Abstract
Environmental issues are major global risks that call for urgent pro-environmental actions. The current literature suggested that many perceive environmental issues as psychologically distant. This perception is considered as one important psychological barrier that limits the public from adopting sustainable pro-environmental actions. The perception of environmental issues has ignited discussion of Construal Level Theory (CLT) as a theoretical framework to understand how perceived psychological distance influences attitude towards environmental protection. Our review suggested that the public may perceive environmental issues as psychologically distant on both social and spatial dimensions. We proposed that optimism bias might be one of the reasons for this. Our review highlighted the important role of psychological proximity in arousing concerns and eliciting positive attitudes toward the efforts of addressing existing environmental issues. Inducing a proximal psychological distance may elicit stronger positive attitudes towards pro-environmental behavior intention. We discussed moderators including efficacy of policy and social pressure that elucidate the role of psychological distance on attitude. Skepticism may cause one to perceive environmental issues as psychologically distant, reducing support for environmental policies. We recommended CLT as a useful theoretical framework to improve current methods on motivating and promoting actual pro-environmental behavior. We proposed that narratives of personal experiences and objective scientific reports could complement each other in communicating environmental risks. Many are often not keenly aware of environmental issues. For this reason, using a variety of approaches and tools to proximise environmental issues is important and beneficial in raising environmental concerns and promoting sustainable actions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Action Control (pp. 11–39). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
Bandstra, N. F., Chambers, C. T., McGrath, P. J., & Moore, C. (2011). The behavioural expression of empathy to others’ pain versus others’ sadness in young children. Pain, 152(5), 1074–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2011.01.024
Bang, H.-K., Ellinger, A. E., Hadjimarcou, J., & Traichal, P. A. (2000). Consumer concern, knowledge, belief, and attitude toward renewable energy: An application of the reasoned action theory. Psychology and Marketing, 17(6), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200006)17:6%3c449::AID-MAR2%3e3.0.CO;2-8
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 135(4), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.609
Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 136(4), 610–622. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.4.610
Bergquist, M., Nilsson, A., & Schultz, P. W. (2019). Experiencing a severe weather event increases concern about climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00220
Bi, J., Zhang, Y [Yongliang], & Zhang, B. (2010). Public perception of environmental issues across socioeconomic characteristics: A survey study in Wujin, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 4(3), 361–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0017-4
Bloom, P. (2017). Empathy and its discontents. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.004
Bobo Kovac, V., & Rise, J. (2011). Predicting the intention to quit smoking in a Norwegian sample. Nordic Psychology, 63(3), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276/a000040
Boon, H. J. (2016). Perceptions of climate change risk in four disaster-impacted rural Australian towns. Regional Environmental Change, 16(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0744-3
Boudet, H., Bugden, D., Zanocco, C., & Maibach, E. (2016). The effect of industry activities on public support for ‘fracking.’ Environmental Politics, 25(4), 593–612. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1153771
Boudet, H., Zanocco, C., Howe, P., & Clarke, C. (2018). The effect of geographic proximity to unconventional oil and gas development on public support for hydraulic fracturing. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 38(9), 1871–1890. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12989
Breakwell, G. M. (2010). Models of risk construction: Some applications to climate change. Wires Climate Change, 1(6), 857–870. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.74
Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1191–1205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.47.6.1191
Breves, P., & Schramm, H. (2021). Bridging psychological distance: The impact of immersive media on distant and proximal environmental issues. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106606
Brügger, A. (2020). Understanding the psychological distance of climate change: The limitations of construal level theory and suggestions for alternative theoretical perspectives. Global Environmental Change, 60, 102023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102023
Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., & Dessai, S. (2016). “Proximising” climate change reconsidered: A construal level theory perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 46, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.04.004
Bryan, J. F., & Locke, E. A [E. A.] (1967). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 51(3), 274–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024566
Carmichael, J. T., Brulle, R. J., & Huxster, J. K. (2017). The great divide: Understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic Change, 141(4), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1
Cheng, Y., Ao, C., Mao, B., & Xu, L. (2021). Influential factors of environmental behavior to reduce air pollution: integrating theories of planned behavior and psychological distance. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2021.1973972
