Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The double-edged sword of negative workplace gossip: when and how negative workplace gossip promotes versus inhibits knowledge hiding

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a widespread phenomenon in organizations, negative workplace gossip may either facilitate or inhibit knowledge hiding among gossip targets. However, existing literature has not reached a consensus on this matter. Based on the conservation of resources theory, this study proposes the double-edged sword effect of negative workplace gossip and explores when and how negative workplace gossip can promote or inhibit knowledge hiding of the targets. This study collected data from 309 Chinese employees through a two-wave questionnaire survey and analyzed the data using Mplus 8.3 and Process Macro. The study found that for targets with an external locus of control, negative workplace gossip stimulates their negative emotions, thereby promoting knowledge hiding. Conversely, for targets with an internal locus of control, negative workplace gossip will promote their relational crafting, thereby inhibiting knowledge hiding. Finally, this study discusses the theoretical and practical implications of these findings and future research directions, which can help scholars and managers have a better understanding of negative workplace gossip.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Adler, A. (1930). Individual psychology. In C. Murchison (Ed.), Psychologies of 1930 (pp. 395–405). Clark University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. G., Weeks, K. P., & Moffitt, K. R. (2005). Turnover intentions and voluntary turnover: The moderating roles of self-monitoring, locus of control, proactive personality, and risk aversion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 980–990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anser, M. K., Ali, M., Usman, M., Rana, M. L. T., & Yousaf, Z. (2021). Ethical leadership and knowledge hiding: An intervening and interactional analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 41(5–6), 307–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arain, G. A., Bhatti, Z. A., Ashraf, N., & Fang, Y.-H. (2020). Top-down knowledge hiding in organizations: An empirical study of the consequences of supervisor knowledge hiding among local and foreign workers in the middle east. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, F. G., Isen, A. M., & Turken, A. U. (1999). A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. Psychological Review, 106(3), 529–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Babalola, M. T., Ren, S., Kobinah, T., Qu, Y. E., Garba, O. A., & Guo, L. (2019). Negative workplace gossip: Its impact on customer service performance and moderating roles of trait mindfulness and forgiveness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babič, K., Černe, M., Škerlavaj, M., & Zhang, P. (2018). The interplay among prosocial motivation, cultural tightness, and uncertainty avoidance in predicting knowledge hiding. Economic and Business Review, 20(3), 395–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banagou, M., Batistič, S., Do, H., & Poell, R. F. (2021). Relational climates moderate the effect of openness to experience on knowledge hiding: A two-country multi-level study. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(11), 60–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bencsik, A., Juhasz, T., & Seben, Z. (2019). The importance of informal knowledge sharing (workplace gossip) in organizations. Economic and social development: Book of proceedings (pp. 46–57).

  • Berry, C. M., Carpenter, N. C., & Barratt, C. L. (2012). Do other-reports of counterproductive work behavior provide an incremental contribution over self-reports? A meta-analytic comparison. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 613–636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolotti, T., & Magnani, L. (2014). An epistemological analysis of gossip and gossip-based knowledge. Synthese, 191(17), 4037–4067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, S. H., Hussain, M., Santoro, G., & Culasso, F. (2023). The impact of organizational ostracism on knowledge hiding: Analysing the sequential mediating role of efficacy needs and psychological distress. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(2), 485–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L., Patil, S., & Packer, D. J. (2017). Organizational identification and workplace behavior: More than meets the eye. Research in Organizational Behavior, 37, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Liang, L. H. (2017). Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 1–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burmeister, A., Wang, M., & Hirschi, A. (2020). Understanding the motivational benefits of knowledge transfer for older and younger workers in age-diverse coworker dyads: An actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(7), 748–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Černe, M., Nerstad, C. G., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2014). What goes around comes around: Knowledge hiding, perceived motivational climate, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(1), 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, G., & Robinson, S. L. (2009). They’re talking about me again: The impact of being the target of gossip on emotional distress and withdrawal. In Academy of management conference (pp. 153–174). Chicago.

  • Chen, J., & Silverthorne, C. (2008). The impact of locus of control on job stress, job performance and job satisfaction in Taiwan. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29(7), 572–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Chen, X.-P., & Huang, S. (2013). Chinese guanxi: An integrative review and new directions for future research. Management and Organization Review, 9(1), 167–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Dong, Y., Zhang, Z., Shaalan, A., Guo, G., & Peng, Y. (2022a). When targets strike back: How negative workplace gossip triggers political acts by employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(2), 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S., Kuo, C.-C., Chen, H.-C., Lin, M.-C., & Kuo, V. (2022b). Effects of workplace gossip on employee mental health: A moderated mediation model of psychological capital and developmental job experience. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 791902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Peng, Y., Shaalan, A., & Tourky, M. (2023a). The hidden costs of negative workplace gossip: Its effect on targets’ behaviors, the mediating role of guanxi closeness, and the moderating effect of need for affiliation. Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., Peng, Y., Tian, J., & Shaalan, A. (2023b). How negative workplace gossip undermines employees’ career growth: From a reputational perspective. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, OnlineFirst.

