Skip to main content
Log in

Hydrodynamic model of interfacial area for trickling flow in a packed bed

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To predict local interfacial area in a packed bed under the trickling flow, a wavy annular flow model was developed by introducing the shape of waves in a thin liquid film. The trickling flowin a packed bed was approximated by an annular flow through a number of equivalent channels in which the continuous gas and liquid were completely separated by a wavy interface. Film thicknesses were measured by parallel wire probes to estimate the wave structure on the interface. By integrating the interfacial areas over a certain time period, the time-averaged local interfacial area was evaluated from a low to high interaction flow regime: 1) from trickling to bubbly flow and 2) from trickling to pulsing flow. The interfacial area predicted by the wavy annular flow model in the trickling flow was moderately higher than those predicted with the empirical correlations developed by others. The results show that the interfacial area increases more significantly as the flow regime changes from trickling to pulsing flow than that increases as the flow regime changes from trickling to bubbly flow. As a result, the wave structure on the interface should be considered to predict more accurate interfacial area in a packed bed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. M. Ng, A model for flow-regime transitions in cocurrent down-flow trickle-bed reactors, AIChE Journal, 32 (1986) 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. F. Larachi, M. Cassanello, A. Laurent, N. Midoux and G. Wild, Gas-liquid interfacial areas in three-phase fixed bed reactors, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 36 (1997) 497–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Midoux, B. I. Morsi, M. Purwasasmita, A. Laurent and J. C. Charpentier, Interfacial area and liquid side mass transfer coefficient in trickle bed reactors operating with organic liquids, Chemical Engineering Science, 39 (1984) 781–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. R. G. S. Venkata, N. D. Venkata and Y. B. G. Varma, A correlation for interfacial area in co-current gas-liquid downflow through packed beds, Bioprocess Engineering, 10 (1994) 53–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Iliuta, F. Larachi and M. H. Al-Dahhan, Double-Slit model for partially wetted trickle flow hydrodynamics, AIChE Journal, 46 (2000) 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. T. Revankar, Pore scale model for flow regime transition in a trickle bed reactor, Chem. Eng. Comm., 184 (2001) 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Attou and G. Ferschneider, A two-fluid hydrodynamic model for the transition between trickle and pulse flow in a cocurrent gas-liquid packed-bed reactor, Chemical Engineering Science, 55 (2000) 491–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. J. Molga and K. R. Westerterp, Experimental study of a cocurrent upflow packed bed bubble column reactor: pressure drop, holdup, and interfacial area, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 36 (1997) 489–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. J. Motil, V. Balakotaiah and Y. Kamotani, Gas-liquid two-phase flow through packed bed in microgravity, AIChE Journal, 49 (2003) 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. B. I. Morsi, N. Midoux, A. Laurent and J. C. Charpentier, Hydrodynamics and interfacial areas in downward cocurrent gas-liquid flow through fixed beds. Influence of the nature of the liquid, International Chemical Engineering, 22 (1982) 142–151.

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Kocamustafaogullari and M. Ishii, Foundation of the interfacial area transport equation and its closure relations, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 38 (1995) 481–493.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Kim, Interfacial area transport equation and measurement of local interfacial characteristics, Ph.D. Thesis, Nuclear engineering at Purdue University (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  13. X. Sun, Two-group interfacial area transport equation for a confined test section, Ph.D. Thesis, Nuclear engineering at Purdue University (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. F. Macdonald, M. S. El-Sayed, K. Mow and F. A. L. Dullien, Flow through porous media: the Ergun equation revisited, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 18 (1979) 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K. Grosser, R. G. Carbonell and S. Sundaresan, Onset of pulsing in two-phase concurrent downflow through a packed bed, AIChE Journal, 34 (1988) 1850–1860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. T. Revankar, H. Olenik, D. Jo and B. Motil, Local instrumentation for the investigation of multi-phase parameters in a packed bed, Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineering, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 221 (2007) 187–199.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. W. Swanson, Characteristics of the gas-liquid interface in two-phase annular flow, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Delaware (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daeseong Jo.

Additional information

Daeseong Jo is an assistant professor in the School of Mechanical Engineering at Kyungpook National University. He received his Ph.D. degree in nuclear engineering from Purdue University, M.S. degree in aerospace engineering from Purdue University, and B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from University of Connecticut. His research interests are two-phase flows, phase change during boiling and condensation, heat transfer, and nuclear safety.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, D. Hydrodynamic model of interfacial area for trickling flow in a packed bed. J Mech Sci Technol 30, 171–178 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1220-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-1220-9

Keywords

Navigation