Abstract
The methodological challenges in the research on children’s subjective understandings of well-being are very close to the ones surrounding the implementation of the right of the child to be heard. Therefore, identification of the factors favouring or impeding children’s freely expressed views on the one hand, and preliminary results of research on children’s subjective well-being on the other hand, reciprocally inform each other. The right to be heard is approached from the perspective of capabilities (Stoecklin & Bonvin 2014) identifying factors that are converting this formal freedom into real freedom. They highlight preliminary results of a qualitative study conducted in Switzerland along the procotol of the Child’s Subjective Well-Being study (Hunner-Kreisel et al. 2016). The inclusion of a participative research tool, the “actor’s system” (Stoecklin 2013), has allowed to concentrate on children’s subjective understandings of their experience. The results are not analysed in terms of statistical representativeness, but rather in terms of « structural » features they allow to highlight. The endeavour is methodological. The analysis shows that language itself can be a conversion factor in the implementation of the right to be heard, and similarly a methodological trap inducing specific translations of children’s voices into the official “vocabulary” of well-being. Research protocols should therefore be adapted to the evolving capacities of children, considering that well-being is not given state but rather a subjective feeling stemming from processual social dynamics in which children play a part, even when they have little voice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx. Consulted, 23.02.2017.
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/crc/docs/AdvanceVersions/CRC-C-GC-12.pdf. Consulted, 23.02.2017.
Preamble of the UNCRC. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx. Consulted, 23.02.2017.
References
Andresen, S. (2014). Childhood vulnerability: systematic, structural, and individual dimensions. Child Indicators Research, 7, 699–713.
Aptekar, L., Stoecklin, D. (2014). Street children and homeless youth: a cross-cultural perspective. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3–16.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2014). Social policy and the changing concept of child well-being: The role of international studies and children as active participants. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 60. Jg., Heft 4. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz Juventa, S. 569–581.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewoods Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Bonvin, J.-M., Stoecklin, D. (2016). Children's rights as evolving capabilities: towards a contextualized and processual conception of social justice. In: G. Graf, G. Schweiger, M. Cabezas (Eds). Ethical Perspectives 21, no 1: 19-39.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New-York: Greenwood.
COE (2011). Child and youth participation in Finland. A council of Europe policy review. Council of Europe. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/children/publications/ParticipationFinland_en.asp.
de Houwer, A. (2017). Minority language parenting in Europe and children’s well-being. In N. Cabrera & B. Leyendecker (Eds.), Handbook on positive development of minority children and youth (pp. 231–246). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C Heath & Co Publishers.
Dewey, J. (1938). Logic. The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
Elias, N. (1991). The society of individuals. London and New York: Continuum.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hanson, K., & Vandaele, A. (2003). Working children and international labour law: a critical analysis. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 11, 73–146.
Hart, R. (1992). Children’s participation from tokenism to citizenship. Florence: Innocenti Research Center.
Hunner-Kreisel, C., Fegter, S. & Fattore, T. (2016). Child well-being and cultural contingency: a study of global child wellbeing. ISA Sociology of Childhood Newsletter (November 2015).
James, A., & Prout, A. (1990). Constructing and reconstructing childhood: Contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood. Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
Ogien, A., & Quéré, L. (2005). Le vocabulaire de la sociologie de l’action. Paris: Ellipses.
Percy-Smith, B., & Thomas, N. (2010). A handbook of children and young people’s participation. Perspectives from theory and practice. London and New-York: Routledge.
Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W., & Honig, M. (Eds.). (2009). The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. London: Palgrave McMillan.
Rees, G., Andresen, S. & Bradshaw, J. (Eds.) (2016). Children’s views on their lives and well-being in 16 countries: A report on the Children’s Worlds survey of children aged eight years old, 2013–15. York: Children’s Worlds Project (ISCWeB, www.isciweb.org).
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shils, E. A., Finch, H. A. (1997). The methodology of the social sciences (1903-17). New York: Free Press.
Spini, D., Hanappi, D., Bernardi, L., Bickel, J.-F., & Oris, M. (2013). Vulnerability across the life course: a theoretical framework and research directions. LIVES Working Papers, 27.
Stoecklin, D. (2009). Réflexivité, participation et capabilité. In: J. Zermatten & D. Stoecklin (Eds). Ledroit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique: contribution à un nouveau contrat social (pp. 47–71). Sion: IUKB/IDE.
Stoecklin, D. (2013). Theories of action in the field of child participation. In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood. 20(4), 443–457.
Stoecklin, D. (2018). Institutionalisation of children’s rights: Transformability and situated agency. The International Journal of Children’s Rights, 26(2) (in press).
Stoecklin, D., Bonvin, J.-M. (2014). Children's rights and the capability approach. Challenges and prospects. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.
Thomas, W. I. (1967). The unajusted girl. With cases and standpoint for behavioral analysis. New-York, Evanston, and London: Harper & Row.
Thomas, W. I., & Thomas, D. S. (1928). The child in America: Behavior problems and programs. New York: Knopf.
UNCRC (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Accessed 18 Apr 2016.
Zermatten, J. (2009). Le droit de l’enfant d’exprimer son opinion et d’être entendu (art. 12). In: J. Zermatten & D. Stoecklin (Eds.) Le droit des enfants de participer. Norme juridique et réalité pratique: contribution à un nouveau contrat social (pp. 13–44). Sion: IUKB/IDE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoecklin, D. Freely Expressed Views: Methodological Challenges for the Right of the Child to be Heard. Child Ind Res 12, 569–588 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9527-6