Skip to main content
Log in

Female Body Shape Classifications and Their Significant Impact on Fabric Utilization

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In apparel manufacturing, more than 50 % cost is consumed by the textile fabric. Therefore companies have significant apprehensions in the fabric utilization. It can result in more efficient and cost-effective in fabric utilization if they are related to different body shapes. The purpose of this study is to classify female body shapes and evaluate fabric utilization efficiency for each category of the body shape. To this end, three dimensional (3D) body scans are collected from 124 young female subjects. For the body shape analysis, 3D body scans are processed by using Moore neighbor algorithm and region prop function to perceive the outermost shell. Moreover, both front and side view of the scans is processed for data reduction using Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and clustering using K-Means ++. It has been observed through our analysis of a dataset that female bodies can be categorized into four body shapes, that is, oval shape, circle shape, triangle shape, and rectangle shape. It has also been observed that all four body shape categories exhibit dissimilar anthropometric size measures. The result implies that these body shapes have devoured different fabric utilization for the garments (fitted trouser and fitted shirt). It has been noted that in fitted trouser and fitted shirt the most effective is the rectangle shape (cluster 4) and the least is the circle shape (cluster 2) in the fabric consumption. Similarly, the fitted trousers utilize less fabric while the fitted shirts consume more fabric in all body shapes. These findings provide a better reference of fabric utilization and cost-effectiveness to the apparel manufacturers while producing garments for different categories of the body shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. E. Glock and G. I. Kunz, “Apparel Manufacturing: Sewn Product Analysis”, 4th ed., pp.173–183, Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. K. Wong and S. Y. S. Leung, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 114, 376 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D. M. Rose and D. R. Shier, Comput. Oper. Res., 34, 3209 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Z. Li and V. Milenkovic, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 84, 539 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Naveed, A. Hussain, and Y. Zhong, Text. Res. J., 88, 1571 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. E. Ko and S. Kim, Fiber. Polym., 14, 860 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. E. K. Burke, R. S. R. Hellier, G. Kendall, and G. Whitwell, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 179, 27 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D. A. Agbo and V. Igoli, IJSRISE, 1, 29 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Agbo, Nigeria Journal of Education, Health and Technology Research, 4, 1 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. Chattaraman, K. P. Simmons, and P. V. Ulrich, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 31, 291 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. H. Hsu, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 4185 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. B. Allen, B. Curless, and Z. Popovic, 03 ACM SIGGRAPH, 22, 587 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Okabe, N. Yamana, and K. Yamamoto, Journal of the Japan Research Association for Textile End-uses, 36, 42 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Otieno, G. Pisut, and L. Jo Connell, J. Fashion Marketing and Management, 11, 366 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. H. Bai and W. B. Zhang, J. Text. Res., China Text. Eng. Soc., 27, 113 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. B. Nascimento, J. Neiva de Figueiredo, S. F. Mayerle, P. R. Nascimento, and R. M. Casali, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 128, 379 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. L. Choi and Y. J. Nam, Hum. Factor Ergon. Man., 20, 378 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. X. Jing, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 27, 358 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Petrova and S. P. Ashdown, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 26, 227 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. G. Mori and J. Malik, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 28, 1052 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Nantel, J. Interact. Mark., 18, 73 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. P. Simmons, Ph. D. Dissertation, NCSU, North Carolina, 2003.

  23. K. Simmons, C. Istook, and P. Devarajan, J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag., 4, 1 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. K. Simmons and C. L. Istook, J. Text. Apparel, Technol. Manag., 4, 16 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. V. Arzu and B. Ender, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 23, 46 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. Knox, L. J. Connell, P. Ulrich, and G. Hutton, “Research Report for External Body”, NTU, Nottingham, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Yim Lee, C. L. Istook, Y. Ja Nam, and S. M. Park, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 19, 374 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. W. Lee and H. Imaoka, Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Tech., 22, 297 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. N. Kim, H. K. Song, S. Kim, and W. Do, Fiber. Polym., 19, 1781 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Goel and R. Tashakkori, Collaborative Mathematics and Statistics Research, 109, 161 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Yin, L. Xia, and C. Xu, J. Text. Res., China Text. Eng. Soc., 35, 113 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  32. M. J. Chung, H. F. Lin, and M. J. J. Wang, Int. J. Ind. Ergon., 37, 707 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. F. Xia, H. Xie, D. Li, G. Wu, and Y. Zhong, Journal of Textile Research, China Textile Engineering Society, 38, 86 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y. A. Nada and H. Meshref, Int. J. Comput., 105, 15 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. ASTM D5586/D5586M-10, Standard Tables of Body Measurements for Women Aged 55 and Older (All Figure Types), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2010.

  36. P. Komarkova and V. Glombikova, Tekst Konfeksiyon, 23, 409 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. H. Sohn and E. Bye, Cloth. Text. Res. J., 33, 64 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hutton, C. William, Malko, A. John, Fajman, and A. william, Aviat. Space Environ. Med., 74, 73 (2003).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. I. Riter, “The Science of Personal Dress Complete Study: Body Shapes”, 2nd ed., pp.151–157, Pleasanton, California, USA, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Y. Zhong, China Patent, ZL 200910194538.X (2009).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Zhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Naveed, T., Zhong, Y., Hussain, A. et al. Female Body Shape Classifications and Their Significant Impact on Fabric Utilization. Fibers Polym 19, 2642–2656 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8258-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-018-8258-0

Keywords

Navigation