Abstract
Most studies on parenting and adolescent development address the effect of parenting on adolescent outcomes. Little research has examined how adolescent outcomes may influence parenting. Drawing on longitudinal data over a two-year period (ninth to tenth grade), this study examines the reciprocal relations between parenting and adolescent outcomes—specifically, between parental psychological control and adolescent academic adjustment. The participants were 339 academically gifted high school students from Chinese American and European American families. Our findings suggest that the reciprocal relationship between psychological control and academic adjustment is similar for academically gifted Chinese and European American students. Regarding the child’s effect, low levels of earlier academic efficacy predicted later psychological control for both groups. Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find parental effects for either group, suggesting that psychological control does not bring about negative academic adjustment outcomes for either ethnicity. Implications and directions for future research are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adelson, J. L. (2007). A “perfect” case study: perfectionism in academically talented fourth graders. Gifted Child Today, 30(4), 14–20.
Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2004). Maternal affection moderates the impact of psychological control on a child’s mathematical performance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 965–978.
Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67(6), 3296–3319.
Bauer, D. J. (2005). The role of nonlinear factor-to-indicator relationships in tests of measurement equivalence. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 305–316.
Chao, R. K. (2001). Extending research on the consequences of parenting style for Chinese Americans and European Americans. Child Development, 72(6), 1832–1843.
Chen, F. F., Sousa, K. H., & West, S. G. (2005). Testing measurement invariance of second-order factor models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(3), 471–492.
Chua, A. (2011). Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother. New York: Penguin Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
d’Ailly, H. (2003). Children’s autonomy and perceived control in learning: a model of motivation and achievement in Taiwan. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 84–96.
Feld, L. D., & Shusterman, A. (2015). Into the pressure cooker: Student stress in college preparatory high schools. Journal of Adolescence, 41, 31–42.
Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., & Jahng, S. (2010). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: the role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 649–661.
Harter, S. (1985). The Self-perception Profile for Adolescents. Unpublished manuscript. Denver: Department of Psychology, University of Denver.
Huck, S. (2004). Reading Statistics and Research (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kim, S. Y., Wang, Y., Orozco-Lapray, D., Shen, Y., & Murtuza, M. (2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7–18.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
Krane, S. (2001). New York City Specialized Science High Schools Admission Test. ARCO.
Mackinnon, D. P., Fairchild, A. J., & Fritz, M. S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593–614.
McClain, M. C., & Pfeiffer, S. (2012). Identification of gifted students in the United States today: a look at state definitions, policies, and practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28(1), 59–88.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2003). Factors that differentiate underachieving gifted students from high-achieving gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 144–154.
McLeod, J. D., Uemura, R., & Rohrman, S. (2012). Adolescent mental health, behavior problems, and academic achievement. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 53(4), 482–497.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (1998–2012). Mplus: Statistical Analyses with Latent Variables. User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Muthén, L., & Muthén, B. (2005). Chi-square Difference Testing Using the S-B Scaled Chi-square (Note on Mplus website). Retrieved from www.statmodel.com/chidiff.shtml.
Ng, F. F.-Y., Pomerantz, E. M., & Deng, C. (2014). Why are Chinese mothers more controlling than American mothers? “my child is my report card”. Child Development, 85(1), 355–369.
Padilla, A. M. (2004). Quantitative methods in multicultural education research. In J. Banks & C. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (2nd ed., pp. 127–145). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Pastorelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Rola, J., Rozsa, S., & Bandura, A. (2001). The structure of children’s perceived self-efficacy: a cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 87–97.
Peterson, J., Duncan, N., & Canady, K. (2009). A longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 53(1), 34–49.
Phillipson, S. (2013). Parental expectations. In S. Phillipson, K. Y. L. Ku, & S. N. Phillipson (Eds.), Constructing Educational Achievement: A Sociocultural Perspective (pp. 87–104). Abingdon: Routledge.
Pomerantz, E. M., & Eaton, M. M. (2001). Maternal intrusive support in the academic context: transactional socialization processes. Developmental Psychology, 37(2), 174–186.
Qin, D. B. (2006). “Our child doesn’t talk to us anymore”: alienation in immigrant Chinese families. Anthropology Education Quarterly, 37, 162–179.
Qin, D. B. (2008). Doing well vs. feeling well: understanding family dynamics and the psychological adjustment of Chinese immigrant adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(1), 22–35.
Qin, D. B., Way, N., & Mukherjee, P. (2008). The other side of the model minority story: the familial and peer challenges faced by Chinese American adolescents. Youth & Society, 39, 480–506.
Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: what do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(3), 152–170.
Rhtkonen, K. (2005). Parents’ causal attributions concerning children’s school achievement: a longitudinal study. Merril-Larmer Quarterly, 51(4), 494–522.
Rothbaum, F., & Trommsdorff, G. (2007). Do roots and wings complement or oppose one another: The socialization of relatedness and autonomy in cultural context. In J. Grusec & P. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of Socialization (2nd ed., pp. 461–489). New York: Guilford Press.
Russell, S. T., Crockett, L. J., & Chao, R. K. (2010). Asian American Parenting and Parent–adolescent Relationships. New York: Springer.
Sameroff, A. (2009). The transactional model. In A. Sameroff (Ed.), The Transactional Model of Development (pp. 3–22). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
Sher-Censor, E., Parke, R. D., & Coltrane, S. (2011). Parents’ promotion of psychological autonomy, psychological control, and Mexican-American adolescents’ adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 620–632.
Silk, J. S., Morris, A. S., Kanaya, T., & Steinberg, L. (2003). Psychological control and autonomy granting: opposite ends of a continuum or distinct constructs? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 113–128.
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74–99.
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of parenting practices on adolescent achievement: authoritative parenting, school involvement, and encouragement to succeed. Child Development, 63, 1266–1281.
Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents’ control in early adolescents’ psychological functioning: a longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592–1610.
Wang, Q., Chan, H. W., & Lin, L. (2012). Antecedents of Chinese parents’ autonomy support and psychological control: the interplay between parents’ self-development socialization goals and adolescents’ school performance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(11), 1442–1454.
Widaman, K. F., Ferrer, E., & Conger, R. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18.
Worrell, F. C. (2002). Global and domain-specific self-concepts in academically talented Asian American and White adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(2), 90–97.
Wu, C., & Chao, R. K. (2011). Intergenerational cultural dissonance in parent–adolescent relationships among Chinese and European Americans. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 493–508.
Yamamoto, Y., & Holloway, S. D. (2010). Parental expectations and children’s academic performance in sociocultural context. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 189–214.
Yang, Y., & Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: a reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 377–392.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 202–231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, TF., Qin, D.B. Relations Between Academic Adjustment and Parental Psychological Control of Academically Gifted Chinese American and European American Students. Child Ind Res 10, 715–734 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9403-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-016-9403-1