Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Psychiatric Diagnosis 10 Years After the Publication of DSM-5: Update of its Impact on the Legal System

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ten years after the adoption of the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), and with the recent publication of a text revision (DSM-5-TR), the limitations of this system for diagnostic classification of mental disorders remain. However, given that the alternatives that have been proposed have their own serious problems, DSM is likely to be retained for some time to come. It is generally accepted by courts as reflecting expert opinion. This paper highlights problems with the reliability and validity of DSM diagnoses, the tendency to overdiagnosis of certain categories, leading to problems with the use of these criteria in the courts, both in criminal and civil laws. The review argues that the categories in the DSM should be considered heuristics, not as disease entities equivalent to medical diagnoses supported by biomarkers and endophenotypes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (1980). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd ed.). American Psychiatric Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text revision). American Psychiatric Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchaine, T. P., & Constantino, J. N. (2017). Redefining the endophenotype concept to accommodate transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and etiological complexity. Biomarkers in Medicine, 11, 769–790.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Denny-Keys, M., & Sells, J. R. (2011). Parental personality disorder and its effects on children: A review of current literature. Journal of Child Custody, 8(4), 268–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frances, A. (2013). Saving normal. Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances, A. (2014). RDoC is necessary, but very oversold. World Psychiatry, 13, 47–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Frances, A., & Halon, R. (2013). The uses and misuses of the DSM in forensic settings. Psychological Injury and Law, 6, 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glahn, D. C., Knowles, E. E., Mckay, D. R., Sprooten, E., et al. (2014). Arguments for the sake of endophenotypes: Examining common misconceptions about the use of endophenotypes in psychiatric genetics. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 165B, 122–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, F., & Jamison, K. R. (2007). Manic-depressive illness: Bipolar disorders and recurrent depression. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutheil, T., & Appelbaum, P. (Eds.). (2019). Clinical handbook of psychiatry and the law (5th ed.). Wolters Kluver.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. (2019). Mind fixers: Psychiatry’s troubled search for the biology of mental illness. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, N. (2016). Concept creep: Psychology’s expanding concepts of harm and pathology. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C., Mulay, A. L., & Waugh, M. H. (Eds.). (2019). The DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders: Integrating multiple paradigms of personality assessment. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopwood, C., & Sellborn, C. (2013). Implications of DSM-5 personality traits for forensic psychology. Psychological Injury and Law, 6, 314–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V. (2018). PTSD. Johns Hopkins Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V. (2021). DSM: A history of psychiatry’s bible. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V. (2023). Personality disorders. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, A. V., & Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The loss of sadness: How psychiatry transformed normal sorrow into depressive disorder. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. (2022). Healing: Our Path From Mental Illness To Mental Health. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. R. (2014). The NIMH research domain criteria (RDoC) project: Precision medicine for psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 395–397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insel, T. R., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., et al. (2010). Research domain criteria (RDoC): Toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 748–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotov, R., Krueger, R. F., Watson, D., Achenbach, T. M., Althoff, R. R., Bagby, R. M., & Zimmerman, M. (2017). The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): A dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 454–477.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, D. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Regier, D. A. (2013). DSM-5: The future arrived. JAMA, 309, 1691–1692.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Low, P. W., Jeffries, J. C., & Bonnie, R. J. (1986). Trial of John W Hinckley, Jr - A case study in the insanity defense. Foundation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffitt, T. E., Houts, R., Asherson, P., Belsky, D. W., Corcoran, D. L., & Caspi, A. (2015). Is adult ADHD a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder? Evidence from a four-decade longitudinal cohort study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 172, 967–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olfson, M., Blanco, C., Wang, S., & Greenhill, L. L. (2013). Trends in office-based treatment of adults with stimulants in the United States. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 74(1), 43–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, R. K., & Edens, J. F. (2005). Parenting capacity. In T. Grisso (Ed.), Evaluating competencies. Perspectives in law & psychology. (Vol. 16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47922-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ozomaro, U., Wahlestedt, C., & Nemeroff, C. B. (2013). (2013): Personalized medicine in psychiatry: Problems and promises. BMC Medicine, 11, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-132

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J. (2015). The intelligent clinician’s guide to DSM-5 (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J. (2020). Overdiagnosis in psychiatry (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J. (2023). Myths of trauma. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J., Bhat, V., & Thombs, B. (2015). Is adult ADHD being over-diagnosed? Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 324–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J., & Black, D. (2015). Borderline personality disorder and bipolar disorder—What is the difference and why does it matter? The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 203, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, J., & Kirmayer, L. (2016). The NIMH research domain criteria: A bridge too far. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases, 204, 26–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraekere, H. C., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013). DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, part II: Test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 59–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rødgaard, E., Jensen, K., Vergnes, J., Soulières, I., & Mottron, L. (2019). Temporal changes in effect sizes of studies comparing individuals with and without Autism: A meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiatry, 76, 1124–1132.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, K. R., Townsend, M. L., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2020). Parenting stress and competence in borderline personality disorder is associated with mental health, trauma history, attachment and reflective capacity. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 7, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-020-00124-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, L. C. (2013). The DSM-5 and forensic relationship status: It’s complicated. Psychological Injury and the Law, 6, 324–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrer, P., & Mulder, R. (2022). Personality disorder: From evidence to understanding. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2018). International classification of diseases: Mental disorders (11th ed.). WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, G. (2013). Breaking bad: DSM-5 description, criticisms, and recommendations. Psychological Injury and the Law, 6, 345–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, G., & Drogin, E. Y. (2013). Psychological injury and law I: Causality, malingering, and PTSD. Mental Health Law & Policy Journal, 3, 373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M., Chelminski, I., & Young, D. (2008). The frequency of personality disorders in psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31, 405–420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. McGill University, Montreal, Canada

    Joel Paris

Authors
  1. Joel Paris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joel Paris.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Paris, J. Psychiatric Diagnosis 10 Years After the Publication of DSM-5: Update of its Impact on the Legal System. Psychol. Inj. and Law (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-024-09502-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-024-09502-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation