Skip to main content
Log in

Moving with the in-crowd: Cooperation and interpersonal entrainment in in- vs. out- groups

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interpersonal entrainment or moving together in time, has been shown to cultivate pro-social behaviours amongst those who take part. Converging evidence suggests that its pro-social effects may be intertwined with how we classify ourselves and our co-actor in group terms. However, it is not currently clear if a well-established collective identity, such as national identities, influences entrainment’s effects on our actual behaviours, such as cooperation. The current studies tested whether greater cooperation was seen following synchronous versus asynchronous movements when people were moving with somebody of the same vs. a different nationality. As expected, results showed greater cooperation following synchronous vs asynchronous movements amongst people of different socio-cultural backgrounds, but not amongst those with a common socio-cultural background. Potential explanations for these results are explored, suggesting that entrainment and its social effects may be modulated by our group identities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmed, A. M. (2007). Group identity, social distance and intergroup bias. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allsop, J. S., Vaitkus, T., Marie, D., & Miles, L. K. (2016). Coordination and collective performance: Cooperative goals boost interpersonal synchrony and task outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7.

  • Anshell, A., & Kipper, D. A. (1988). The influence of group singing on trust and cooperation. Journal of Music Therapy, 25(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmt/25.3.145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton-James, C., Van Baaren, R. B., Chartrand, T. L., Decety, J., & Karremans, J. (2007). Mimicry and me: The impact of mimicry on self-construal. Social Cognition, 25(4), 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550609355718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batschelet, E. (1981). Circular statistics in biology (Vol. 371). London: Academic press, New York.

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirelli, L. (2018). How interpersonal synchrony facilitates early prosocial behaviour. Current opion in Psychology, 20, 35–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cirelli, L.K., Wan, S.J., & Trainor, L.J. (2014a). Fourteen-month-old infants use interpersonal synchrony as a cue to direct helpfulness. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 19, 369(1658). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0400.

  • Cirelli, L. K., Einarson, K. M., & Trainor, L. J. (2014b). Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants. Developmental Science, 17(6), 1003–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, L., Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2016). How moving together brings us together: When coordinated rhythmic movement affects cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01983.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, L., Atherton, G., Wilson, A. D. & Golonka, S. (2017). Imagined Steps: Mental Simulation of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements Effects on social affiliation. Frontiers in Psychology, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01798, Imagined Steps: Mental Simulation of Coordinated Rhythmic Movements Effects on Pro-sociality.

  • De Cremer, D., & Stouten, J. (2003). When do people find cooperation most justified?: The effect of trust and self-other merging in social dilemmas. Social Justice Research, 16, 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022974027023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1965). The elementary forms of religious life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, B. (2007). Dancing in the streets: A history of collective joy. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., Bernhard, H., & Rockenbach, B. (2008). Egalitarianism in young children. Nature, 454, 1079–1083. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (2006). From biological rhythms to social rhythms: Physiological precursors of mother-infant synchrony. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 175–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2012). The impact of social ties on group interactions: Evidence from minimal groups and randomly assigned real groups. American Economic Journal Microeconomics, 4(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.4.1.101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, A., Choma, B., & Russo, F. A. (2017). Movement synchrony influences intergroup relations in a minimal groups paradigm. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(4), 231–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, E. H., & Bryant, G. A. (2003). Music and dance as a coalition signalling system. Human Nature, 14(1), 21–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1015-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It's all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasp Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.9). Computer software. https://jasp-stats.org/

  • Keller, P. E., Novembre, G., & Hove, M. J. (2014). Rhythm in joint action: Psychological and neurophysiological mechanisms for real-time interpersonal coordination. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 369(1658), 20130394.

  • Kelso, S. J. A. (1995). Dynamic Patterns: The Self Organisation of brain and behaviour. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Kleiner, M., Brainard, D., Pelli, D. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?, Perception 36 ECVP Abstract Supplement.

  • Kokal, I., Engel, A., Kirschner, S., & Keysers, C. (2011). Synchronized drumming enhances activity in the caudate and facilitates pro-social commitment — If the rhythm comes easily. PLoS One, 6(11), e27272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed-motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 183–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, M. H., & McPartland, T. S. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes. American Sociological Review, 19(1), 68–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakens, D. (2010). Movement synchrony and perceived entitativity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 701–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakens, D., & Stel, M. (2011). If they move in sync, they must feel in sync: Movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition, 29(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2011.29.1.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeish, K. N., & Oxoby, R. J. (2011). Social interactions and the salience of social identity. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2010.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, W. H. (1997). Keeping together in time. Harvard University Press.

  • Merker, B. (2000). Synchronous chorusing and human origins (pp. 315–327). In Wallin, N. L., Merker, B., & Brown, S. (eds.) (2000). The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Miles, L. K., Lumsden, J., Richardson, M. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Do birds of a feather move together? Group membership and behavioural synchrony. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 495–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2641-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001). Changing interracial evaluations and behaviour: The effects of a common group identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 4, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/136843020100400400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddish, P., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2013). Let’s dance together: Synchrony, shared intentionality and cooperation. PLoS One, 8(8), e71182. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071182.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reddish, P., Bulbulia, J., & Fischer, R. (2014). Does synchrony promote generalized Prosociality? Religion, Brain & Behaviour., 4(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.764545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repp, B. H., & Su, Y. H. (2013). Sensorimotor synchronization: A review of recent research (2006–2012). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(3), 403–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sebanz, N., Bekkering, H., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., Billig, M. G., Bundy, R. P., & Flament, C. (1971). Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2), 149–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunçgenç, B., & Cohen, E. (2016). Movement synchrony forges social bonds across group divides. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01737.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 693–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicaria, I. M., & Dickens, L. (2016). Meta-analyses of the intra- and interpersonal outcomes of interpersonal coordination. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A.D., Collins, D.R., & Bingham, G.P. (2005a) a. Human movement coordination implicates relative direction as the information for relative phase. Experimental Brain Research, 165(3), 351-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2301-2.

  • Wilson, A.D., Collins, D.R., & Bingham, G.P. (2005b) b. Perceptual coupling in rhythmic movement coordination: Stable perception leads to stable action. Experimental Brain Research, 164(4), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2272-3.

  • Wiltermuth, S., & Heath, C. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02253.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Cross.

Ethics declarations

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest. This work received ethical approval form the relevant ethics committees, and all participants gave their full informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cross, L., Turgeon, M. & Atherton, G. Moving with the in-crowd: Cooperation and interpersonal entrainment in in- vs. out- groups. Curr Psychol 40, 3393–3400 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00283-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00283-0

Keywords

Navigation