  • Cheng, B., Peng, Y., Zhou, X., Shaalan, A., Tourky, M., & Dong, Y. (2023c). Negative workplace gossip and targets’ subjective well-being: A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 34(9), 1757–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., & Zweig, D. (2015). How perpetrators and targets construe knowledge hiding in organizations. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(1), 64–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doby, V. J., & Caplan, R. D. (1995). Organizational stress as threat to reputation: Effects on anxiety at work and at home. Academy of Management Journal, 38(4), 1105–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H., & Kim, C. (2007). The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study. The World Economy, 30(2), 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, J., Wen, C., & Prybutok, V. (2014). An assessment of equivalence between paper and social media surveys: The role of social desirability and satisficing. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farh, J.-L., Zhong, C.-B., & Organ, D. W. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the people’s republic of China. Organization Science, 15(2), 241–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Stellar, J., & Keltner, D. (2012). The virtues of gossip: Reputational information sharing as prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(5), 1015–1030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Schultz, M. (2014). Gossip and ostracism promote cooperation in groups. Psychological Science, 25(3), 656–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, P. S., Men, C., Luo, J., & Jia, R. (2018). Knowledge hiding and team creativity: The contingent role of task interdependence. Management Decision, 56(2), 329–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, M., Tian, A. W., Soo, C., Zhang, B., Ho, K. S. B., & Hosszu, K. (2019). Different motivations for knowledge sharing and hiding: The role of motivating work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(7), 783–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, B. M., Randel, A. E., Collins, B. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2018). Changing the focus of locus (of control): A targeted review of the locus of control literature and agenda for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(7), 820–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, S., & Li, Q. (2017). Rebuilding self-control after ego depletion: The role of positive emotions. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on management science and engineering management (pp. 1401–1411). Springer Singapore.

  • Gray-Stanley, J., Muramatsu, N., Heller, T., Hughes, S., Johnson, T., & Ramirez-Valles, J. (2010). Work stress and depression among direct support professionals: The role of work support and locus of control. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(8), 749–761.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halbesleben, J. R. B., Neveu, J.-P., Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., & Westman, M. (2014). Getting to the “COR”: Understanding the role of resources in conservation of resources theory. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1334–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested-self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied Psychology, 50(3), 337–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobfoll, S. E., & Shirom, A. (2000). Conservation of resources theory: Applications to stress and management in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed.), Handbook of organization behavior (Vol. 2, pp. 57–81). Marcel Dekker.

  • Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context: The reality of resources and their consequences. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hongbo, L., Waqas, M., & Tariq, H. (2019). From victim to saboteur: Testing a moderated mediation model of perceived undermining, state hostility, and service sabotage. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 29(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, J. K., & Brotheridge, C. M. (2003). Resources, coping strategies, and emotional exhaustion: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63(3), 490–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalil, D., Xu, X., Jiang, L., & Wang, H. (2022). Do not ask, but you shall still receive: Newcomer reactions to receiving negative gossip. Stress and Health, 38(5), 989–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. G., Li, Y., Akram, Z., & Akram, U. (2022). Does bad gossiping trigger for targets to hide knowledge in morally disengaged? New multi-level insights of team relational conflict. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2370–2394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. G., Li, Y., Akram, Z., & Akram, U. (2023). Why and how targets’ negative workplace gossip exhort knowledge hiding? Shedding light on organizational justice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(5), 1458–1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kniffin, K. M., & Sloan Wilson, D. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 150–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • König, C. J., Debus, M. E., Häusler, S., Lendenmann, N., & Kleinmann, M. (2010). Examining occupational self-efficacy, work locus of control and communication as moderators of the job insecurity—Job performance relationship. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 31(2), 231–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leaperand, C., & Holliday, H. (1995). Gossip in same-gender and cross-gender friends’ conversations. Personal Relationships, 2(3), 237–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lian, H., Li, J. (Kassie), Pan, J., Du, C., & Zhao, Q. (2023). Are gossipers looked down upon? A norm-based perspective on the relation between gossip and gossiper status. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(6), 905–933.

