Skip to main content
Log in

Research on Comparative of Multi-Surrogate Models to Optimize Complex Truss Structures

  • Structural Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

Surrogate models have been proven to be reliable and effective methods for the application of engineering problems. This article presents a comparative study of three common surrogate models Polynomial Response Surface (PRS), Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network, and Kriging model in terms of optimization. For the optimization of plane 10-bar truss structure and 25 bar space truss, the effectiveness of the surrogate model algorithm is verified by different surrogate models. Finally for a typical complex truss structure such as lattice boom of crawler crane, the Optimal Latin Hypercube Design (OLHD) is used to sample the optimized sample points for fitting and interpolation of three surrogate models and analyzing their errors, in order to get better surrogate effect, PRS is combined with RBF Neural Network, and secondly, the global optimization algorithm (Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm, MIGA) and gradient algorithm (Modified Method of Feasible Directions, MMFD) are used to optimize the fitted four surrogate models. Through the comparison of the optimization results, the optimization of PRS-RBF combined surrogate model using MIGA-MMFD algorithm instead of finite element model optimization has good stability and reliability. The total mass of the optimized model has been reduced by 24.47%. The number of optimization iterations is within 250 generations. The new method proposed in this paper can greatly promote the reduction of the period of analysis and optimization of engineering structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

APSO:

Adaptive Particle Swarm Optimization

d t :

An appropriate step size

DOE:

Design of Experiment

EPSO:

Evolutionary Particle Swarm Optimization

G h3 :

Anti-overturning performance parameters of crawler crane

HPSO:

Harmonious Particle Swarm Optimization

HPSSO:

Hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization and Swallow Swarm Optimization

LHD:

Latin Hypercube Design

M 0 :

The overturning moment

MAPE:

Maximum Absolute Percentage Error

MIGA:

Multi-Island Genetic Algorithm

MMFD:

Modified Method of Feasible Directions

M s :

The stabilizing moment

MSPSO:

Multiple Swarm Particle Swarm Optimization

n :

The number of design variables

OLHD:

Optimal Latin Hypercube Design

PRS:

Polynomial Response Surface

PSO:

Particle Swarm Optimization

R 2 :

R-squared Error

R :

A symmetric correlation matrix

RBF:

Radial Basis Function

RMSE:

Root Mean Square Error

R(x i, x j):

The correlation kernel function

S k :

Feasible direction

x i :

The i-th component of m-dimensional independent variable x

Y :

Esponse value of the model

Y max :

The maximum displacement of the head of the crawler crane boom

[Y]:

The maximum displacement specified in the specification

y i :

The true value at the validation point

β 0, β i and β ij :

Each coefficient, It can be expressed as β vector

ε :

The error at the unknown point

σ max :

The maximum stress

[σ]:

The maximum permissible stress

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Shanxi provincial Key Research and Development Project, China [201903D121067], the Fund for Shanxi ‘1331 Project’ Key Subjects Construction (1331KSC). Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51478290).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chongjian Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Yang, J. & Qin, Y. Research on Comparative of Multi-Surrogate Models to Optimize Complex Truss Structures. KSCE J Civ Eng 28, 2268–2278 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-0196-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-0196-3

Keywords

Navigation