Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic difference between internal and external turret-moored FLNG

  • Published:
Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University (Science) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Motion responses of the floating liquefied natural gas (FLNG) hull and the mooring loads in a 100-year return environmental condition are predicted with the help of the well known coupled dynamic analysis code DeepC. A ship-shaped turret-moored FLNG moored by 4×3 chain-polyester-chain lines in 1.5 km depth of water is studied. Two types of turrets such as internal and external turrets, resulting from different locations of the turrets, are adopted respectively in the numerical simulations. Motion responses of the FLNG hull and forces of the mooring lines obtained from the internal turret case and external turret case are compared with each other. Significant differences are obtained. Statistic analysis is also used to analyze the comparison results, and effects of the turret location on the FLNG hydrodynamic characteristics are summed up. The conclusion regarding the hydrodynamic differences between internal and external turret-moored FLNG systems would provide help for design of the FLNG system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kim J W, Jim O S, Atle S, et al. Global performance and sloshing analysis of a new deep-draft semisubmersible LNG FPSO [C]// Proc 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Estoril, Portugal: ASME, 2008: 881–889.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mravak Z, Lauzon J D, Chung Y S, et al. Strength assessment of membrane LNG tank structure based on direct calculation of structural response [C]// Proc 28th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. Hawaii, USA: ASME, 2009: 767–774.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graczyk M, Moan T. Structural response to sloshing excitation in membrane LNG tank [J]. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 2011, 133(2): 103–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. White J, Longley H. FLNG technology shows promise for stranded gas fields [J]. Offshore, 2009, 69(11): 78–79.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wichers J EW. A simulation model for a single point moored tanker [D]. Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University of Technology, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sphaier S H, Fernandes A C, Correa S H. Maneuvering model for the FPSO horizontal plane behavior [C]// Proc 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Seattle, USA: ISOPE, 2000: 334–337.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee D H, Choi H S. A dynamic analysis of FPSOshuttle tanker system [C]// Proc 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Seattle, USA: ISOPE, 2000: 302–307.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Munipalli J, Pistani F, Thiagarajan K P, et al. Weathervaning instabilities of a FPSO in regular waves and consequence on response amplitude operators [C]// Proc 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. San Diego, USA: ASME, 2007: 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee S J. The effects of LNG-sloshing on the global responses of LNG-carriers [D]. Texas, USA: Texax A&M University, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Salvesen N, Tuck E O, Faltinsen O M. Ship motions and sea loads [J]. Transcations of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1970, 78, 250–287.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Luo Y, Baudic S. Predicting FPSO response using model test and numerical analysis [C]// Proc 13th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Hawaii, USA: ISOPE, 2003: 167–174.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moriskita H M, Junior J R D S. Dynamic behavior of a DICAS FPSO and shuttle vessel under the action of wind, current and waves [C]// Proc 12nd International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Kitakyushu, Japan: ISOPE, 2002: 142–150.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garrett D L. Dynamic analysis of slender rods [J]. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 1982, 104(4), 302–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Riarald O, Elizabeth P. Riflex theory manual [R]. Tronheim, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kannah T R, Natarajan R. Effect of turret location on the dynamic behaviour of an internal turret moored FPSO system [J]. Journal of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, 2006, 3(1): 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-min Yang  (杨健民).

Additional information

Foundation item: the China National Significant Science & Technology Research Program (No. 2008ZX05026-006)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Wh., Yang, Jm., Hu, Zq. et al. Numerical investigation on the hydrodynamic difference between internal and external turret-moored FLNG. J. Shanghai Jiaotong Univ. (Sci.) 18, 590–597 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1202-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12204-011-1202-8

Key words

CLC number

Navigation