Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Photon dose rate distribution inside and outside a brachytherapy room

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a brachytherapy room irradiated with an Iridium-192 (192Ir) source, the spatial distributions of photon dose rates were measured and calculated for the dose distribution both inside and outside the room. The spatial distributions were measured using a thermoluminescent dosimeter (LiF-100) on the surfaces of the concrete walls and barriers of the irradiation room. The calculations were performed using the particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) by considering the detailed model of the brachytherapy room and the radiation source used in the measurements. The measured and calculated doses exhibited a similar distribution pattern within and outside the brachytherapy room. To reduce the edge effect at the entrance door, the addition of a 3-mm thick lead layer on the surface of the concrete wall on the left doorstop is recommended. For the 60Co source, with the existing walls and lead door thickness, the dose at the control console and in front of the entrance maze increased by a factor of approximately 60.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Source geometry is centered at x = 500 cm and z = 200 cm. b Sliding lead door (denoted as 103) outside of the room. The lead thickness is 6 mm

Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Olukotun SF, Gbenu ST, Oladejo OF, Sayyed MI, Tajudin SM, Amosun AA, Fasasi MK. Investigation of gamma ray shielding capability of fabricated clay-polyethylene composites using EGS5, XCOM and Phy-X/PSD Radiat. Phys Chem. 2020;7: 109079.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aziz MA, Yani S, Haryanto F, Ali NK, Tajudin SM, Iwase H, Musarudin M, et al. Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray room shielding in diagnostic radiology using PHITS code. J Radiat Res Appl Sci. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/16878507.2020.1828020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sabri AA, Aziz MA, Olukotun SF, Tabbakh F, Tajudin SM. Study on the shielding materials for low-energy gamma sources. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;785:012007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kun Y, Wenyun L, Xiaoqing D, Chuanshan W, Guohua W, Mawei J, Yuanzi Z. A new lead free radiation shielding material for radiotherapy Radiat. Prot Dosim. 2009;133:256–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabri AH, Abdul Aziz MZ, Olukotun SF, Tajudin SM. Calculation of attenuation parameter for Ir-192 gamma source in shielding materials. J Med Phys. 2022;47:34–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Radiation Protection in Brachytherapy. 2019; Accessed Jun 11. https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/radiotherapy/brachytherapy.

  7. Nurhakimah Mamat et al. A comparative photon shielding properties of protective window materials by using EGS5 code. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2022; 1321: 0122006.

  8. Kainz K. Radiation oncology physics: a handbook for teachers and students. Med Phys. 2006;33:1920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tajudin SM, Sabri AHA, Abdul Aziz MZ, Olukotun SF, Ojo BM, Fasasi MK. Feasibility of clay-shielding material for low-energy photons (Gamma/X)." Nuclear Eng Technol (2019).

  10. Osman NM, et al. Evaluation of scattering effects for radiation shielding or filter materials by using Monte Carlo simulation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2022;1231(1):012007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor M, Kron T. Consideration of the radiation dose delivered away from the treatment field to patients in radiotherapy. J Med Phys. 2011;36(2):59–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Tajudin SM, Sabri AHA. SIMU-RAD programme: a learning tool for radiation (photons and charged particles) interaction. Polish J Med Phys Eng. 2019;25(3):189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tajudin SM, Namito Y, Sanami T. Hirayama H Quasi-monoenergetic 200 keV photon field using a radioactive source with backscatter layout. Japanese J Appl Phys. 2014. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.53.116401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tajudin SM, Aminordin Sabri AH, Abdul Aziz MZ, Tabbakh F. Gadolinium-doped polymeric as a shielding material for X-ray,". IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2021;1106(1):012010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tajudin SM, Tabbakh F. Biological polymeric shielding design for an X-ray laboratory using Monte Carlo codes. Radiol Phys Technol. 2019;12(3):299–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tajudin SM, Namito Y, Sanami T, Hirayama H. Experimental study of quasi-monoenergetic 200 keV photon field using a radioactive source with backscatter layout. IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 2013; Article no. 6829658.

  17. Tajudin SM, Namito Y, Sanami T, Hirayama H. Photon field of ~100–200 keV for Environmental Dosemeter Calibration. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Radioisotope pocket data book, 11th edition, Japan Radioisotope Association (JRIA).

  19. Katoh A. A brief introduction of ICRU 47: measurement of dose equivalents from external photon and electron radiations. Japanese J Health Phys. 1993;28:219–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa T, Furuta T, Abe S, Kai T, Tsai PE, Matsuda N, Iwase H, Shigyo N, Sihver L, Niita K. Features of Particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) version. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1419890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/html/xcom1.html.

  22. Granero D, Vijande J, Ballester F, Rivard M. Dosimetry revisited for the HDR 192Ir brachytherapy source model mHDR-v2. Med Phys. 2011;38:487–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin Research Grant (Dana Penyelidikan Universiti) [UniSZA/2020/DPU2.0/07]. The authors would also like to extend their gratitude to the PHITS development team of the Japanese Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) and the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (Kō Enerugī Kasokuki Kenkyū Kikō, KEK) for providing us with wonderful Monte Carlo simulation PHITS code. Appreciation also goes to the staff of the radiotherapy unit in the Advanced Medical and Dental Institute (AMDI), Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for their in-depth guidance on measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suffian Mohamad Tajudin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

This article does not include any studies performed on human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aminordin Sabri, A.H., Mohamad Tajudin, S., Abdul Aziz, M.Z. et al. Photon dose rate distribution inside and outside a brachytherapy room. Radiol Phys Technol 16, 109–117 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00703-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-023-00703-8

Keywords

Navigation