Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structural Equation Modeling to Analyze the Critical Driving Factors and Paths for Off-site Construction in China

  • Construction Management
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Off-site Construction (OSC) is an alternative to conventional construction. However, China lags behind developed countries in terms of its OSC development. The chief goal of this study is to demonstrate the critical driving forces and solutions that promote OSC development. A total of 21 hypotheses are established to present the interrelations among eight driving forces. Based on 176 valid responses from developers in mainland China, a structural equation model is built to explore the key solutions and the critical driving forces. Most driving forces, such as Pursuit of Sustainable Competitiveness (PSC), Governmental Policies and Regulations (GPR), Technological Innovation (TI), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), and Construction Market Demand (CMD), can affect a Corporation’s Willingness and Behavior (CWB) in adopting OSC through two mediating factors, namely, Economic Benefits (EB) and social and environmental benefits. The findings highlight five main driving solutions to promote OSC, namely, “PSC → EB → CWB,” “PSC → TI → EB → CWB,” “GPR → TI → EB → CWB,” “GPR → CSR → CWB,” and “GPR → CMD → CWB.” Governments and project clients are also identified as important players in the development of OSC in China. These results provide a valuable reference for the government to understand the underlying interrelationships among the driving forces and key solutions to the development of OSC in China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anvuur, A. M. and Kumaraswamy, M. M. (2011). “Measurement and antecedents of cooperation in construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 138, No. 7, pp. 797–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, M. and Egbu, C. (2010). “Making a case for offsite construction in China.” Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 17, No. 6, pp. 536–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aye, L., Ngo, T., Crawford, R., Gammampila, R., and Mendis, P. (2012). “Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 47, pp. 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (2012). “Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models.” Journal of the Academy Of Marketing Science, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 8–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, A., Poon, C. S., Shen, L.Y., Austin, S., and Wong, I. (2009). “Designing out waste in high-rise residential buildings: Analysis of precasting methods and traditional construction.” Renewable energy, Vol. 34, No. 9, pp. 2067–2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beerepoot, M. and Beerepoot, N. (2007). “Government regulation as an impetus for innovation: Evidence from energy performance regulation in the Dutch residential building sector.” Energy Policy, Vol. 35, No. 10, pp. 4812–4825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. and Chou, C. P. (1987). “Practical issues in structural modeling.” Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 78–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blayse, A. M. and Manley, K. (2004). “Key influences on construction innovation.” Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blismas, N. and Wakefield, R. (2009). “Drivers, constraints and the future of offsite manufacture in Australia.” Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 72–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blismas, N. G., Pendkebury, M., Gibb, A., and Pasquire, C. (2005). “Constraints to the use of off-site production on construction projects.” Architectural Engineering and Design Management, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 153–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwers, B. and Jacke, H. E. (2010). “Corporate sustainability and innovation in SMEs: evidence of themes and activities in practice.” Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 417–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. (2013), Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Routledge.

  • Chan, A. P. C., Lam, P. T. I., Chan, D. W. M., Cheung, E., and Ke, Y. J. (2009). “Drivers for adopting public private partnerships—empirical comparison between china and hong kong special administrative region.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-ASCE, Vol. 11, pp. 1115–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, Y. H., Chan, E. H.W., and Lok, L. K. L. (2006). “Prefabrication and barriers to entry—a case study of public housing and institutional buildings in Hong Kong.” Habitat International, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinda, T. and Mohamed, S. (2008). “Structural equation model of construction safety culture.” Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CIB (2013). “CIB working commission W119-Exploring construction industrialization in China: the status quo and the challenges.” (CIB Publication 368), pp. http://www.cibworld.nl/site/commissions/index. html.

