Skip to main content
Log in

Attachment, emotion regulation difficulties, and forgiveness to the ex-partner: The moderating role of sex and joint children

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined emotion regulation difficulties (i.e., nonacceptance, daily interference, lack of awareness, lack of control, and lack of clarity) as possible mediators of the association between adult attachment and forgiveness in the context of divorce/separation, and the moderating role of sex and joint children. A sample of 1,185 participants completed measures of attachment, emotion regulation difficulties and forgiveness. Results revealed that in the whole sample attachment anxiety was only directly whereas attachment avoidance was indirectly associated with the degree of forgiveness to the ex-partner through lack of awareness. However, multigroup analysis showed that patterns observed in the whole sample are different for men and women having children or not with the ex-partner. The findings of this research show the importance of attachment and emotion regulation difficulties to understand the process of dealing with resentment and hostility towards an ex-partner in the context of divorce/ separation and demonstrate how sex and parenting differences modulate these relations. Among other aspects, the model had a greater explanatory power in people without joint children. In sum. these findings and their implications are discussed and the importance of considering moderating variables when examining forgiveness and other indicators of adjustment to divorce/separation is highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to privacy issues related to the participants but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. As suggested by one of the reviewers, Harman’s single factor test was run to assess whether common method bias (CMB) affected our results. A single factor had a very poor fit (χ2(464) = 9765.96, p < .0001; RMSEA = .130, CFI = .620, TLI = .594) and only accounted for 35.3% of the variance of items. According to the traditional interpretation of the test, these results reveal that CMB may not a critical treat to the hypothesized relationships in our model.

  2. During the review process we were asked to estimate our model using scale scores to test the fit of the structural part of the model. We used summed items to represent each dimension and then, estimated a path model in which all variables were treated as observed. The model had a good fit to the data (χ2(7) = 24.99, p = .001, RMSEA = .047, CFI = .994, TLI = .971). Even though this seems to provide evidence of the validity of our theoretical model, it must be noted that latent variables and scale scores are not equivalent. Latent variables are free of measurement error, whereas scales scores are not. Such error produce biased results (Lord & Novic, 1968; Rdz-Navarro, 2019; Skrondal & Laake, 2001) even when the model fits the data. For this reason, true latent variable models should be given precedence compared to models using scale scores (Rdz-Navarro, 2019).

References

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Fund for Scientific and Technologic Development of Chile [FONDECYT 1150044].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mónica Guzmán-González.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee from the institutions involved, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 3

Table 4

Table 3 Latent correlations estimates between factors using the whole sample
Table 4 Estimated latent means and variances for each factor and each group

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guzmán-González, M., Navarro, K. & Tay-Karapas, K. Attachment, emotion regulation difficulties, and forgiveness to the ex-partner: The moderating role of sex and joint children. Curr Psychol 42, 31687–31700 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04191-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-04191-8

Keywords

Navigation