Skip to main content
Log in

The PANAS-C: A cross-cultural examination among South African adolescents

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The presence of positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA) is important to adolescent developmental trajectories and their well-being. While the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule for Children (PANAS-S) has been widely implemented to measure affect among adolescents, measurement equivalence of the scale has rarely been addressed. This study investigated measurement equivalence of the PANAS-C across gender and ethnicity (Black and White) among a sample of South African adolescents. It also examined group differences in PA and NA between males and females, and between the two ethnic groups. Data was available for 1062 adolescents with a mean age of 15.9 years. Results from a uniform differential item analysis suggested that the items on both the PA and NA subscales function largely similarly across gender and ethnicity. Using Bayesian analyses to investigate group differences in PA and NA, boys scored higher on positive affect, and girls higher on negative affect. There were no differences in either PA or NA among Black and White adolescents. The significance and implications of the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, B. G., Van de Vijver, F. J., & De Bruin, G. P. (2012). Identity in South Africa: Examining self-descriptions across ethnic groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36(3), 377–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, N. P., Lonigan, C. J., & Phillips, B. M. (2015). Examining the factor structure and structural invariance of the PANAS across children, adolescents, and young adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(6), 616–625.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Andraszewicz, S., Scheibehenne, B., Rieskamp, R., Grasman, R., Verhagen, J., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2015). An introduction to Bayesian hypothesis testing for management research. Journal of Management, 41, 521–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M. F., & Weems, C. F. (2006). Do anxiety and depression cluster into distinct groups? A test of tripartite model predictions in a community sample of youth. Depression and Anxiety, 23, 453–460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. M. (2015). Gender and emotion expression: A developmental contextual perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 14e21–14e21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914544408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin, T. M., & Aldao, A. (2013). Gender differences in emotion expression in children: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 139(4), 735–765.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F. F., Bai, L., Lee, J. M., & Jing, Y. (2016). Culture and the structure of affect: A bifactor modeling approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 1801–1824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, J. C., & Howe, K. L. (2014). Future directions for a more multiculturally competent (and humble) positive psychology. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism and positive psychology (pp. 253–266). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Tambasco, G., Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., & Joiner, T. E. (2017). Measuring positive affect, negative affect, and physiological hyperarousal among Italian youth: Translations of the PANAS-C and PH-C. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 373–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das-Munshi, J., Lund, C., Mathews, C., Clark, C., Rothon, C., & Stansfeld, S. (2016). Mental health inequalities in adolescents growing up in post-apartheid South Africa: Cross-sectional survey, SHaW study. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154478.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • De Fruyt, F., & Wille, B. (2013). Cross-cultural issues in personality assessment. In Handbook of personality at work (pp. 333–355). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kadt, J., Norris, S. A., Fleisch, B., Richter, L., & Alvanides, S. (2014). Children’s daily travel to school in Johannesburg-Soweto, South Africa: Geography and school choice in the birth to twenty cohort study. Children’s Geographies, 12, 170–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Tay, L., & Myers, D. G. (2011). The religion paradox: If religion makes people happy, why are so many dropping out? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1278–1290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. (2016). How Bayes factors change scientific practice. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, L., & Louw, L. (2000). Culture and self in South Africa: Individualism/collectivism predictions. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 210–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebusitani, C., Smith, A., Bernstein, A., Chorpita, B. F., Higa-McMillan, C., & Nakamura, B. (2011). A bifactor model of negative affectivity: Fear and distress components among younger and older youth. Psychological Assessment, 23, 679–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, L. M., Ong, A. D., & Lopez, S. J. (2007). Hope measurement in Mexican American youth. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 29, 225–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2, 300–319.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, R., Diener, E., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 427–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinha, I. C., Pereira, C. R., & Esteves, F. G. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis and temporal invariance of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(4), 671–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., Dunson, D. B., Vehtari, A., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, L. M., Chamorrow-Premuzik, T., Roy, M., & Devroop, K. (2012). The relationship between affect, uses of music and music preferences in a sample of south African adolescents. Psychology of Music, 40(2), 164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, K. E. (2012). The neglected role of positive emotion in adolescent psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 467–481.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, J. (2015). Bayesian methods: A social and behavioral sciences approach (3rd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Baya, D., Mendoza, R., Paino, S., & Gillham, J. E. (2017). A two-year longitudinal study of gender differences in responses to positive affect and depressive symptoms during middle adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 56, 11–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. (2014). Essentials of statistics for the behavioral sciences (8th ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. K., & Watson, D. (2007). Assessing positive and negative affect via self-report. In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment (pp. 171–183). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Medical Care, 44(11, Suppl 3), S78–S94 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245454.12228.8f.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Guse, T., Vescovelli, F., & Croxford, S. A. (2017). Subjective well-being and gratitude among South African adolescents: Exploring gender and cultural differences. Youth & Society, (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X17697237.

