Abstract
This paper describes some details of a self-balanced earthquake simulator on the centrifuge in KAIST and results of a series of proof tests for verifying its dynamic performance and excitation capacity. The main feature of the earthquake simulator is the dynamic self-balancing technique adopted to eliminate a large portion of the undesired reaction forces and vibrations transmitted to the centrifuge main body. This feature is achieved by embarking counter-weight platform and two back-to-back hydraulic bearings. The maximum base shaking acceleration of the earthquake simulator is 20 g in horizontal direction under 40 g of centrifuge acceleration with a maximum payload of 700 kg, corresponding to 0.5 g of horizontal shaking acceleration in the prototype scale. The loading frequency ranges from 40 Hz to 200 Hz (300 Hz) for sinusoidal (real earthquake) inputs. The dimension of slip table is 670 mm × 670 m in length and width. The proof test results show that the earthquake simulator can reproduce mono-frequency sinusoidal inputs in a wide band of frequencies as well as multi-frequency real earthquake inputs at the bottom of soil models with satisfactory fidelity, and the dynamic self-balancing contributes to the safety of the centrifuge structure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chazelas, J. L., Escoffier, S., Garnier, J., Thorel, L., and Rault, G. (2008). “Original technologies for proven performances for the new LCPC earthquake simulator.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 723–728.
Elgamal, A., Yang, Z., Lai, T., Kutter, B. L., and Wilson, D. W. (2005). “Dynamic response of saturated dense sand in laminated centrifuge container.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 131, No. 5, pp. 598–609.
Ghosh, B. and Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2007). “Centrifuge modelling of seismic soil structure interaction effects.” Nuclear Engineering and Design., Vol. 237, No. 8, pp. 887–896.
Hutin, C., Perdriat, J., and Rames, D. (2002). “Dynamically balanced broad frequency earthquake simulation.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: ICPMG’02, July 10–12, Newfoundland, Canada, pp. 175–178.
Kim, D. S., Kim, N. R., Choo, Y. W., and Cho, G. C. (2013). “A newly developed state-of-the-art geotechnical centrifuge in Korea.” KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 77–84.
Kutter, B. L., Idriss, I. M., Khonke, T., Lakeland, J., Li, X. S., Sluis, W., Zeng, X., Tauscher, R. C., Goto, Y., and Kubodera, L. (1994). “Design of a large earthquake simulator at UC Davis.” Centrifuge 94-Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 94, Singapore, pp. 169–175.
Kutter, B. L. and Wilson, D. W. (2006). “Physical modelling of dynamic behavior of soil-foundation-superstructure systems.” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechmics, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1–12.
Lee, S. H., Choo, Y. W., and Kim, D. S. (2013). “Performance of an Equivalent Shear Beam (ESB) model container for dynamic geotechnical centrifuge tests.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 44, pp. 102–114.
Perdriat, J., Phillips, R., Nicolas Font, J., and Hutin, C. (2002). “Dynamically balanced broad frequency earthquake simulation system.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: ICPMG’02, July 10–12, Newfoundland, Canada, pp. 169–173.
Schofield, A. N. and Zeng, X. (1992). Design and performance of an equivalent shear beam (ESB) container for earthquake centrifuge modelling, Technical Report TR245, Cambridge: Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge.
Shen, C. K., Li, X. S., Ng, C. W. W., Van Laak, P. A., Kutter, B. L., Cappel, K., and Tauscher, R. C. (1998). “Development of a geotechnical centrifuge in Hong Kong.” Centrifuge 98-Proceedings of the International Conference Centrifuge 98, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 13–18.
Takemura, J., Takahashi, A., and Aoki, Y. (2002). “Development of horizontal-vertical 2D shaker in a centrifuge.” Proceedings of the International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: ICPMG’02, July 10–12, Newfoundland, Canada, pp. 163–168.
Taylor, R. N. (1995). Geotechnical centrifuge technology, 1st Edition, Blackie Academic and Professional.
Ueng, T. S., Wu, C. W., Cheng, H. W., and Chen, C. H. (2010). “Settlements of saturated clean sand deposits in shaking table tests.” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 30, Nos. 1–2, pp. 50–60.
Wood, D. M., Crewe, A., and Taylor, C. (2002). “Shaking table testing of geotechnical models.” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechmics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
Yu, Y., Deng, L., Sun, X., and Lu, H. (2008). “Centrifuge modeling of a dry sandy slope response to earthquake loading.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 447–461.
Zehgal, M., Dobry, R., Abdoun, T., Zimmie, T. F., and Elgamal, A. (2002). “NEES earthquake simulation and networking capabilities at RPI centrifuge.” Proceedings of the 7th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering (7NCEE), July 21–25, Boston, USA (in CD-ROM).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, DS., Lee, SH., Choo, Y.W. et al. Self-balanced earthquake simulator on centrifuge and dynamic performance verification. KSCE J Civ Eng 17, 651–661 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1591-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-013-1591-3