Skip to main content
Log in

Deposit-lending synergies and bank profitability

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Banks accept deposits and often lend via commitments. It has been shown that there are synergies between transaction deposits and loan commitments; and that the volatility of bank stock returns declines when these two liquidity risks are taken together. We examine whether such deposit-lending synergies reflect on U.S. commercial bank profitability levels, and whether the synergies impact bank profitability levels differently around financial crises. Our results from panel regressions show that the deposit-lending synergies translate to increased profitability only for small publicly traded banks. However, pre-crisis deposit-lending synergies do not appear to lead to higher profitability during or after the crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Off-balance sheet activities: https://www.fdic.gov/regulations/safety/manual/section3-8.pdf

  2. Call reports are available at https://www.chicagofed.org/banking/financial-institution-rBeginning Maeports/commercial-bank-data

  3. Beginning on March 31, 2011, the banks’ call reports are available from the FFIEC Central Data Repository’s Public Data Distribution at https://cdr.ffiec.gov/public/

  4. Monthly federal funds rates are available on the website of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at http://www.federalreserve.gov

  5. Employment data are from the website of the Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://www.bls.gov

  6. As Holod and Peek (2007) suggest, scaling by assets allows a clearer interpretation of relative responses to changes.

  7. Including or excluding unused credit card commitments lead to similar results in our study.

  8. We reduce to 5 quarters the post-crisis period of the Russian debt /LCTM bailout crisis, as well as the pre-crisis period of the bursting of the dot.com bubble crisis to insure that these periods are not contaminated by crisis proximity.

References

  • Akhigbe A, McNulty J (2005) Profit efficiency sources and differences among small and large U.S. commercial banks. J Econ Finan 29(3):289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avery R, Berger A (1991) Loan commitments and bank risk exposure. J Bank Financ 15:173–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger AN, Bouwman CHS (2008) Financial crises and bank liquidity creation (This is an OLD WP that has been split into 2 parts: (1) How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises (JFE, July 2013); and (2) Bank liquidity creation, monetary policy, and financial crises (WP 2012)). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1231562. Accessed 3 Jan 2016

  • Berger AN, Miller NH, Petersen MA, Rajan RG, Stein JC (2005) Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. J Econ Finan 76(2):237–269

  • Bernanke BS, Lown CS (1991) The credit crunch. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:205–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billett MT, Flannery MJ, Garfinkel JA (1995) The effect of lender identity on a borrowing firm’s equity return. J Financ 50:699–718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boot AWA, Greenbaum SI, Thakor AV (1993) Reputation and discretion in financial contracting. Am Econ Rev 83:1165–1183

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ariccia G, Detragiache E, Rajan RG (2008) The real effects of bank crises. J Financ Intermed 17:89–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond DW, Dybvig PH (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. J Polit Econ 91(3):401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatev E, Strahan PE (2006) Banks’ advantage in hedging liquidity risk: theory and evidence from the commercial paper market. J Financ 61:867–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatev E, Schuermann T, Strahan PE (2009) Managing bank liquidity risk: how deposit-loan synergies vary with market conditions. Rev Fin Stud 22(3):995–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock D, Laing AJ, Wilcox JA (1995) Bank balance sheet shocks and aggregate shocks: their dynamic effects on bank capital and lending. J Bank Financ 19:661–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmström B, Tirole J (1998) Public and private supply of liquidity. J Polit Econ 106(1):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holod D, Peek J (2007) Asymmetric information and liquidity constraints: a new test. J Bank Financ 31:2425–2451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashyap AK, Rajan RG, Stein JC (2002) Banks as liquidity providers: an explanation for the coexistence of lending and deposit-taking. J Financ 57(1):33–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers SC, Rajan RG (1998) The paradox of liquidity. Q Rev Econ Financ 113(3):733–777

    Google Scholar 

  • Peek J, Rosengren ES (1995) The capital crunch: neither a borrower nor a lender be. J Money Credit Bank 27(3):625–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor AV (1996) Capital requirements, monetary policy, and aggregate bank lending: theory and empirical evidence. J Financ 51:279–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika K. Rabarison.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arthur, B.R., Rabarison, M.K. Deposit-lending synergies and bank profitability. J Econ Finan 42, 710–726 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9414-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12197-017-9414-x

Keywords

JEL classification

Navigation