  • Liu, C., Spector, P. E., & Shi, L. (2007). Cross-national job stress: A quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 209–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, X., Kwan, H. K., & Zhang, X. (2020). Introverts maintain creativity: A resource depletion model of negative workplace gossip. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 37(1), 325–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luu, T. T. (2021). Knowledge sharing in the hospitality context: The roles of leader humility, job crafting, and promotion focus. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 94, 102848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallin, M. L., & Mayo, M. (2006). Why did I lose? A conservation of resources view of salesperson failure attributions. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 26(4), 345–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massar, K., Buunk, A. P., & Rempt, S. (2012). Age differences in women’s tendency to gossip are mediated by their mate value. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(1), 106–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu, X., Mao, J.-Y., Huang, R., & Yuan, S. (2022). How employees with a depressogenic attributional style respond to negative workplace gossip: Evidence based on a survey and a scenario experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 189, 111500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muavia, M., Hussain, G., Sahibzada, U. F., & Wan Ismail, W. K. (2023). Workplace spirituality, knowledge-hiding and the mediating role of organizational identification: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(11), 5359–5379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulki, J., & Lassk, F. G. (2019). Joint impact of ethical climate and external work locus of control on job meaningfulness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 46–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murtaza, G., Neveu, J. P., Khan, R., & Talpur, Q. U. A. (2023). Gossip 2.0: The role of social media and moral attentiveness on counterproductive work behaviour. Applied Psychology, 72(4), 1478–1505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2011). Locus of control and organizational embeddedness. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 84(1), 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., Sorensen, K. L., & Eby, L. T. (2006). Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1057–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang, H., & Ruan, Y. (2023). Determining influences of information irrelevance, information overload and communication overload on WeChat discontinuance intention: The moderating role of exhaustion. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(7), 777–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee, Y. W., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity: Goal orientations as antecedents and in-group social status as moderating contingency. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 813–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, M. L., & Karan, A. (2020). Who gossips and how in everyday life? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(2), 185–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, K., & Jex, S. M. (2012). Coworker incivility and incivility targets’ work effort and counterproductive work behaviors: The moderating role of supervisor social support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 150–161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, D. N., Kaiser, C. F., & Hittner, J. B. (2000). Disaster preparedness: Relationships among prior experience, personal characteristics, and distress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(7), 1396–1420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the life orientation test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1063–1078.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E., & Outerbridge, A. N. (1986). Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 432–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2016). Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: Antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(6), 1199–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackelford, T. K. (1997). Perceptions of betrayal and the design of the mind. In J. A. Simpson & D. Kenrick (Eds.), Evolutionary social psychology (pp. 73–108). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, S. K. (2019). Territoriality, task performance, and workplace deviance: Empirical evidence on role of knowledge hiding. Journal of Business Research, 97, 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in organizations as a function of employee’s locus of control. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, T., Schilpzand, P., & Liu, Y. (2023). Workplace gossip: An integrative review of its antecedents, functions, and consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(2), 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Examining job crafting from an interpersonal perspective: Is employee job crafting related to the well-being of colleagues? Applied Psychology, 64(4), 727–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the job-related affective well-being scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219–230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, F., & Shi, W. (2022). The effect of work-leisure conflict on front-line employees’ work engagement: A cross-level study from the emotional perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 39(1), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Wang, J., Lin, S., & Li, J. (2019). Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: The role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement. Energy Policy, 126, 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrzesniewski, A., LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. In Advances in positive organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Wu, L.-Z., Birtch, T. A., Chiang, F. F. T., & Zhang, H. (2018a). Perceptions of negative workplace gossip: A self-consistency theory framework. Journal of Management, 44(5), 1873–1898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L.-Z., & Ma, J. (2018b). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in china: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., Huang, Q., Wang, H., & Shen, M. (2019). Coping with negative workplace gossip: The joint roles of self-monitoring and impression management tactics. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, J., Huang, Q., Yan, M., & Liang, Y. (2024). It is tough to detach from gossip: The impact of perceived negative workplace gossip on life satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39, 497–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao, Z., Luo, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Gossip is a fearful thing: The impact of negative workplace gossip on knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1755–1775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y., Yang, L., Cheng, X., & Wei, J. (2021). What is bullying hiding? Exploring antecedents and potential dimension of knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 1146–1169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., & Min, M. (2019). The negative consequences of knowledge hiding in NPD project teams: The roles of project work attributes. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 225–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., Wang, X., Nerstad, C. G., Ren, H., & Gao, R. (2022). Motivational climates, work passion, and behavioral consequences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 43(9), 1579–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Xia, Q., He, P., Sheard, G., & Wan, P. (2016). Workplace ostracism and knowledge hiding in service organizations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 59, 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Zhao, S., Chen, Y., & Yu, X. (2023). Bystanders’ reactions to leader knowledge hiding: The roles of moral disengagement and moral identity. Journal of Business Research, 165, 114029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z. E., Yan, Y., Che, X. X., & Meier, L. L. (2015). Effect of workplace incivility on end-of-work negative affect: Examining individual and organizational moderators in a daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(1), 117–130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Martinescu, E., Beersma, B., & Wei, F. (2023). The double-edged sword of negative supervisor gossip: When and why negative supervisor gossip promotes versus inhibits feedback seeking behavior among gossip targets. Human Relations, OnlineFirst.