Chu, H., & Liu, S. (2021). Light at the end of the tunnel: Influence of vaccine availability and vaccination intention on people’s consideration of the COVID-19 vaccine. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 286, 114315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114315
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2018). Taking climate change here and now – mitigating ideological polarization with psychological distance. Global Environmental Change, 53, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.09.013
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2019). Emotion and the psychological distance of climate change. Science Communication, 41(6), 761–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019889637
Chu, H., & Yang, J. Z. (2020). Risk or efficacy? How psychological distance influences climate change engagement. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 40(4), 758–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13446
Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.749
Clarke, C. E., Bugden, D., Hart, P. S., Stedman, R. C., Jacquet, J. B., Evensen, D. T., & Boudet, H. S. (2016). How geographic distance and political ideology interact to influence public perception of unconventional oil/natural gas development. Energy Policy, 97, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.07.032
Clarke, C. E., Hart, P. S., Schuldt, J. P., Evensen, D. T., Boudet, H. S., Jacquet, J. B., & Stedman, R. C. (2015). Public opinion on energy development: The interplay of issue framing, top-of-mind associations, and political ideology. Energy Policy, 81, 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.019
Coquet, M., Mercier, D., & Fleury-Bahi, G. (2019). Assessment of the exposure to coastal flood risk by inhabitants of French coasts: The effect of spatial optimism and temporal pessimism. Ocean & Coastal Management, 177, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.05.004
Dagher, G. K., Itani, O., & Kassar, A. N. (2015). The impact of environment concern and attitude on green purchasing behavior: Gender as the moderator. Contemporary Management Research, 11(2), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.13625
Danish, K. M., & Naved, K. M. (2016). Environmental concern to attitude towards green products: Evidences from India. Serbian Journal of Management, 11(2), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm11-9241
Davis, J. I., Gross, J. J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2011). Psychological distance and emotional experience: What you see is what you get. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 11(2), 438–444. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021783
Demski, C., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N., Sposato, R. G., & Spence, A [Alexa] (2017). Experience of extreme weather affects climate change mitigation and adaptation responses. Climatic Change, 140(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1837-4
Deng, Y., Wang, M., & Yousefpour, R. (2017). How do people’s perceptions and climatic disaster experiences influence their daily behaviors regarding adaptation to climate change? - A case study among young generations. The Science of the Total Environment, 581–582, 840–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.022
Duke, J. R., & Holt, E. A. (2022). Seeing climate change: psychological distance and connection to nature. Environmental Education Research, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2042205
Edwards, S. M., Lee, J. K., & La Ferle, C. (2009). Does place matter when shopping online? Perceptions of similarity and familiarity as indicators of psychological distance. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 10(1), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2009.10722161
Evensen, D., & Brown-Steiner, B. (2018). Public perception of the relationship between climate change and unconventional gas development (‘fracking’) in the US. Climate Policy, 18(5), 556–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2017.1389686
Evensen, D., & Stedman, R. (2016). Scale matters: Variation in perceptions of shale gas development across national, state, and local levels. Energy Research & Social Science, 20, 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.010
Eyal, T., Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Chaiken, S. (2009). When values matter: Expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023
Fleury-Bahi, G. (2008). Environmental risk: Perception and target with local versus global evaluation. Psychological Reports, 102(1), 185–193. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.102.1.185-193
Fox, J., McKnight, J., Sun, Y., Maung, D., & Crawfis, R. (2020). Using a serious game to communicate risk and minimize psychological distance regarding environmental pollution. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101320
Frías-Jamilena, D. M., Fernández-Ruano, M. L., & Polo-Peña, A. I. (2022). Gamified environmental interpretation as a strategy for improving tourist behavior in support of sustainable tourism: The moderating role of psychological distance. Tourism Management, 91, 104519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2022.104519
Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental concern, attitude toward frugality, and ease of behavior as determinants of pro-environmental behavior intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.003
Fultz, J., Schaller, M., & Cialdini, R. B. (1988). Empathy, sadness, and distress three related but distinct vicarious affective responses to another’s suffering. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616728801400201
Gattig, A. (2002). Intertemporal decision making: Studies on the working of myopia. https://research.rug.nl/en/publications/intertemporal-decision-making-studies-on-the-working-of-myopia. Accessed 28 Apr 2022.
