Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The different voices of helping: Gender differences in recounting dilemmas

  • Articles
  • Published:
Gender Issues Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carol Gilligan (1977, 1982) has proposed fundamental gender differences. Women typically conceptualize interpersonal dilemmas in terms of people and their relationships, whereas men often orient to dilemmas as practical problems. Although considerable research has explored these gender differences, they have usually been treated as psychological traits or abstract moral orientations. In this article we show how Gilligan’s theory accounts for gender differences when interviewees described their efforts to prevent others from driving under the influence (DUI intervention). This result extends Gilligan's theory by showing how it can account for real life differences between men and women. By demonstrating the relevance of Gilligan's gender differences to everyday life, we lay a foundation for further sociological exploration of her ideas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auerbach, J., L. Blum, V. Smith, and C. Williams. (1985). “Commentary on Gilligan's In a Different Voice,” Feminist Studies 11:149–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, J.M. (1983). “Women's Rationality and Men's Virtues: A Critique of Gender Dualism in Gilligan's Theory of Moral Development,” Social Research 3:597–642.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R. and G. Kirkup. (1990). “Women in Professional Engineering: The Interaction of Gendered Structures and Values,” Feminist Review 35:92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, J. (1987). “Eco-Feminism and Deep Ecology,” Environmental Ethics 9:115–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. and J. Frey. (1992). “Drunk Driving and Informal Social Control: The Case of Peer Intervention,” Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal 13:73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlem, M. (1991). “Surrogate Motherhood and the Morality of Care,” Women and Criminal Justice 3:101–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, K. (1989). “Criminal Justice Ideologies and Practices in Different Voices: Some Feminist Questions About Justice,” International Journal of the Sociology of Law 17:1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1992). “Toward a Feminist Rhetoric: The Gilligan Debate Revisited,” Women's Studies International Forum 15:219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L.V. (1985). “Female and Male Voices in Social Work,” Social Work 30:106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donenberg, G.R. and L.W. Hoffman. (1988). “Gender Differences in Moral Development,” Sex Roles 18:701–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, P.M. (1983). “Interaction: The Work Women Do,” in B. Thorne, C. Kramarae, and N. Henley (eds.) Language, Gender, and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, O.J. and J.E. Adler. (1983). “Impartiality and Particularity,” Social Research 50: 576–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, M.R. and C.R. Lowery. (1986). “Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning: A Comparison of the Use of Justice and Care Orientations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50:777–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, W.J., A.B. Robinson, and B.L. Friedman. (1987). “Sex Differences in Moral Judgements? A Test of Gilligan's Theory.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 11:37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K.M. (1989). “Gender Differences in Self-Reported Moral Reasoning: A Review and New Evidence,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 18:475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). “In A Different Voice: Women's Conceptions of Self and Morality,” Harvard Educational Review 47:481–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. and J. Attanucci. (1988). “Two Moral Orientations,” in C. Gilligan, J.V. Ward, and J.M. Taylor, with B. Bardige (eds.) Mapping the Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women's Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, C.G. and E.E. Maccoby (1986). “On In a Different Voice: An Interdisciplinary Forum. How Different Is the ‘Different Voice’?” Signs 11:310–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gusfield, J., J. Kotarba, and P. Rasmussen. (1981). “The Public Society of Intimates: Friends, Wives, Lovers and Others in the Drinking-Driving Drama,” Research in the Interweave of Social Roles: Friendship 2:237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, N.K. (1986). “Anger in Different Voices: Carol Gilligan and The Mill on the Floss,” Signs 12:23–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, A.C.R., M.D. Newcomb, J. Rabow, and N.H. Wolfinger. (1993). “Emotions and Helping Behavior,” paper presented at Annual Meeting, Western Psychological Association, Phoenix.