  • Zong, B., Xu, S., Zhang, L., & Qu, J. (2021). Dealing with negative workplace gossip: From the perspective of face. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 629376.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zong, B., Martinescu, E., Beersma, B., Xu, S., & Zhang, L. (2024). How multi-source gossip affects targets’ emotions and strategic behavioral responses. Journal of Business Ethics, 189, 385–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by China’s National Natural Science Foundation (72172086 and 71772116) and “Shuguang Program” supported by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (21SG41).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongdan Zhao.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Negative workplace gossip

We used a three-item scale developed by Chandra and Robinson (2009).

  1. 1.

    In the past six months, others (e.g., coworkers and/or supervisors) communicated damaging information about me in the workplace

  2. 2.

    In the past six months, others (e.g., coworkers and/or supervisors) spread unfavorable gossip about me in the workplace

  3. 3.

    In the past six months, others (e.g., coworkers and/or supervisors) made negative allegations about me in the workplace

Chandra and Robinson (2009). They’re talking about me again: The impact of being the target of gossip on emotional distress and withdrawal. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management.

Negative emotions

We utilized a 5-item negative emotions scale adapted by Liu et al. (2007) from the Job-related Affective Well-being Scale (JWAS, Van Katwyk et al., 2000).

  1. 1.

    My job makes me feel angry

  2. 2.

    My job makes me feel anxious

  3. 3.

    My job makes me feel disgusted

  4. 4.

    My job makes me feel frightened

  5. 5.

    My job makes me feel furious

Liu, C., Spector, P. E., & Shi, L. (2007). Cross-national job stress: A quantitative and qualitative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(2), 209–239.

Van Katwyk, P. T., Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2000). Using the Job-Related Affective Well-Being Scale (JAWS) to investigate affective responses to work stressors. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 219–230.

Relational crafting

We employed a 5-item scale developed by Slemp and Vella-Brodrick (2013) to measure the relational crafting of gossip targets in the workplace.

  1. 1.

    Make an effort to get to know people well at work

  2. 2.

    Organise or attend work related social functions

  3. 3.

    Organise special events in the workplace (e.g., celebrating a co-worker's birthday)

  4. 4.

    Choose to mentor new employees (officially or unofficially)

  5. 5.

    Make friends with people at work who have similar skills or interests

Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126–146.

Locus of control

According to the recommendations of Mulki and Lassk (2019), we used a four-item scale specifically designed to measure external locus of control, which was taken from the 16-item scale developed by Spector (1988).

  1. 1.

    The main difference between people who make a lot of money and people who make a little money is luck.

  2. 2.

    It takes a lot of luck to be an outstanding employee.

  3. 3.

    Promotions are usually a matter of good fortune.

  4. 4.

    Getting the job you want is mostly a matter of luck.

Mulki, J., & Lassk, F. G. (2019). Joint impact of ethical climate and external work locus of control on job meaningfulness. Journal of Business Research, 99, 46–56.

Spector, P. E. (1988). Development of the work locus of control scale. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61(4), 335–340.

Knowledge hiding

We utilized a 4-item scale developed by Rhee and Choi (2017) to measure the knowledge hiding of gossip targets.

  1. 1.

    I agreed to help him/her but never really intended to.

  2. 2.

    I pretended that I did not know the information.

  3. 3.

    I said that I did not know even though I did.

  4. 4.

    I tried to hide innovative solutions and achievements.

Rhee, Y. W., & Choi, J. N. (2017). Knowledge management behavior and individual creativity: Goal orientations as antecedents and in-group social status as moderating contingency: Knowledge management behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(6), 813–832.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, H., Ma, Y. & Chen, Y. The double-edged sword of negative workplace gossip: when and how negative workplace gossip promotes versus inhibits knowledge hiding. Curr Psychol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05954-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05954-1

Keywords

Navigation