 42 (1995).
R. Otieno, G. Pisut, and L. Jo Connell, J. Fashion Marketing and Management, 11, 366 (2007).
L. H. Bai and W. B. Zhang, J. Text. Res., China Text. Eng. Soc., 27, 113 (2006).
D. B. Nascimento, J. Neiva de Figueiredo, S. F. Mayerle, P. R. Nascimento, and R. M. Casali, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 128, 379 (2010).
Y. L. Choi and Y. J. Nam, Hum. Factor Ergon. Man., 20, 378 (2010).
X. Jing, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 27, 358 (2015).
A. Petrova and S. P. Ashdown, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 26, 227 (2008).
G. Mori and J. Malik, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 28, 1052 (2006).
J. Nantel, J. Interact. Mark., 18, 73 (2004).
K. P. Simmons, Ph. D. Dissertation, NCSU, North Carolina, 2003.
K. Simmons, C. Istook, and P. Devarajan, J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag., 4, 1 (2004).
K. Simmons and C. L. Istook, J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag., 4, 16 (2004).
V. Arzu and B. Ender, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 23, 46 (2011).
A. Knox, L. J. Connell, P. Ulrich, and G. Hutton, “Research Report for External Body”, NTU, Nottingham, 2015.
J. Yim Lee, C. L. Istook, Y. Ja Nam, and S. M. Park, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 19, 374 (2007).
W. Lee and H. Imaoka, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 22, 297 (2010).
N. Kim, H. K. Song, S. Kim, and W. Do, Fiber. Polym., 19, 1781 (2018).
S. Goel and R. Tashakkori, Collaborative Mathematics and Statistics Research, 109, 161 (2015).
L. Yin, L. Xia, and C. Xu, J. Text. Res., China Text. Eng. Soc., 35, 113 (2014).
M. J. Chung, H. F. Lin, and M. J. J. Wang, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 37, 707 (2007).
F. Xia, H. Xie, D. Li, G. Wu, and Y. Zhong, Journal of Textile Research, China Textile Engineering Society, 38, 86 (2017).
Y. A. Nada and H. Meshref, Int. J. Comput., 105, 15 (2014).
ASTM D5586/D5586M-10, Standard Tables of Body Measurements for Women Aged 55 and Older (All Figure Types), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.
P. Komarkova and V. Glombikova, Tekst Konfeksiyon, 23, 409 (2013).
M. H. Sohn and E. Bye, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 33, 64 (2015).
Hutton, C. William, Malko, A. John, Fajman, and A. william, Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 74, 73 (2003).
I. Riter, “The Science of Personal Dress Complete Study: Body Shapes”, 2nd ed., pp.151–157, Pleasanton, California, USA, 2015.
Y. Zhong, China Patent, ZL 200910194538.X (2009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Naveed, T., Zhong, Y., Hussain, A. et al. Female Body Shape Classifications and Their Significant Impact on Fabric Utilization. Fibers Polym 19, 2642–2656 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8258-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8258-0