Skip to main content
Log in

A Review of Reasons for Inconsistency in Testimonies of Torture Victims

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The encounter between torture victims and the legal system is mostly dismissive. Thus, victims have repeatedly submitted complaints regarding alleged torture to the relevant authorities, but these cases are often rejected. A common reason for rejection is the inconsistency within and between testimonies, which can give the impression that the victim is fabricating the story and then undermines the legal case. This paper reviews the reasons that could explain the disparities in the testimonies of torture survivors. It relates to six facets that, taken together, increase the likelihood of inconsistency: (a) detention and interrogation, (b) flaws in normal memory, (c) psychological processes, (d) physical/medical aspects, (e) sociocultural factors, and (f) interview barriers. Examples are provided for each of these reasons for the discrepancy in testimonies. A discussion of the relevance in the field of psychological injury follows this. The study provides recommendations for legal and medical experts working with torture and other traumatized victims regarding the use of the Istanbul Protocol, collaboration, and education to enhance understanding, clarify inconsistencies in testimonies, and support cases in court.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their appreciation for the esteemed input of Dr. Rachel Stroumsa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The first author commenced this review and drafted an initial version of the text. The second author joined later and, since then, took full part in all aspects, including the literature study and critical revisions of the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. N. Weishut.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Both authors are on the Board of the Public Committee of Torture in Israel, the second author being the Chair of this NGO.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weishut, D.N., Steiner-Birmanns, B. A Review of Reasons for Inconsistency in Testimonies of Torture Victims. Psychol. Inj. and Law 17, 88–98 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-024-09498-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-024-09498-4

Keywords

Navigation