Skip to main content
Log in

The Ruff Neurobehavioral Inventory: Validity Indicators and Validity

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the test validity of the respondent validity scales of the Ruff neurobehavioral inventory (RNBI). In a private practice sample of motor vehicle accident pain patients (n = 54) without neurologic injury, the scores obtained for these scales were compared with and correlated with equivalent ones on the Millon clinical multi-axial inventory III (MCMI III) and the Detailed assessment of post-traumatic stress (DAPS). Results revealed that there was a consistent pattern of convergence and divergence in response styles across the three instruments. In terms of the RNBI interscale correlations, in particular, the results suggested that premorbid positive impression management and postmorbid negative impression management are related in this type of sample. These findings add to the concurrent validity of the RNBI, suggesting that the instrument provides relevant incremental information about the type of population studied. Limitations of the study and ideas for future research were discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briere, J. (2001). Detailed assessment of posttraumatic stress: Professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, J. N., Graham, J. R., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Tellegen, A., Dahlstrom, W. G., & Kaemmer, B. (2001). MMPI-2: Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation, revised edition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2003). Manual for the word memory test for Microsoft windows. Edmonton: Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. (2005). Green’s Medical symptom validity test for windows: User’s manual and program. Edmonton: Green’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halligan, P. W., Bass, C., & Oakley, D. A. (2003). Malingering and illness deception. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, T., Davis, R., & Millon, C. (1997). The Millon clinical multiaxial inventory III manual. Minneapolis: National Computer Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R., Bagby, R. M., & Dickens, S. E. (1992). Structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS) and professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, R. M., & Hibbard, K. (2003). Ruff neurobehavioral inventory professional manual. Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (2006). Statistical package for the social sciences. Chicago: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). TOMM: The Test of memory malingering. North Tonawanda: MultiHealth Systems.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald Young.

Additional information

Paul Richards served as action editor as well as reviewer for this article. We thank him as well as another reviewer for their helpful comments. Matthew Dubins and Kaitlyn Chambers helped in the data analysis.

The first author’s work has been supported by course leaves granted by both Glendon College and York University and editorial grants from Springer Science + Business Media.

In terms of possible conflicts of interest, the first author has obtained most of his attorney referrals and psycholegal referrals from plaintiff rather than defense attorneys and assessment companies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, G., Merali, N.L. & Ruff, R.M. The Ruff Neurobehavioral Inventory: Validity Indicators and Validity. Psychol. Inj. and Law 2, 53–60 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9030-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-009-9030-y

Keywords

Navigation