Geng, L., Liu, T., Zhou, K., & Yang, G. (2018). Can power affect environmental risk attitude toward nuclear energy? Energy Policy, 113, 87–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.051
Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. The American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wires Climate Change, 2(6), 801–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.143
Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., Corral, V., Güntherf, H., Hanyu, K., Hine, D., Kaiser, F. G., Korpela, K., Lima, L. M., Mertig, A. G., Mira, R. G., Moser, G., Passafaro, P., Pinheiro, J. Q., Saini, S., . . ., & Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.06.001
Gifford, R., & Sussman, R. (2012). Environmental attitudes. In S. D. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 65–80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.013.0004
Grob, A. (1995). A structural model of environmental attitudes and behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90004-7
Håkanson, L., & Ambos, B. (2010). The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.06.001
Han, R., & Xu, J [Jian] (2020). A comparative study of the role of interpersonal communication, traditional media and social media in pro-environmental behavior: A China-based study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061883
Harth, N. S., Leach, C. W., & Kessler, T. (2013). Guilt, anger, and pride about in-group environmental behaviour: Different emotions predict distinct intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.005
Hatfield, J., & Job, R. F. S. (2001). Optimism bias about environmental degradation: The role of the range of impact of precautions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0190
Hockerts, K. (2015). The social entrepreneurial antecedents scale (SEAS): A validation study. Social Enterprise Journal, 11(3), 260–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-05-2014-0026
Hsu, C. H. C., & Huang, S. (2010). Formation of tourist behavioral intention and actual behavior. In J. Chen (Ed.), Proceedings of ICSSSM 10 (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2010.5530150
Huebner, A. (2012). Public perceptions of destination vulnerability to climate change and implications for long-haul travel decisions to small island states. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(7), 939–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2012.667107
Jakovcevic, A., Ferreiro, J., Páramo, P., & Mustaca, A. (2013). Evaluation of the effects of spatial optimism and temporal pessimism in assessments of environmental conditions in Argentina. PsyEcology, 4(2), 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2013.10773868
Jones, C., Hine, D. W., & Marks, A. D. G. (2017). The future is now: Reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Analysis: An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 37(2), 331–341. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12601
Kim, D. H., & Song, D. (2019). Can brand experience shorten consumers’ psychological distance toward the brand? The effect of brand experience on consumers’ construal level. Journal of Brand Management, 26(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-018-0134-0
Kim, S. Y., & Wolinsky-Nahmias, Y. (2014). Cross-national public opinion on climate change: The effects of affluence and vulnerability. Global Environmental Politics, 14(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00215
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620220145401
Konisky, D. M., Hughes, L., & Kaylor, C. H. (2016). Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Climatic Change, 134(4), 533–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1555-3
Konstam, V., Chernoff, M., & Deveney, S. (2001). Toward forgiveness: The role of shame, guilt anger, and empathy. Counseling and Values, 46(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2001.tb00204.x
Lee, A. R. (2017). Psychological proximity to issues of the elderly: The role of age-morphing technology in campaigns for the elderly. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.046
Lee, A. R., Hon, L., & Won, J. (2018). Psychological proximity as a predictor of participation in a social media issue campaign. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.006
Leiserowitz, A. A. (2005). American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Analysis, 25(6), 1433–1442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2014). Traversing psychological distance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.001
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.12.009
Lima, M. L., & Castro, P. (2005). Cultural theory meets the community: Worldviews and local issues. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.11.004
Liu, W., Shao, W., & Wang, Q. (2021). Psychological distance from environmental pollution and willingness to participate in second-hand online transactions: An experimental survey in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 124656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124656
Locke, E. A [Edwin A.], Chah, D.‑O., Harrison, S., & Lustgarten, N. (1989). Separating the effects of goal specificity from goal level. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(89)90053-8
Locke, E. A [Edwin A.], & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705
Locke, E. A [Edwin A.], & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3–4), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.004
Loy, L. S., & Spence, A [Alexa]. (2020). Reducing, and bridging, the psychological distance of climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101388
Lutchyn, Y., & Yzer, M. (2011). Construal level theory and theory of planned behavior: Time frame effects on salient belief generation. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 595–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.551991
Maiella, R., La Malva, P., Marchetti, D., Pomarico, E., Di Crosta, A., Palumbo, R., Cetara, L., Di Domenico, A., & Verrocchio, M. C. (2020). The psychological distance and climate change: A systematic review on the mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 568899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568899
Mair, J., & Noboa, E. (2014). Social entrepreneurship: How intentions to create a social venture are formed. In J. Mair, J. Robinson, & K. Hockerts (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship (pp. 121–135). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230625655_8
McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1308–1314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02240.x
Milfont, T. L [Taciano. L.]. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. (In V. Corral-Verdugo, C. H. Garcia-Cadana & M. Frias-Arment (Eds.)). Nova Science.
Milfont, T. L [Taciano. L.], Abrahamse, W., & McCarthy, N. (2011). Spatial and temporal biases in assessments of environmental conditions in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 56–67. https://www.academia.edu/download/54661492/NZJP_Vol_2_2011.pdf#page=55. Accessed 17 July 2021.