  • Hankin, B. L., Abramson, L., Moffitt, T., Silva, P., McGee, R., & Angell, K. (1998). Development of depression from preadolescence to young adulthood: Emerging gender differences in a 10-year longitudinal study. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107, 128–140.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoijtink, H., Klugkist, I., & Boelen, P. (2008). Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09612-4.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. A., & Kendall, P. C. (2009). Psychometric properties of the positive and negative affect scale for children (PANAS-C) in children with anxiety disorders. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 40, 343–352.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshanloo, M., & Bakhshi, A. (2016). The factor structure and measurement invariance of positive and negative affect. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 32, 265–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanović, V., & Gavrilov-Jerković, V. (2016). The structure of adolescent affective well-being: The case of the PANAS among Serbian adolescents. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(5), 2097–2117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiernan, G., Laurent, J., Joiner Jr., T. E., Catanzaro, S. J., & MacLachlan, M. (2001). Cross-cultural examination of the tripartite model with children: Data from the Barretstown studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77(2), 359–379.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim-Prieto, C., & Eid, M. (2004). Norms for experiencing emotions in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(3), 241–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruschke, J. K. (2010). Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial introduction with R and BUGS. Burlington: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, B. C., & Kwantes, C. T. (2014). Testing predictive models of positive and negative affect with psychosocial, acculturation, and coping variables in a multiethnic undergraduate sample. Springer Plus, 3(1), 119.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppens, P., Tuerlinckx, F., Yik, M., Koval, P., Coosemans, J., Zeng, K. J., & Russell, J. A. (2016). The relation between valence and arousal in subjective experience varies with personality and culture. Journal of Personality, 85(4), 530–542.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., Osborne, L., & Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: Scale development and preliminary validation. Psychologist Assessment, 11, 326–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2013). Bayesian modeling for cognitive science: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Little, T. D., & Preacher, K. J. (2011). Methodological issues in using structural equation models for testing differential item functioning. In E. Davidov, P. Schmidt, & J. Billiet (Eds.), Cross-cultural analysis: Methods and applications (pp. 55–84). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2007). A user's guide to WINSTEPS-MINISTEP: Rasch-model computer programs. Chicago: winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linacre, J. M. (2015). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, J. H., Rumburg, T. M., & Jaser, S. S. (2015). Staying positive: Positive affect as a predictor of resilience in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 40(9), 968–977.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E., & Diener, E. (2015). Personality and subjective well-being: Current issues and controversies. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, M. L. Cooper, & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 577–599). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsman, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2016). Bayesian benefits with JASP. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(5), 545–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. (2007). Culture, context, and behavior. Journal of Personality, 75(6), 1285–1320.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., & Fisher, R. (2010). Testing measurement invariance across groups: Applications in cross-cultural research. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 111–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moneta, G. B., Schneider, B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). A longitudinal study of the self-concepts and experiential components of self-worth and affect across adolescence. In M. Csikszentmihalyi (Ed.), Applications of flow in human development and education (pp. 407–435). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). BayesFactor 0.9. 11-1 (with contributions from Tahira Jamil). Comprehensive R Archive Network.

  • Mroczek, D. K., & Kolarz, C. M. (1998). The effect of age on positive and negative affect: A developmental perspective on happiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1333–1349.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016). Editor’s introduction to the special issue on “Bayes factors for testing hypotheses in psychological research: Practical relevance and new developments”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 72, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2013). BSEM measurement invariance analysis. Mplus Web Notes: No. 17. www.statmodel.com.

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1994). An interactive model for the emergence of gender differences in depression in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 4(4), 519–534.

  • Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Rusting, C. (2003). Gender differences in well-being. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Foundations of hedonic psychology: Scientific perspectives on enjoyment and suffering (pp. 330–352). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño-Sierra, J., Santarén-Rosell, M., Albéniz, A. P. D., & Fonseca-Pedrero, E. (2015). Dimensional structure of the Spanish version of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS) in adolescents and young adults. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), e1–e9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1995 (pp. 111–196). Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reschly, A. L., Huebner, E. S., Appleton, J. J., & Antaramian, S. (2008). Engagement as flourishing: The contribution of affect and coping to adolescents’ engagement at school and with learning. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, S. M., Leen-Feldner, E. W., Blumenthal, H., Lewis, S. F., & Feldner, M. T. (2015). Risk for suicide among treatment seeking adolescents: The role of positive and negative affect intensity. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(2), 100–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roothman, B., Kirsten, D. K., & Wissing, M. P. (2003). Gender differences in aspects of psychological well-being. South Africa Journal of Psychology, 33(4), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t-tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 225–237.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Alvarez, N., Extremera, N., & Fernández-Berrocal, P. (2015). Maintaining life satisfaction in adolescence: Affective mediators of the influence of perceived emotional intelligence on overall life satisfaction judgments in a two-year longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1892.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmack, U., Oishi, S., & Diener, E. (2002). Cultural influences on the relation between pleasant emotions and unpleasant emotions: Asian dialectic philosophies or individualism-collectivism? Cognition & Emotion, 16(6), 705–719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer-Hudkins, E., Suldo, S., Loker, T., & March, A. (2010). How adolescents’ mental health predicts their physical health: Unique contributions of indicators of subjective well-being and psychopathology. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 5(3), 203–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheu, H. B. (2014). Affective well-being viewed through a lens of race and ethnicity. In J. T. Pedrotti & L. M. Edwards (Eds.), Perspectives on the intersection of multiculturalism and positive psychology, Cross-cultural advancements in positive psychology 7 (pp. 61–74). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics South Africa. (2012). Census 2011: Census in brief. Pretoria: Statistics South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevanovic, D., Laurent, J., & Lakic, A. (2013). Measuring positive and negative affect and physiological hyperarousal among Serbian youth. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(1), 107–117.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents’ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38, 167–185.

  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

  • Terraciano, A., McCrae, R. R., & Costa Jr., P. T. (2003). Factorial and construct validity of the Italian positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theron, L. C., & Liebenberg, L. (2015). Understanding cultural contexts and their relationship to resilience processes. In L. C. Theron, L. Liebenberg, & M. Ungar (Eds.), Youth resilience and culture (pp. 23–36). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, J. L., Knutson, B., & Fung, H. H. (2006). Cultural variation in affect valuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 288–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, P. J., Zajac, I. T., & Venning, A. J. (2009). The structure of anxiety and depression in a normative sample of younger and older Australian adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 717–726.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Schoot, R., Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2012.686740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 4–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronese, G., & Pepe, A. (2017). Positive and negative affect in children living in refugee camps: Assessing the psychometric proprieties and factorial invariance of the PANAS-C in the Gaza strip. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 40(1), 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veronese, G., Castiglioni, M., Barola, G., & Said, M. (2012). Living in the shadow of occupation: Life satisfaction and positive emotion as protective factors in a group of Palestinian school children. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 225–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, L., & Laher, S. (2009). The relationship between individualism/collectivism and the five factor model of personality: An exploratory study. Psychology in Society, 37, 39–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E. J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagenmakers, E. J., Love, J., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Dropmann, D., Boutin, B., Meerhoff, F., Knight, P., Raj, A., van Kesteren, E. J., van Doorn, J., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., Etz, A., Matzke, D., de Jong, T., van den Bergh, D., Sarafoglou, A., Steingroever, H., Derks, K., Rouder, J. N., & Morey, R. D. (2018). Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP. Psychonomic Bullutin Review, 25, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D. (1988). The vicissitudes of mood measurement: Effects of varying descriptors, time frames, and response formats on measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 128–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, D., Chiu, C. Y., Diener, E., & Oishi, S. (2009). What constitutes a good life? Cultural differences in the role of positive and negative affect in subjective well-eing. Journal of Personality, 77(4), 1167–1196.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tharina Guse.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Research Involving Human Participants

Ethical approval to conduct the study has been obtained in accordance with national standards and guidelines on ethics in research with human participants.

Informed Consent

Parents or legal guardians provided informed consent to participate in the study, while the participants provided assent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guse, T., van Zyl, C.J.J. The PANAS-C: A cross-cultural examination among South African adolescents. Curr Psychol 40, 523–533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9965-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-9965-9

Keywords

Navigation