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). “How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions.” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doloi, H., Sawhney, A., Lyer, K. C., and Rentala, S. (2012). “Analysing factors affecting delays in Indian construction projects.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C., Malerba, F., Metcalfe, S., Montobbio, F., and Steinmueller, E. (2004). “Sectoral systems: Implications for European innovation policy.” in F. Malerba (ed.), Sectoral Systems of Innovation in Europe-Concepts, Issues and Analyses of Six Major Sectors in Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge Univeristy Press), pp. 427–461.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, J. (1998). Rethinking construction: Department of Environment, Transport and the Region.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egmond, E. L. C. V. and Scheublin, F. J. M. (2005). “Successful Industrialization, innovation and prefabrication in construction.” COMBINING FORCES-Advancing Facilities Management and Construction through Innovation, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gann, D. M. and Salter, A. J. (2000). “Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems.” Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 7, pp. 955–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gann, D. M., Wang, Y., and Hawkins, R. (1998). “Do regulations encourage innovation?-the case of energy efficiency in housing.” Building Research & Information, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 280–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. and Isack, F. (2003). “Re-engineering through pre-assembly: client expectations and drivers.” Building Research & Information, Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 146–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girmscheid, G. (2010), New perspective in industrialisation in construction: A state-of-the-art report; CIB Task Group 57" Industrialisation in Construction": Eigenverl. des IBB an d. ETH Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodier, C. and Gibb, A. (2007). “Future opportunities for offsite in the UK.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 585–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G. (2009). “Research on the development context of housing industrialization.” PhD Thesis, Tongji University (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • HKBD (2001). Joint Practice Note No.1, Green and innovative buildings, Hong Kong Buildings Department, Hong Kong.

  • HKBD (2002). Joint Practice Note No.2, Second Package of Incentives to Promote Green and Innovative Building, Hong Kong Building Department, Hong Kong.

  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, M. (2008). “Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit.” Articles, pp. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon, L. and Poon, C. S. (2008). “Sustainable construction aspects of using prefabrication in dense urban environment: A Hong Kong case study.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 9, pp. 953–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaillon, L. and Poon, C. S. (2009). “The evolution of prefabricated residential building systems in Hong Kong: A review of the public and the private sector.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Y. (2010). The research of Industrialized Building Development, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, W. (2007). Lessons from Japan: A comparative study of the market drivers for prefabrication in Japanese and UK private housing development, University College London, Unite Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamar, K. Alshawi, M., and Hamid, Z. (2009). “Barriers to Industrialized Building System (IBS): The case of Malaysia.” In BuHu 9th International Postgraduate Research Conference (IPGRC), Salford, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. W., Azarin, R., Yi, J. S., and Bae, J. (2013). “Environmental impacts comparison between on-site vs. prefabricated Just-In-Time (prefab-JIT) rebar supply in construction projects.” Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 647–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. R. (2015). “Using Modularized Building System to Promote the Level of Industrialized Building in China.” <http://archcy.com/ point/gdbl/35ed7be0073a3092>.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z. D., Shen, Q. P., Ji, C., and Hong, J. K. (2014). “Stakeholder-based analysis of drivers and constraints in the use of off-site construction.” ICCREM 2014@ sSmart Construction and Management in the Context of New Technology (ASCE), pp. 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Mesa, B., Pitarch, A., Tomas, A., and Gallego, T. (2009). “Comparison of environmental impacts of building structures with in situ cast floors and with precast concrete floors.” Building and Environment, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 699–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, H. and Smith, S. J. (2010). “Agencement in housing markets: The case of the UK construction industry.” Geoforum, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 457–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, S. and Yan, H. (2007). “An empirical study on incentives of strategic partnering in China: Views from construction companies.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 241–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mak, Y. W. (1998). “Prefabrication and industrialization of housing in Hong Kong.” Masters thesis, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C., Shen, Q. P., Shen, L. Y., and Tang, L. Y. (2013a). “Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: Two case studies of residential projects.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 66, pp. 165–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao, C., Shen, Q. P., Wei, P., and Ye, K. H. (2013b). “Major barriers to off-site construction: the developer’s perspective in China.” Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 04014043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P. and Ho, M. H. R. (2002). “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.” Psychological Methods, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGraw-Hill (2011). “McGraw-Hill Construction.Prefabrication and Modularization: Increasing Productivity in the Construction Industry.” New York.

