Skip to main content
Log in

Robust multiobjective optimization method using satisficing trade-off method

  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study proposes a robust multiobjective optimization approach using the satisficing tradeoff method (STOM). STOM is a multiobjective optimization method that obtains a highly accurate single Pareto solution. Conventionally, a robust design is formulated as a single-objective optimization problem, where the objective function is defined as the weighted sum of the mean and standard deviation of the performance index. In this study, the mean and standard deviation are formulated as individual objective function. The effect of uncertainty can be investigated through Pareto surface. In STOM, the multiobjective optimization problem is transformed into the equivalent single objective problem by introducing an aspiration level. As the obtained single Pareto solution corresponds to the aspiration level that implies the ratio of the designer's desired objective function, the designer can investigate only the desired space in detail through setting the aspiration without obtaining full Pareto surfaces. The validity of using STOM for a robust multiobjective optimization problem is discussed using numerical examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Park, T. Lee, K. Lee and K. Hwang, Robust design: An overview, AIAA Journal, 44 (1) (2006) 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Beyer and B. Sendhoff, Robust optimization–A comprehensive survey, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 196 (33–34) (2007) 3190–3218.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. K. M. Mittinen, Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Nakayama and Y. Sawaragi, Satisficing trade-off method for multiobjective programming, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 229 (1984) 113–122.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Nakayama, K. Kaneshige, S. Takemoto and Y. Watada, An application of a multiobjective programming technique to construction accuracy control of cable stayed bridges, European. Journal of Operational Research, 83 (3) (1995) 731–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. Kitayama and K. Yamazaki, Compromise point incorporating trade-off ratio in multiobjective optimization, Applied Soft Computing, 12 (8) (2012) 1959–1964.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. H. Nakayama, Trade-off analysis using parametric optimization techniques, European. Journal of Operational Research, 60 (1) (1992) 87–98.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. H-S. Ang and W. H. Tang, Probabilistic concepts in engineering planning and design, Vol. 1, Basic Principles, John Wiley & Sons (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. Chen, M. M. Wiecek and J. Zhang, Quality utility — A compromise programming approach to robust design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 121 (2) (1999) 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. T. Haftka and Z. Gürdal, Elements of structural optimization, Kluwer Academic Publishers (1992).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nozomu Kogiso.

Additional information

Recommended by Guest Editor Joo-Ho Choi

Masahiro Toyoda is presently M.S. candidate in Department of Aerospace Engineering at Osaka Prefecture University in Japan. He received his B.S. degree in aerospace engineering from Osaka Prefecture University, Japan in 2012. His research interest is multiobjective optimization and its application to aerospace structural systems.

Nozomu Kogiso is presently an Associate Professor in Department of Aerospace Engineering at Osaka Prefecture University in Japan. He received his B.S. degree in physics from Nagoya University, Japan in 1988 and his M.S. and Dr. Eng. from Osaka Prefecture University in 1994 and 1997, respectively. His research interests include robust and reliability-based design optimization.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Toyoda, M., Kogiso, N. Robust multiobjective optimization method using satisficing trade-off method. J Mech Sci Technol 29, 1361–1367 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0305-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0305-9

Keywords

Navigation