  • Hostelling, K. and L. Forrest. (1985). “Gilligan's Theory of Sex-Role Development: A Perspective for Counseling,” Journal of Counseling and Development 64:183–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, S.C. (1988). “The Ghost in the Machine: Artificial Intelligence and Gendered Thought Patterns,” Resources for Feminist Research 17:4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M.M. (1983). Review of Gilligan, Contemporary Sociology 12:448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D.K. (1985). Two Moral Orientations—Two Problem-Solving Strategies: Adolescents' Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables. Ed.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, D.K. (1988). “Adolescents' Solutions to Dilemmas in Fables: Two Moral Orientations—Two Problem Solving Strategies,” in C. Gilligan, J.V. Ward, and J.M. Taylor, with B. Bardige (eds) Mapping The Moral Domain: A Contribution of Women's Thinking to Psychological Theory and Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (1983). “A Theory of Qualitative Methodology: The Social System of Analytic Fieldwork,” In R.M. Emerson (ed) Contemporary Field Research. Illinois: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerber, L.K. (1986). “On In a Different Voice: An Interdisciplinary Forum. Some Cautionary Words for Historians,” Signs 11:304–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdale, S. (1983). Moral Orientations and Moral Development: The Analysis of Care and Justice Reasoning Across Different Dilemmas in Females and Males from Childhood through Adulthood. Ed.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luria, Z. (1986). “On In a Different Voice: An Interdisciplinary Forum. A Methodological Critique,” Signs 11:316–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1982). Conceptions of Self and Morality and Modes of Moral Choice: Identifying Justice and Care in Judgements of Actual Moral Dilemmas. Ed.D. diss., Harvard University, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N. (1983). “Two Perspectives: On Self, Relationships, and Morality,” Harvard Educational Review 53:125–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennuti, R.B. and D.G. Creamer. (1991). “Role of Orientation, Gender, and Dilemma Content in Moral Reasoning,” Journal of College Student Development 32:241–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nails, D. (1983). “Social-Scientific Sexism: Gilligan's Mismeasure of Man,” Social Research 50:643–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, M.D., J. Rabow, M. Monto, and A.C.R. Hernandez. (1992). “Informal Drunk Driving Intervention: Psychosocial Correlates Among Young Adult Women and Men,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24:1988–2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, L.J. (1983). “Women, Morality, and History,” Social Research 50:514–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E. (1992). “Indexing Gender”. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking Context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.W., G. Golding, and W.J. Hunter. (1984). “Does Morality Have a Gender?” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 30:321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M.W., G. Golding, W. Hunter, and R. Sampson. (1988). “Sex Differences in Adult Moral Orientations,” Journal of Personality 56:373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. W., M. Pancer, B. Hunsberger, and J. Manchester. (1990). “Reasoning about the Self and Relationships in Maturity: An Integrative Complexity Analysis of Individual Differences.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:575–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabow, J. and M.D. Newcomb. (1992). “Informal Drunk Driving Intervention as Helping Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice” Sociological Practice Review 3:94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabow, J., M.D. Newcomb, M.A. Monto, and A.C.R. Hernandez. (1990). “Altruism in Drunk Driving Situations: Personal and Situational Factors in Intervention,” Social Psychology Quarterly 53:199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, M.L. (1985). “Gilligan's Theory of Moral Development as Applied to Social Work,” Social Work 30:101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbart, M.K., D. Hanley, and M. Albert. (1986). “Gender Differences in Moral Reasoning,” Sex Roles 15:645–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. (1990). “Pickle Fights: Gendered Talk in Preschool Disputes” Discourse Processes 13:5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack, C. B. (1986). “On In a different voice: An interdisciplinary forum. The culture of gender: Women and men of color,” Signs 11:321–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, L. (1989). “Different Voice/Different Voices: Anglican Women in Ministry,” Review of Religious Research 30:262–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiller, N.J. and L. Forrest. (1990). “An Extension of Gilligan and Lyons's Investigation of Morality: Gender Differences in College Students,” Journal of College Student Development 31:54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. (1990). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannen, D. 1993. “The Relativity of Linguistic Strategies: Rethinking Power and Solidarity in Gender and Dominance.” In R. Tannen (ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoma, S.J. (1986). “Estimating Gender Differences in the Comprehension and Preference of Moral Issues,” Developmental Review 6:165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J.C. (1987). “Beyond Gender Difference to a Theory of Care,” Signs 12:644–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turrisi, R., J. Jaccard, S.Q. Kelly, and C.M. O'Malley. (1993). “Social Psychological Factors Involved in Adolescents' Efforts to Prevent Their Friends from Driving While Intoxicated,” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 22:147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J.C. (1983). “In a Diffident Voice: Cryptoseparatist Analysis of Female Moral Development,” Social Research 50:665–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.J. (1984). “Sex Differences in the Development of Moral Reasoning: A Critical Review,” Child Development 55:677–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.J. (1989). “A Longitudinal Study of Moral Reasoning,” Child Development 60:157–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L.J., B. de Vries, and S.D. Trevethan. (1987). “Moral Stages and Moral Orientations in Real-Life and Hypothetical Dilemmas,” Child Development 58:842–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, J.D. and D.E. Bursor. (1984). “Gilligan and Kohlberg: Gender Issues in Moral Development,” Journal of Humanistic Education and Development 22:134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfinger, N.H., J. Rabow, and M.D. Newcomb. (1994). “Reexamining Personal and Situational Factors in Drunk Driving Interventions,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 24:1627–1639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacker, N. and S.L. Weinberg. (1990). “Care and Justice Orientation: A Scale for Its Assessment,” Journal of Personality Assessment 55:18–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas H. Wolfinger.

Additional information

His interests include divorce, social demography, and research methods. His book on the intergenerational transmission of divorce will be published by Stanford University Press.

Jerome Rabow has been a professor of sociology at the University of California-Los Angeles since 1965. He has published more than 100 articles in the areas of drunk driving intervention, gender and money, education, and race relations. He recently completed Tutoring Matters: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About How to Tutor (Temple University Press, 1999), a book based on the tutoring experiences of his UCLA students. Professor Rabow is also a psychotherapist in private practice in Los Angeles.

He is also Research Psychologist and co-director of the Substance Abuse Research Center in the Psychology Department at the University of California, Los Angeles. Professor Newcomb has published over 200 papers and chapters and has written three books. His research interests include: etiology and the consequences of adolescent drug abuse; structural equation modeling, methodology, and multivariate analysis; human sexuality; health psychology; attitudes and affect related to nuclear war; and cohabitation, marriage, and divorce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wolfinger, N.H., Rabow, J. & Newcomb, M.D. The different voices of helping: Gender differences in recounting dilemmas . Gend. Issues 17, 70–86 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-999-0004-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-999-0004-x

Keywords

Navigation