Abstract
To date, relatively few studies have begun to explore adolescents’ sexual self-disclosure in cyberspace. Rare research has taken a close look at differences in adolescents’ sexual self-disclosure occurring in real life and cyberspace. The social penetration model suggests that an individual’s level of sexual disclosure should be in accordance with relationship intimacy in real life. The current study investigated whether the effects of relationship intimacy on adolescents’ willingness to disclose sexual history differ in terms of sex and communication environment (real life vs. cyberspace). A total of 419 Taiwanese adolescents completed a survey about their willingness to communicate on different sexual topics in the contexts of varying levels of relationship intimacy. The results showed that in real life both male and female adolescents showed a parallel relationship between willingness to engage in sexual disclosure and relationship intimacy, supporting predictions according to the social penetration model. However, in cyberspace, male adolescents exhibited a greater willingness to communicate, regardless of degree of relationship intimacy, whereas females revealed a U-shape trend regarding the effect of relationship intimacy on willingness to communicate. These findings indicate that sexual disclosure on the part of adolescents in cyberspace departs from the perspective of the social penetration model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I., & Taylor, D. A. (1973). Social penetration and the development of interpersonal relationship. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Buhrke, R., & Fuqua, D. (1987). Sex differences in same-and cross-sex supportive relationships. Sex Roles, 17, 339–352.
Caldwell, M., & Peplau, L. (1982). Sex differences in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 8, 721–732.
Cameron, K. A., Salazar, L. F., Bernhardt, J. M., & Burgress-Whitman, N. (2005). Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: results from online focus group. Journal of Adolescence, 28, 535–540.
Chiou, W.-B. (2007). Adolescents’ reply intent for sexual disclosure in cyberspace: gender differences and effects of anonymity and topic intimacy. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 725–728.
Chiou, W.-B., & Wan, C.-S. (2006). Sexual self-disclosure in cyberspace among Taiwanese adolescents: gender differences and the interplay of cyberspace and real life. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 46–53.
Cohen, J. (1992). Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.
Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 181–187.
Cooper, A. (2002). Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians. New York: Routledge.
Cooper, A., & Griffin-Shelley, E. (2002). The Internet: the next sexual revolution. In A. Cooper (Ed.), Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians (pp. 1–15). New York: Routledge.
Cooper, A., Scherer, C., Boies, S. C., & Gordon, B. (1999). Sexuality on the Internet: online sexual behavior from sexual exploration to pathological expression. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 30, 154–164.
Cooper, A., Delmonico, D., & Burg, R. (2000). Cyber sex users and abusers: new findings and implications. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Preventions, 7, 1–25.
Cooper, A., Griffin-Shelley, E., Delmonico, D. L., & Mathy, R. (2001). Online sexual problems: assessment and predictive variables. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: The Journal of Treatment and Preventions, 8, 267–285.
Cubbin, C., Santelli, J., Brindis, C. D., & Braveman, P. (2005). Neighborhood context and sexual behaviors among adolescents: findings from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 37, 125–134.
Davidson, L., & Duberman, L. (1982). Friendship: communication and interactional patterns in same-sex dyads. Sex Roles, 8, 809–822.
Derlega, V. J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., & Margulis, S. T. (1993). Self-disclosure. Newbury Park: Sage.
Diener, E. (1979). Deindividuation: the absent of self-awareness and self-regulation on group numbers. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), The psychology of group influence (pp. 209–242). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Dindia, K., & Allen, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-disclosure: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 106–124.
Dolgin, K. G., & Minowa, N. (1997). Gender differences in self-presentation: a comparison of the roles of flatteringness and intimacy in self-disclosure to friends. Sex Roles, 36, 371–380.
Dolgin, K. G., Meyer, L., & Schwartz, J. (1991). Effects of gender, target’s gender, topic, and self-esteem on disclosure to best and midling friends. Sex Roles, 25, 311–330.
Ellison, P., Govern, J., Petri, H., & Figler, M. (1995). Anonymity and aggressive driving behavior: a field study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 265–272.
