Abstract
The psychological construct of nature relatedness has received increasing attention in the research on pro-environmental attitudes and psychological well-being. Public interest in scientific issues is an important issue in scientific literacy research. The aim of this research was to examine the relationships among adult interest in scientific issues, nature relatedness, sustainability attitudes, and their psychological well-being. Probability proportional to size sampling, which is a method used to divide a population into several stratums (systematic sampling was used for these stratums according to their size in proportion to the population), was conducted. Four hundred thirty-three citizens aged between 18 and 70 years were involved as participants. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized to test specific theory-based hypotheses. The results revealed that adult interest in scientific issues had a direct effect on adult nature relatedness, which, in turn, had direct effects on sustainability attitudes and psychological well-being. It was also found that adult interest in scientific issues had a partial and indirect mediation effect on the sustainability attitudes of the participants. This research has provided additional insights since the proposed model has demonstrated that individuals interested in scientific issues were more likely to experience better well-being and possess positive sustainability attitudes, which are promising findings.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annamalai, N., Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., & Buathong, S. (2019). Needs and Facebook addiction: How important are psychological well-being and performance-approach goals? Current Psychology, online first., 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00516-2.
Berto, R. (2005). Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25, 249–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001.
Bodin, M., & Hartig, T. (2003). Does the outdoor environment matter for psychological restoration gained through running? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(2), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(01)00038-3.
Bogozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Academic of Marketing Science, 16, 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327.
Borgonovi, F., & Pál, J. (2016). A framework for the analysis of student well-being in the PISA 2015 research: Being 15 in 2015. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 140, OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlpszwghvvb-en.
Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2017). Connecting students to nature – how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866.
Capaldi, C., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: A meta-analysis. Frontier in Psychology, 5, Article 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.
Casale, S., Lecchi, S., & Fioravanti, G. (2015). The association between psychological well-being and problematic use of internet communicative services among young people. The Journal of Psychology, 149(5), 480–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2014.905432.
Cervinka, R., Röderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2011). Are nature lovers happy? On various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 379–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105311416873.
Cheung, G. W., & Lau, R. S. (2008). Testing mediation and suppression effects of latent variables: Bootstrapping with structural equation models. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), 296–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428107300343.
Chin, C. K., Munip, H., Miyadera, R., Thoe, N. K., Ch’ng, Y. S., & Promsing, N. (2019). Promoting education for sustainable development in teacher education integrating blended learning and digital tools: An evaluation with exemplary cases. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(1), em1653. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/99513.
Clark, C. F., Kotchen, M. J., & Moore, M. R. (2003). Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 237–246.
Cordano, M., & Frieze, I. H. (2000). Pollution reduction preferences of U.S. environmental managers: Applying Ajzen’s theory of planned behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 627–641 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1556358.
Czerw, A. (2019). Diagnosing well-being in work context – Eudemonic well-being in the workplace questionnaire. Current Psychology, 38, 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9614-8.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.
Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506064240.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50 https://www.jstor.org/stable/3151312.
Francis, J. E., & Davis, T. (2015). Adolescents’ sustainability concerns and reasons for not consuming sustainably. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(1), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12150.
Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Bai, Y. (2018). Pro-environmental awareness and behaviors on campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77953.
Gallego-Álvarez, I., Galindo, M., & Rodríguez-Rosa, M. (2015). Analysis of the sustainable society index worldwide: A study from the biplot perspective. Social Indicators Research, 120(1), 29–65.
Gombert-Courvoisier, S., Sennes, V., & Ribeyre, F. (2014). An analysis of viewpoints on education for responsible consumption in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(3), 259–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2011-0080.
Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005.
Guzey, S. S., Ring-Whalen, E. A., Harwell, M., & Peralta, Y. (2019). Life STEM: A case study of life science learning through engineering design. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9860-0.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Hartig, T., Evans, G. W., Jamner, L. D., Davis, D. S., & Gärling, T. (2003). Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford happiness questionnaire: A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00213-6.
Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2008). Engaging with the natural environment: The role of affective connection and identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28, 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.001.
Holmes, K., Gore, J., Smith, M., & Lloyd, A. (2018). An integrated analysis of school students’ aspirations for STEM careers: Which student and school factors are most predictive? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(4), 655–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z.
Hopkinson, P., & James, P. (2010). Practical pedagogy for embedding ESD in science, technology, engineering and mathematics curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676371011077586.
Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectdness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
Jack, B. M., & Lin, H.-s. (2017). Making learning interesting and its application to the science classroom. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 137–164.
Jack, B. M., Lin, H.-s., & Yore, L. D. (2014). The synergistic effect of affective factors on student learning outcomes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(8), 1084–1101.
Kaczmarek, L. D., Behnke, M., Enko, J., Hoffman, A., Kiciński, M., Paruszewski, J., Szabat, M., & Dombrowski, S. U. (2019). Would you be happier if you moved more? Physical activity focusing illusion. Current Psychology, online first, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00315-9.
Kahneman, D., Diener, E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2.
Kaplan, R. (2001). The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits. Environment and Behavior, 33, 507–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115.
Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., & Fuller, R. A. (2013). What are the benefits of interacting with nature? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 913–935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913.
Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning, and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
Lankenau, G. R. (2018). Fostering connectedness to nature in higher education. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1225674.
Lin, H., Hong, Z., & Chen, Y. (2013). Exploring the development of college students’ situational interest in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2152–2173.
MacKerron, G., & Mourato, S. (2013). Happiness is greater in natural environments. Global Environmental Change, 23, 992–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.010.
Marselle, M. R., Irvine, K. N., & Warber, S. L. (2013). Walking for well-being: Are group walks in certain types of natural environments better for well-being than group walks in urban environments? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10, 5603–5628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10115603.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.
Michalos, A. C., Creech, H., McDonald, C., & Kahlke, P. M. H. (2011). Knowledge, attitudes and behaviours. Concerning education for sustainable development: Two exploratory studies. Social Indicators Research, 100(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-010-9620-9.
National Science Board (2006). Science and Engineering Indicators 2006. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/
Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: A new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale: Linking individuals’ connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41, 715–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748.
Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: Exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7.
O’Connell, T. S., Potter, T. G., & Curthoys, L. P. (2005). A call for sustainability education in post-secondary outdoor recreation programs. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370510573159.
Obery, A., & Bangert, A. (2017). Exploring the influence of nature relatedness and perceived science knowledge on proenvironmental behavior. Education Sciences, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010017.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2017a). PISA 2015 results (volume III): Students’ well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2017b). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Pan, Y. T., Yang, K. K., Hong, Z. R., & Lin, H. S. (2018). The effect of interest and engagement in learning science on adults’ scientific competency and environmental action. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(12), em1609.
Pasanen, T. P., Ojala, A., Tyrväinen, L., & Korpela, K. M. (2018). Restoration, well-being, and everyday physical activity in indoor, built outdoor and natural outdoor settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.014.
Pollard, E. L., & Lee, P. D. (2003). Child well-being: A systematic review of the literature. Social Indicators Research, 61(1), 59–78.
Rudawska, E. (2018). The sustainable marketing concept in European SMEs: Insights from the food & drink industry. Emerald Group Publishing.
Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2008). Know thyself and become what you are: A Eudaimonic approach to psychological well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 13–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9019-0.
Sahin, E., Ertepinar, H., & Teksoz, G. (2012). University students’ behaviors pertaining to sustainability: A structural equation model with sustainability-related attributes. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(3), 459–478 http://www.ijese.net/makale/1543.
Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franěk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022105275962.
Seligman, M. E. P., Rashid, T., & Parks, A. C. (2006). Positive psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 61(8), 774–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.8.774.
Statham, J., & Chase, E. (2010). Childhood wellbeing: A brief overview. Loughborough, UK: Childhood Wellbeing Research Centre.
Sustainable Society Foundation (2017). Sustainable Society Index 2016. Retrieved September 5, 2019 from the World Wide Web: http://www.ssfindex.com/data-all-countries/
Tam, K. -P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: Similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.
Tang, K. H. D. (2018). Correlation between sustainability education and engineering students’ attitudes towards sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(3), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-08-2017-0139.
Tsai, C. Y. (2018). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students’ scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers & Education, 116, 14–27.
Tsai, C. Y., & Huang, T. C. (2018). The relationship between adult self-efficacy and scientific competencies: The moderating effect of gender. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(Suppl 1), 91–106.
Tyrväinen, L., Ojala, A., Korpela, K., Lanki, T., Tsunetsugu, Y., & Kagawa, T. (2014). The influence of urban green environments on stress relief measures: A field experiment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.12.005.
Uhlmann, K., Lin, B. B., & Ross, H. (2018). Who cares? The importance of emotional connections with nature to ensure food security and wellbeing in cities. Sustainability, 10(6), 1844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061844.
Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., & Meisalo, V. (2006). Students’ interest in biology and their out-of-school experiences. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 124–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656029.
Uitto, A., Juuti, K., Lavonen, J., Byman, R., & Meisalo, V. (2011). Secondary school students’ interests, attitudes and values concerning school science related to environmental issues in Finland. Environmental Education Research, 17(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.522703.
Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11, 201–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80184-7.
Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yao, Y., Kong, Q., & Cai, J. (2018). Investigating elementary and middle school students’ subjective well-being and mathematical performance in Shanghai. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(Suppl 1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9827-1.
Zelenski, J. M., & Nisbet, E. K. (2014). Happiness and feeling connected: The distinct role of nature relatedness. Environment and Behavior, 46(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512451901.
Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005.
Zwickle, A., Koontz, T. M., Slagle, K. M., & Bruskotter, J. T. (2014). Assessing sustainability knowledge of a student population: Developing a tool to measure knowledge in the environmental, economic and social domains. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-01-2013-0008.
Acknowledgments
The work reported here was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grants MOST 105-2511-S-110-001 -MY4. The authors also greatly appreciate the valuable suggestions of the journal reviewers and editors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. The work described has not been published previously. This manuscript was approved by all authors. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The work was reviewed by the institutional review board (IRB) developed by the Academia Sinica in Taiwan.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 15 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, HH., Hong, ZR., Lin, Hs. et al. The relationships among adult sustainability attitudes, psychological well-being, nature relatedness, and interest in scientific issues. Curr Psychol 41, 1788–1799 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00708-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00708-1