  • Molenaar, K., Washington, S., and Diekmann, J. (2000). “Structural equation model of construction contract dispute potential.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 126, No. 4, pp. 268–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. (1979). “The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies.” Research policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 102–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadim, W. and Goulding, J. S. (2010). “Offsite production in the UK: The way forward? A UK construction industry perspective.” Construction Innovation: Information, Process, Management, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 181–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCRE (2015). “Higher cost hindering the promotion of building industrilization in China.” Newpaper of China Real Estate(NCRE), Beijing, China.

  • NDRC/DHUC (2013}). “Green building Action Planning [No.1].” General Office of the State Council, China

  • Ong, T. F. and Musa, G. (2012). “Examining the influences of experience, personality and attitude on SCUBA divers’ underwater behaviour: A structural equation model.” Tourism Management, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 1521–1534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W. and Sidwell, R. (2011). “Demystifying the cost barriers to offsite construction in the UK.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 29, No. 11, pp. 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, W., Gibb, A. F., and Dainty, A. R. J. (2007). “Perspective of UK housebuilders on the use of offsite modern methods of construction.” Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 183–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., Waterman, R. H., and Jones, I. (1982). “In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons, O. and Wadel, G. (2011). “Environmental impacts of prefabricated school buildings in Catalonia.” Habitat International, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2008). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance: Simon and Schuster, Vol. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982). Inside the black box: Technology and economics: Cambridge University Press, United Kindom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S. and Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, C. B. (1986b). “Potential mechanisms for construction innovation.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 112, No. 2, pp. 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, C. B. (1989). “Organizing to increase innovation in construction firms.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 115, No. 4, pp. 602–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, C. B., Vanegas, J. A., and Williams, J. M. (1986a). Constructability improvement using prefabrication, pre-assembly andmodularization, Construction Industry Institute, Stanford University: California, Technical report No. 297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. W (1963). “BI-POLAR AND UNIDIRECTIONAL SCALES.” British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. (1974). “Innovation in industry and the diffusion of technology.” Science, Vol. 183, No. 4125, pp. 620–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M. and Abernathy, W. J. (1975). “A dynamic model of process and product innovation.” Omega, Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 639–656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washington, S. P., Karlaftis, M. G., and Mannering, F. L. (2010). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis: CRC press.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Phil and Holme, Lord (1999). “Meeting changing expectations: Corporate social responsibility.” World Business Council for Sustainable Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Won, I., Na, Y., Kin, J. T., and Kim, S. (2013). “Energy-efficient algorithms of the steam curing for the in situ production of precast concrete members.” Energy and Buildings, Vol. 64, pp. 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (1921). “Correlation and causation.” Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp. 557–585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, B., Skitmore, M., and Xia, B. (2015). “A critical review of structural equation modeling applications in construction research.” Automation in Construction, Vol. 49, pp. 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, B., Skitmore, M., Xia, B., Masrom, M. A., Ye, K., and Bridge, A. (2014). “Examining the influence of participant performance factors on contractor satisfaction: A structural equation model.” International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 482–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zenko, Z. and Mulej, M. (2011). “Diffusion of innovative behaviour with social responsibility.” Kybernetes, Vol. 40, Nos. 9–10, pp. 1258–1272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Construction Management and Real Estate, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Chao Mao, Guiwen Liu & Liyin Shen

  2. International Research Center of Sustainable Built Environment, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Chao Mao, Guiwen Liu & Liyin Shen

  3. School of Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Xiangyu Wang & Jun Wang

Authors
  1. Chao Mao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guiwen Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Liyin Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiangyu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Mao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mao, C., Liu, G., Shen, L. et al. Structural Equation Modeling to Analyze the Critical Driving Factors and Paths for Off-site Construction in China. KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 2678–2690 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1705-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1705-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation