Skip to main content
Log in

Intêret du FibroScan® et des marqueurs biologiques de la fibrose hépatique, chez des sénégalais porteurs chroniques du virus de l’hépatite B faiblement réplicatifs

Interest FibroScan® and biochemical markers of liver fibrosis in Senegalese chronic hepatitis B patients with low-replicative viral

  • Article / Article
  • Published:
Journal Africain d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie

Résumé

Contexte et objectifs

L’infection par le virus de l’hépatite B (VHB) est la cause la plus fréquente d’hépatopathies aigue et chronique dans le monde. Les patients avec une charge virale faible et des transaminases normales ont un moindre risque d’évolution vers la fibrose. Nous avons déterminé la proportion de patients porteurs chroniques du VHB sans cytolyse à faible réplication virale, ne répondant pas aux critères de traitement antiviral fondés sur les recommandations occidentales nécessitant néanmoins un traitement sur la base d’une fibrose significative au FibroScan®.

Patients et méthodes

Il s’agit d’une étude prospective transversale entre mars 2013 et novembre 2014 dans 3 hôpitaux de la région de Thiès. Etait inclus tout patient VHB+ ≥ 18 ans, avec des transaminases normales (<40UI/L), faiblement réplicateurs (charge virale < 20 000UI/ml), asymptomatique, mono infecté par VBH. Les patients porteurs du VIH ou du VHC ou ayant reçu un quelconque traitement antiviral étaient exclus. Le FibroScan® était réalisé chez tous les patients. Les scores APRI et FIB-4 étaient calculés.

Résultats

Au total 395 patients ont été évalués, dont 94 répondaient aux critères d’inclusion (53% sexe masculin). La valeur moyenne du Fibroscan® était de 5.64±1.72 kPa avec 17 patients (18.08%) qui avait une fibrose >7kPa. Pour éliminer une fibrose significative (FS <7kPa), les scores APRI et FIB-4 avaient des performances comparables avec respectivement (sensibilité 11.1%, spécificité 96.05%, VPP 40% et VPN 82%) et (sensibilité 11.11%, spécificité 90.79%, VPP 22.22 % et VPN 81.18 %).

Conclusion

Une bonne partie des patients infectés par le VHB avec des ALAT normales et une faible charge virale ont une maladie hépatique active. Les deux scores biologiques FIB-4 et APRI sont utiles pour identifier les personnes sans fibrose significative avec une bonne VPN >81%.

Abstract

Background and objectives

Infection with Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) is the most common cause of acute and chronic liver desease all over the world. Patients with low viral load and normal transaminases have a lesser risk of progression to fibrosis.We evaluated the proportion of chronic HBV patients without cytolysis with a low viral replication, not responding to antiviral treatment criteria founded on international recommendations; but requiring treatment based of significant fibrosis at FibroScan®.

Patients and methods

This is a prospective cross-sectional study between March 2013 and November 2014 in three hospitals in the region of Thies. Chronic hepatitis B patients who were at least 18 years of age, with HBV DNA levels below 20 000 IU/ml, normal liver enzymes (alanine transaminase < 40 U/l), mono infected by HBV were included. Patients with HIV or HCV or HBV antiviral treatment were excluded. Fibroscan® was performed in all patients. The APRI and FIB-4 scores were calculated.

Results

In total 395 patients were evaluated: 94met the inclusion criteria (53% male). The mean value Fibroscan® was 5.64 ± 1.72 kPa with 17 patients (18.08%) who had fibrosis > 7kPa. To exclude a significant fibrosis (FS <7kPa), the APRI and FIB-4 scores had similar performance (sensitivity 11.1%, specificity 96.05%, PPV 40% and NPV 82%) and (sensitivity 11.11%, specificity 90.79%, PPV 22.22% and NPV 81.18%) respectively.