Millarhouse, A. Z., Vatovec, C., Niles, M. T., & Ivakhiv, A. (2020). What’s in your body of water? A pilot study using metaphoric framing to reduce the psychological distance in pharmaceutical pollution risk communication. Environmental Management, 65(5), 630–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01275-8
Mohai, P., Simões, S., & Brechin, S. R. (2010). Environmental concerns, values and meanings in the Beijing and Detroit Metropolitan areas. International Sociology, 25(6), 778–817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580910378138
Monestel-Umaña, S., & Schulz, P. J. (2015). Applying the construal level theory to improve oral self-care behavior: A pilot study. Journal of Communication in Healthcare, 8(2), 134–142. https://doi.org/10.1179/1753807615Y.0000000014
Niles, M. T., Lubell, M., & van Haden, R. (2013). Perceptions and responses to climate policy risks among California farmers. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1752–1760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.08.005
Ogunbode, C. A [Charles A.], Doran, R., & Böhm, G. (2020). Individual and local flooding experiences are differentially associated with subjective attribution and climate change concern. Climatic Change, 162(4), 2243–2255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02793-4
Pahl, S., & Bauer, J. (2013). Overcoming the distance. Environment and Behavior, 45(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511417618
Paivio, S. C., & Laurent, C. (2001). Empathy and emotion regulation: Reprocessing memories of childhood abuse. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(200102)57:2%3c213::AID-JCLP7%3e3.0.CO;2-B
Papoulis, D., Kaika, D., Bampatsou, C., & Zervas, E. (2015). Public perception of climate change in a period of economic crisis. Climate, 3(3), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli3030715
Park, H. S., Ulusoy, E., Choi, S. Y., & Lee, H. E. (2020). Temporal distance and descriptive norms on environmental behaviors: A cross-cultural examination of construal-level theory. SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824402091457. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914576
Pianta, S., & Sisco, M. R [Matthew R.] (2020). A hot topic in hot times: How media coverage of climate change is affected by temperature abnormalities. Environmental Research Letters, 15(11), 114038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abb732
Pidgeon, N. F., Lorenzoni, I., & Poortinga, W [Wouter] (2008). Climate change or nuclear power—No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change, 18(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
Pronin, E., Olivola, C. Y., & Kennedy, K. A. (2008). Doing unto future selves as you would do unto others: Psychological distance and decision making. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(2), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207310023
Raja, U. S., & Carrico, A. R. (2021). A qualitative exploration of individual experiences of environmental virtual reality through the lens of psychological distance. Environmental Communication, 15(5), 594–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1871052
Reckien, D., & Petkova, E. P. (2019). Who is responsible for climate change adaptation? Environmental Research Letters, 14(1), 14010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaf07a
Roberts, W., Strayer, J., & Denham, S. (2014). Empathy, anger, guilt: Emotions and prosocial behaviour. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement, 46(4), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035057
Sacchi, S., Riva, P., & Aceto, A. (2016). Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.006
Schäfer, M. S., Ivanova, A., & Schmidt, A. (2014). What drives media attention for climate change? Explaining issue attention in Australian, German and Indian print media from 1996 to 2010. International Communication Gazette, 76(2), 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048513504169
Schuldt, J. P., Rickard, L. N., & Yang, Z. J. (2018). Does reduced psychological distance increase climate engagement? On the limits of localizing climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 55, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.02.001
Schultz, P. W., Milfont, T. L [Taciano L.], Chance, R. C., Tronu, G., Luís, S., Ando, K., Rasool, F., Roose, P. L., Ogunbode, C. A [Charles Adedayo], Castro, J., & Gouveia, V. V. (2014). Cross-cultural evidence for spatial bias in beliefs about the severity of environmental problems. Environment and Behavior, 46(3), 267–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512458579
Scruggs, L., & Benegal, S. (2012). Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 505–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.01.002
Shakeela, A., & Becken, S. (2015). Understanding tourism leaders’ perceptions of risks from climate change: An assessment of policy-making processes in the Maldives using the social amplification of risk framework (SARF). Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 23(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2014.918135
Singh, A. S., Zwickle, A., Bruskotter, J. T., & Wilson, R. (2017). The perceived psychological distance of climate change impacts and its influence on support for adaptation policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 73, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.04.011
Sisco, M. R [Matthew Ryan] (2021). The effects of weather experiences on climate change attitudes and behaviors. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 52, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2021.09.001
Skippon, S., & Garwood, M. (2011). Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance. Transportation Research Part d: Transport and Environment, 16(7), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005
Skippon, S., Kinnear, N., Lloyd, L., & Stannard, J. (2016). How experience of use influences mass-market drivers’ willingness to consider a battery electric vehicle: A randomised controlled trial. Transportation Research Part a: Policy and Practice, 92, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.06.034
Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Attitudes and recycling: Does the measurement of affect enhance behavioral prediction? Psychology and Marketing, 11(4), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220110405
So, J., & Shen, L. (2016). Personalization of risk through convergence of self- and character-risk. Communication Research, 43(8), 1094–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215570656
Spence, A [A.], Poortinga, W [W.], Butler, C., & Pidgeon, N [N.] (2011). Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Climate Change, 1(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1059
Spence, A [A.], Poortinga, W [W.], & Pidgeon, N [N.] (2012). The psychological distance of climate change. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 957–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01695.x
Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643–662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
Suh, M., & Hsieh, G. (2016). Designing for future behaviors: Understanding the effect of temporal distance on planned behaviors. In J. Kaye, A. Druin, C. Lampe, D. Morris, & J. P. Hourcade (Eds.), CHI 2016: Proceedings, the 34th Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose Convention Center : San Jose, CA, USA, May 7–12 (pp. 1084–1096). The Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858591
Tan, H., Wong-Parodi, G., & Xu, J [Jianhua] (2020). Not under my backyard? Psychological distance, local acceptance, and shale gas development in China. Energy Research & Social Science, 61, 101336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101336
Trautmann, S. T. (2019). Distance from a distance: The robustness of psychological distance effects. Theory and Decision, 87(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-019-09696-6
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2000). Temporal construal and time-dependent changes in preference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 876–889. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.876
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2012). Construal level theory. In P. A. M. van Lange (Ed.), Handbook of theories of social psychology. Volume 1 (pp. 118–134). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n7
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70013-X
Uzzell, D. (2000). The psycho-spatial dimensions of global environmental problems. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20(4), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0175
Valentine, M. (2018). When equity seems unfair: The role of justice enforceability in temporary team coordination. Academy of Management Journal, 61(6), 2081–2105. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.1101
van Boven, L., Kane, J., McGraw, A. P., & Dale, J. (2010). Feeling close: Emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(6), 872–885. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019262
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., & Leiserowitz, A. (2015). Improving public engagement with climate change: Five “best practice” insights from psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 10(6), 758–763. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615598516
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006). Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude – behavioral intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 19(2), 169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3
Vignemont, F. de, & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(10), 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.008
Wang, S., Hurlstone, M. J., Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Lawrence, C. (2019). Climate change from a distance: An analysis of construal level and psychological distance from climate change. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00230
Wang, S., Hurlstone, M. J., Leviston, Z., Walker, I., & Lawrence, C. (2021). Construal-level theory and psychological distancing: Implications for grand environmental challenges. One Earth, 4(4), 482–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.009
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
Weber, E. U. (2010). What shapes perceptions of climate change? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(3), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.41
Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
Whitmarsh, L. (2011). Scepticism and uncertainty about climate change: Dimensions, determinants and change over time. Global Environmental Change, 21(2), 690–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.01.016
Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing learning, communication and public engagement about climate change – some lessons from recent literature. Environmental Education Research, 20(3), 387–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.812720
Wied, M. de, Goudena, P. P., & Matthys, W. (2005). Empathy in boys with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 46(8), 867–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.00389.x
Williams, L. E., Stein, R., & Galguera, L. (2014). The distinct affective consequences of psychological distance and construal level. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1123–1138. https://doi.org/10.1086/674212
Wong, K.-K. (2010). Environmental awareness, governance and public participation: Public perception perspectives. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 67(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207231003683424
Xu, Z., Cao, Q., & Li, S. (2020). The role of psychological distance in influencing pro-environmental behavior spread: Perceived justice enforceability as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 567093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567093
Yang, X., Dong, X., Jiang, Q., & Liu, G. (2019). Factors influencing public concern about environmental protection: An analysis from China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2019, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5983160
Zanocco, C., Boudet, H., Nilson, R., & Flora, J. (2019). Personal harm and support for climate change mitigation policies: Evidence from 10 U.S. communities impacted by extreme weather. Global Environmental Change, 59, 101984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101984
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y [Yechen], Song, Z., & Lew, A. A. (2019). Assessment bias of environmental quality (AEQ), consideration of future consequences (CFC), and environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) in tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(5), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1597102
Zhuang, J., Lapinski, M. K., & Peng, W. (2018). Crafting messages to promote water conservation: Using time-framed messages to boost conservation actions in the United States and China. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(5), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12509
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the review conception. Yi-Ting Tang performed the literature search and wrote the drafts of the manuscript. Weng-Tink Chooi suggested improvements, edited and finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
This is a narrative review. No human participants or animals were tested for this article.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, YT., Chooi, WT. From concern to action: the role of psychological distance in attitude towards environmental issues. Curr Psychol 42, 26570–26586 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03774-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03774-9