Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Three-Dimensional Matrix Stiffness in Regulating the Response of Human Neural Cells to Toxins

  • Published:
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent studies have highlighted the strong influence of microenvironmental stiffness on various cell fates including proliferation, migration, and differentiation in both two- and three-dimensional culture conditions. Our study attempts to understand the role of 3D microenvironmental stiffness on cell cytotoxic response using neural glioblastoma U-87 cells encapsulated in alginate hydrogel matrices of varying stiffness as the model system. Interestingly, we observed that cells encapsulated in soft alginate matrices were more sensitive to the toxic chemicals relative to cells encapsulated in stiffer matrices. The observed dependence of toxic responses on matrix stiffness was also seen for other neural cell lines including U-251 glioblastoma and IMR-32 neuroblastoma cells. Given the established involvement of Rho GTPases in mediating mechanosensitive cell responses, we also performed the toxicity assays using U-87 cells expressing constitutively active mutants of the Rho GTPase RhoA. Under these conditions, the toxic responses were similar for U-87 cells cultured in both soft and stiff matrices. These results suggest a strong role of mechanotransductive signaling on the response of neural cells to toxins. We believe that determining the role of substrate stiffness on the toxic response of neural cells will be crucial to the development of optimal in vitro cell-based screens of neurotoxicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bal-Price, A. K., H. T. Hogberg, L. Buzanska, and S. Coecke. Relevance of in vitro neurotoxicity testing for regulatory requirements: challenges to be considered. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 32:36–41, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Banerjee, A., M. Arha, S. Choudhary, R. S. Ashton, S. R. Bhatia, D. V. Schaffer, and R. S. Kane. The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 30:4695–4699, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bensamoun, S. F., L. Robert, G. E. Leclerc, L. Debernard, and F. Charleux. Stiffness imaging of the kidney and adjacent abdominal tissues measured simultaneously using magnetic resonance elastography. Clin. Imaging 35:284–287, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, J., J. Irianto, S. Inamdar, P. Pravincumar, D. A. Lee, D. L. Bader, and M. M. Knight. Cell mechanics, structure, and function are regulated by the stiffness of the three-dimensional microenvironment. Biophys. J. 103:1188–1197, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Discher, D. E., P. Janmey, and Y. L. Wang. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310:1139–1143, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elkin, B. S., E. U. Azeloglu, K. D. Costa, and B. Morrison, III. Mechanical heterogeneity of the rat hippocampus measured by atomic force microscope indentation. J. Neurotrauma 24:812–822, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Frampton, J. P., M. R. Hynd, M. L. Shuler, and W. Shain. Fabrication and optimization of alginate hydrogel constructs for use in 3D neural cell culture. Biomed. Mater. 6:015002, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grandjean, P., and P. J. Landrigan. Developmental neurotoxicity of industrial chemicals. Lancet 368:2167–2178, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall, A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science 279:509–514, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Her, G. J., H. C. Wu, M. H. Chen, M. Y. Chen, S. C. Chang, and T. W. Wang. Control of three-dimensional substrate stiffness to manipulate mesenchymal stem cell fate toward neuronal or glial lineages. Acta Biomater. 9:5170–5180, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang, H., R. D. Kamm, and R. T. Lee. Cell mechanics and mechanotransduction: pathways, probes, and physiology. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 287:C1–C11, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Keung, A. J., E. M. de Juan-Pardo, D. V. Schaffer, and S. Kumar. Rho GTPases mediate the mechanosensitive lineage commitment of neural stem cells. Stem Cells 29:1886–1897, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Keung, A. J., K. E. Healy, S. Kumar, and D. V. Schaffer. Biophysics and dynamics of natural and engineered stem cell microenvironments. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 2:49–64, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo, C. K., and P. X. Ma. Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: Part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties. Biomaterials 22:511–521, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lampe, K. J., R. G. Mooney, K. B. Bjugstad, and M. J. Mahoney. Effect of macromer weight percent on neural cell growth in 2D and 3D nondegradable PEG hydrogel culture. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 94:1162–1171, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lan, S. F., and B. Starly. Alginate based 3D hydrogels as an in vitro co-culture model platform for the toxicity screening of new chemical entities. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 256:62–72, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, M. Y., R. A. Kumar, S. M. Sukumaran, M. G. Hogg, D. S. Clark, and J. S. Dordick. Three-dimensional cellular microarray for high-throughput toxicology assays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105:59–63, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lessey, E. C., C. Guilluy, and K. Burridge. From mechanical force to RhoA activation. Biochemistry 51:7420–7432, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lim, S. M., J. P. Trzeciakowski, H. Sreenivasappa, L. J. Dangott, and A. Trache. RhoA-induced cytoskeletal tension controls adaptive cellular remodeling to mechanical signaling. Integr. Biol. (Camb) 4:615–627, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. MacKay, J. L., A. J. Keung, and S. Kumar. A genetic strategy for the dynamic and graded control of cell mechanics, motility, and matrix remodeling. Biophys. J. 102:434–442, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McBeath, R., D. M. Pirone, C. M. Nelson, K. Bhadriraju, and C. S. Chen. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and RhoA regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6:483–495, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Paterson, H. F., A. J. Self, M. D. Garrett, I. Just, K. Aktories, and A. Hall. Microinjection of recombinant p21rho induces rapid changes in cell morphology. J. Cell Biol. 111:1001–1007, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pathak, A., and S. Kumar. Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109:10334–10339, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peyton, S. R., P. D. Kim, C. M. Ghajar, D. Seliktar, and A. J. Putnam. The effects of matrix stiffness and RhoA on the phenotypic plasticity of smooth muscle cells in a 3-d biosynthetic hydrogel system. Biomaterials 29:2597–2607, 2008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, N., J. D. Tytell, and D. E. Ingber. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:75–82, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weiss, B. Lead, manganese, and methylmercury as risk factors for neurobehavioral impairment in advanced age. Int. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011 607543, 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Sanjay Kumar at University of California, Berkeley for the CA RhoA U-87 and DN RhoA U-87 cells and Joanna L. MacKay for help with the culture of the cells. We would like to thank those Bioengineering undergraduate students from the Fall 2012 Tissue Engineering class at Santa Clara University for assistance in data collection. We thank Jose Marcial Portilla for assistance in preparing the figures, Sabrina A. Cismas and Nicolo Philip Mendoza for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions. This research was supported by School of Engineering, Santa Clara University.

Conflicts of interest

Kalpith Ramamoorthi, Jared Hara, CadeEllis Ito, and Prashanth Asuri declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

No human studies were carried out by the authors for this article. No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prashanth Asuri.

Additional information

Associate Editor Michael R. King oversaw the review of this article.

Jared Hara and CadeEllis Ito: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 35 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramamoorthi, K., Hara, J., Ito, C. et al. Role of Three-Dimensional Matrix Stiffness in Regulating the Response of Human Neural Cells to Toxins. Cel. Mol. Bioeng. 7, 278–284 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-014-0326-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12195-014-0326-y

Keywords

Navigation