Festinger, L., Pepitone, A., & Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382–389.
Fisher, T. D. (1986). Parent-child communication about sex and young adolescents’ sexual knowledge and attitudes. Adolescence, 21, 517–528.
Frankowski, B. L. (2004). Sexual orientation and adolescents. Pediatrics, 113, 1827–1832.
Gowen, L. K., Feldman, S. S., Diaz, R., & Yisrael, D. S. (2004). A comparison of the sexual behaviors and attitudes of adolescent girls with older vs. similar-aged boyfriends. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 167–176.
Harrison, T. W. (2003). Adolescent homosexuality and concerns regarding disclosure. Journal of School Health, 73, 107–112.
Hsueh, I. C. (2001). Taiwan BBS users’ self-disclosure, inclination of self-presentation in plan file, and Perception of the nickname [in Chinese]. Unpublished mater’s thesis, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
Jourard, S. M. (1971). Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. New York: Wiley.
Liau, L., Khoo, A., & Ang, P. (2008). Parental awareness and monitoring of adolescent Internet use. Current Psychology, 27, 217–233.
Lin, C. H., & Yeh, C. H. (1999). Online sexuality report [in Chinese]. Taipei: Explore.
Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to Internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49, 221–237.
Pearce, W. B., & Sharp, S. M. (1973). Self-disclosing communication. Journal of Communication, 23, 409–425.
Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (1998). Deindividuation and antinormative behavior: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 238–259.
Rehm, J., Steinleitner, M., & Lilli, W. (1987). Wearing uniforms and aggression: a field experiment. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 357–360.
Reis, H., Senchak, M., & Solomon, B. (1985). Sex differences in the intimacy of social interaction: further examination of potential explanations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1204–1217.
Reisman, J. M. (1990). Intimacy in same-sex friendship. Sex Roles, 23, 65–80.
Rostosky, S. S., Wilcox, B. L., Wright, M. L. C., & Randall, B. A. (2004). The impact of religiosity on adolescent sexual behavior: a review of the evidence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 677–697.
Schneider, J. P. (2000). A qualitative study of cybersex participants: gender differences, recovery issues, and implications for therapists. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7, 249–278.
Snell, W. E., Jr., Miller, R., & Belk, S. (1988). Development of the emotional self disclosure scale. Sex Roles, 18, 58–73.
Somers, C. L., & Gleason, J. H. (2001). Does source of sex education predict adolescents’ sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behavior? Education, 121, 674–681.
Song, E. Y., Pruitt, B. E., McNamara, J., & Colwell, B. (2000). The Journal of Scholl Health, 70, 413–416.
Thurstone, L. L. (1925). A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 16, 433–451.
Wallace, P. M. (2001). The psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wan, C.-S., Chung, S.-H., & Chiou, W.-B. (2009). Contingent impression management in sexual disclosure by older adolescents corresponding in cyberspace: the role of gender dyads. Social Behavior and Personality, 37, 1023–1032.
Weiser, E. (2000). Gender differences in Internet use patterns and Internet application preferences: a two-sample comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3, 167–177.
Werner-Wilson, R. J. (1998). Gender differences in adolescent sexual attitudes: the influence of individual and family factors. Adolescence, 33, 519–531.
Yang, M. C., & Huang, K. K. (1980). The model of self-disclosure and its related variables [in Chinese]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 26, 51–70.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1969). The human choice: individuation, reason and order, versus deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1975). Transforming experimental research into advocacy for social change. In M. Deutsch & H. A. Hornstein (Eds.), Applying social psychology: Implications for research, practice and training (pp. 33–66). Hillsdale: Lawrence.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank the National Science Council of the Republic of China for financially supporting this research (Project No. NSC 92-2815-C-328-006-S). We also thank Wang Siang for data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, ML., Yang, CC. & Chiou, WB. Differences in Engaging in Sexual Disclosure Between Real Life and Cyberspace Among Adolescents: Social Penetration Model Revisited. Curr Psychol 29, 144–154 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9078-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-010-9078-6