Conclusion

Many patients infected with HBV with normal ALT and low viral load have active liver disease. Both biological scores FIB-4 and APRI are useful for distinguishing patients without significant fibrosis with a good negative predictive value> 81%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Ott JJ, Stevens GA, Groeger J, et al (2012). Global epidemiology of hepatitis B virus infection: new estimates of age-specific HBsAg seroprevalence and endemicity. Vaccine 30: 2212–19

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sombié R, Bougouma A, Diallo O, et al (2010). Hépatite B chronique: aspects épidémiologique, diagnostique, thérapeutique et évolutif au centre hospitalier universitaire Yalgado Ouédraogo de Ouagadougou. J Afr Hépatol Gastroentérol 4: 3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lemoine M, Eholié S, Lacombe K (2015). Reducing the neglected burden of viral hepatitis in Africa: Strategies for a global approach. J Hepatol 62: 469–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mbaye PS, Sarr A, Sire JM, et al (2011). Liver stiffness measurement and biochemical markers in Senegalese chronic hepatitis B patients with normal ALT and high viral load. PLoS One 6(7): e22291

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedossa P, Carrat F (2009). Liver biopsy: the best, not the gold standard. J Hepatol 50 (1): 1–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, et al (2003). A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 38: 518–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, et al (2006). Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV co-infection. Hepatology 43: 1317–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiao G, Yang J, Yan L (2015). Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index and fibrosis-4 index for detecting liver fibrosis in adult patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: a systemic review and metaanalysis. Hepatology 61(1): 292–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcellin P, Ziol M, Bedossa P, et al (2009). Non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis by stiffness measurement in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Liver Int 29: 242–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lok AS, McMahon BJ (2009). Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology 50: 661–2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Y, Chen Y, Zhao Y (2014). The diagnostic value of the FIB-4 index for staging hepatitis B-related fibrosis: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 9 (8): e105728

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Assal A, Mackie D, Cooper CL (2014). Transient elastography, APRI, and ultrasound have minimal utility in chronic lowreplicative hepatitis B infection. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 26: 1010–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Association For The Study Of The Liver (2012). EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol 57: 167–85

  14. Wang H, Xue L, Yan R, et al (2013). Comparison of FIB-4 and APRI in Chinese HBV-infected patients with persistently normal ALT and mildly elevated ALT. J Viral Hepat. 20(4): 3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar M, Sarin SK, Hissar S, et al (2008). Virologic and histologic features of chronic hepatitis B virus-infected asymptomatic patients with persistently normal ALT. Gastroenterology 134: 1376–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai M, Hyatt BJ, Nasser I, et al (2007). The clinical significance of persistently normal ALT in chronic hepatitis B infection. J Hepatol 47: 760–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S (2001). Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 344: 495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cadranel JF, Nousbaum JB(2012). Indications de la ponction biopsie hépatique au cours des maladies parenchymateuses diffuses du foie. Presse Med 41(11):1064–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seo YS, Kim MY, Kim SU, et al (2015). Accuracy of transient elastography in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis: A multicentre, retrospective study. Liver Int 14: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  20. Juárez-Hernández E, Uribe-Ramos MH, Ramos-Ostos MH, et al (2015). Factors associated with the quality of transient elastography. Dig Dis Sci 60(7): 2177–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coco B, Oliveri F, Maina AM, et al (2007). Transient elastography: a new surrogate marker of liver fibrosis influenced by major changes of transaminases. J Viral Hepat 14:360–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou K, Gao CF, Zhao YP, et al (2010). Simpler score of routine laboratory tests predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 25: 1569–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Forns X, Ampuedanes S, Liovet JM, et al (2002). Indentification of chronic hepatitis c patients without hepatic fibrosis by a simple predictive model. Hepatology 36: 986–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bonnard P, Sombié R, Lescure FX, et al (2010). Comparison of elastography, serum marker scores, and histology for the assessment of liver fibrosis in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients in Burkina Faso. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 82(3): 454–8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lacobellis A, Mangia A, Leandro G, et al (2005). External validation of biochemical indices for non invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 868–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kawamoto M, Mizuguchi T, Katsuramari T, et al (2006). Assessment of liver fibrosis by a non-invasive method of transient elastography and biochemical markers. World J Gastroenterol 12: 4325–30

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu XY, Kong H, Song RX, et al (2014). The effectiveness of noninvasive biomarkers to predict hepatitis B-related significant fibrosis and cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy. PLoS One 9(6): e100182

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sebstiani G, Castera L, Halfon P, et al (2011). The impact of liver disease aetiology and the stages of hepatic fibrosis on the performance of non-invasive fibrosis biomarkers: an international study of 2411 cases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:1202–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. S. Touré.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Touré, P.S., Diop, M.M., Lô, G. et al. Intêret du FibroScan® et des marqueurs biologiques de la fibrose hépatique, chez des sénégalais porteurs chroniques du virus de l’hépatite B faiblement réplicatifs. J Afr Hepato Gastroenterol 10, 14–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12157-015-0634-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12157-015-0634-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation