Abstract
We studied visual-perceptual abilities of individuals with different levels of education (including adult illiterates) in Brazil (N = 136) and in Estonia (N = 560) with person-oriented methods of data analysis. Our aim was to discover whether dominant type of word meaning structure (WMS) can define the “Great Divide”, the single breaking point that universally defines certain direction of subsequent to it cultural evolution. We particularly focused on the everyday concept-logical concept shift that takes place in the formal education system. We found that logical concepts were rarely available for illiterates; availability of logical conceptual thought increases together with the level of education. Most illiterates were able to find figures of concrete objects from complex overlapping and embedded contour figures but none of them could find all abstract figures from the same complex figures. Also none of the illiterates could perform beyond chance level in both mental rotation tasks together. Ability to perform correctly on all visual-spatial tasks increased with the increase in logical concepts and with the increasing level of education. The distribution of respondents according to the WMS level, level of education, and performance on the visual-spatial tasks indicated that individuals are developmentally heterogeneous: achievement of the tertiary level of education and logical conceptual thinking mechanisms does not guarantee high level performance on the visual-spatial tasks. The results are in agreement with the theory of unilineal hierarchic cultural evolution. Individual psychic development and cultural evolution can be both understood in terms of the WMS development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
“Rarely if ever” would deserve a longer theoretical discussion. Shortly, there are different possibilities why individuals with no formal education still occasionally can give answers that must be coded as logical. First, individuals may have had experiences outside formal education system that supported development of some logical concepts – as there is no biological reason why this type of concepts did not develop in this group. Second, the answers can be essentially pseudoconcepts: for instance just verbal superficial associations with no hierarchical language structure behind the answer. And third, some superficially logical concept type answers can be based on everyday experiences. For instance to say that “bed” and “chair” go together because they are “furniture” may come from visiting shops that are called furniture (shops). Thus, in that case, the answer could emerge from the reasoning – “bed and chair go together because both are sold at the shop called furniture”. That justification would be an example of everyday conceptual thought. Our resources did not allow to conduct a study where all such relevant issues could have been discussed with the participants in sufficient details.
The probability to answer correctly 3 or more times out of four by chance would be 0.108 and 0.313 for the MRCC and MRHT, respectively.
References
Alegret, M., Boada-Rovira, M., Vinyes-Junque, G., Valero, S., Espinosa, A., Hernandez, I., et al. (2009). Detection of visuoperceptual deficits in preclinical and mild Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(7), 860–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803390802595568.
Alegret, M., Espinosa, A., Valero, S., Vinyes-Junque, G., Ruiz, A., Hernandez, I., et al. (2013). Cut-off scores of a brief neuropsychological battery (NBACE) for Spanish individual adults older than 44 years old. PLoS One, 8(10), e76436. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076436.
Barnhart, R. K. (Ed.). (1988). Chambers dictionary of etymology. New York: H. W. Wilson Company.
Bergman, L. R., & El-Khouri, B. M. (2002). SLEIPNER: A statistical package for pattern-oriented analyses. Version 2.1. Stockholm: Stockholm University, Department of Psychology.
Bernardo, A. B. I. (1998). Literacy and the mind. The contexts and cognitive consequences of literacy practice. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.
Bialystok, E. (1992). Attentional control in children's metalinguistic performance and measures of field independence. Developmental Psychology, 28(4), 654–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.28.4.654.
Bisiach, E., Capitani, E., Nichelli, P., & Spinnler, H. (1976). Recognition of overlapping patterns and focal hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia, 14, 375–379.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. A once and future discipline. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Cole, M., & Cole, J. (2006). Rethinking the Goody myth. In D. R. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society (pp. 305–324). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cornu, V., Schiltz, C., Martin, R., & Hornung, C. (2018). Visuo-spatial abilities are key for young children's verbal number skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 604–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.006.
Della Sala, S., Laiacona, M., Trivelli, C., & Spinnler, A. (1995). Poppelreuter-Ghent's overlapping figures test: Its sensitivity to age, and its clinical use. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10(6), 511–534.
Ghent, L. (1956). Perception of overlapping and embedded figures by children of different ages. American Journal of Psychology, 69(4), 575–587.
Goody, J. (1973). Evolution and communication: The domestication of the savage mind. British Journal of Sociology, 24(1), 1–12.
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. (1986). The logic of writing and the organization of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(3), 304–345.
Gottschaldt, K. (1926). Über den einfluss der erfahrung auf die wahrenehmung von figuren. [about the influence of experience on the perception of figures]. Psychologische Forschung, 8(1), 261–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02411523.
Hald, A. (2003). A history of probability and statistics and their applications before 1750. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Johnsen, S. K. (2017). Test of nonverbal intelligence: A language-free measure of cognitive ability. In R. S. McCallum (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment. Second Edition (pp. 185–206). Cham: Springer.
Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2005). The structure of human intelligence: It is verbal, perceptual, and image rotation (VPR), not fluid and crystallized. Intelligence, 33, 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2004.12.002.
Lienert, G. A., & Krauth, J. (1975). Configural frequency analysis as a statistical tool for defining types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 35, 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447503500201.
Luria, A. R. (1947). Travmaticheskaja afasia. Klinika, semiotika i vosstanovitel'naya terapiya. (traumatic aphasia. Clinic, semiotics, and rehabilitation.). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Meditsinskikh Nauk SSSR.
Luria, A. R. (1969). Vyshije korkovyje funktsii tsheloveka i ikh narushenija pri lokal'nykh porazenijakh mozga. (higher cortical functions in man and their disturbances in local brain lesions.) (2nd ed.). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
Luria, A. R. (1974). Ob istoricheskom razvitii poznavatel'nykh processov. Eksperimental'no-psikhologicheskoje issledovanije. Moscow: Nauka.
Luria, A. R. (1979). Jazyk i soznanije. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
McCallum, R. S. (2017a). Context for nonverbal assessment of intelligence and related abilities. In R. S. McCallum (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment. Second Edition (pp. 3–19). Cham: Springer.
McCallum, R. S. (Ed.). (2017b). Handbook of nonverbal assessment. Second Edition. Cham: Springer.
Meneghetti, C., Toffalini, E., Carretti, B., & Lanfranchi, S. (2018). Mental rotation ability and everyday-life spatial activities in individuals with down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 72, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2017.10.019.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement, 2(4), 201–218.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2007). Psychological methodology will change profoundly due to the necessity to focus on intra-individual variation: Commentary on Toomela. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 35–40.
Molenaar, P. C. M. (2008). Consequences of the ergodic theorems for classical test theory, factor analysis, and the analysis of developmental processes. In S. M. Hofer & D. F. Alwin (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive aging (pp. 90–104). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review, 47(3), 257–281.
Olson, D. R. (1986). The cognitive consequences of literacy. Canadian Psychology, 27(2), 109–121.
Olson, D. R. (2006). The documentary tradition in mind and society. In D. R. Olson & M. Cole (Eds.), Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society. Implications of the work of Jack Goody (pp. 289–304). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Örnkloo, H., & Von Hofsten, C. (2007). Fitting objects into holes: On the development of spatial cognition skills. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 404–416.
Paivio, A. (1990). Mental representations. A dual coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pillon, B., Dubois, B., Bonnet, A.-M., Esteguy, M., Guimaraes, J., Vigouret, J.-M., et al. (1989). Cognitive slowing in Parkinson's disease fails to respond to levodopa treatment: The 15-objects test. Neurology, 39, 762–768. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.39.6.762.
Poppelreuter, W. (1917). Die psychischen Schadigungen durch kopfschus im kriege 1914/16 mit besonderer berucksichtigung der pathopsychologischen, padagogischen, gewerblichen und sozialen beziehungen. Band I. Leipzig, Leopold Voss.
Rutherford, T., Karamarkovich, S. M., & Lee, D. S. (2018). Is the spatial/math connection unique? Associations between mental rotation and elementary mathematics and English achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 62, 180–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2018.01.014.
Saussure, D. F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
Scribner, S., & Cole, M. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sells, R., & Larner, A. J. (2011). The Poppelreuter figure visual perceptual function test for dementia diagnosis. Progress in Neurology and Psychiatry, 15(2), 17–21.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703.
Stigler, S. M. (1986). The history of statistics. The measurement uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Toomela, A. (1996a). How culture transforms mind: A process of internalization. Culture and Psychology, 2(3), 285–305.
Toomela, A. (1996b). What characterizes language that can be internalized: A reply to Tomasello. Culture and Psychology, 2(3), 319–322.
Toomela, A. (2003). Relationships between personality structure, structure of word meaning, and cognitive ability: A study of cultural mechanisms of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.723.
Toomela, A. (2007a). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9004-0.
Toomela, A. (2007b). History of methodology in psychology: Starting point, not the goal. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9005-z.
Toomela, A. (2008a). Kurt Lewin's contribution to the methodology of psychology: From past to future skipping the present. In J. Clegg (Ed.), The observation of human systems. Lessons from the history of anti-Reductionistic empirical psychology (pp. 101–116). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Toomela, A. (2008b). Variables in psychology: A critique of quantitative psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(3), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9059-6.
Toomela, A. (2010a). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single-case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. T. Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Yearbook of idiographic science, volume 2/2009 (pp. 13–33). Rome: Firera & Liuzzo Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2010b). Modern mainstream psychology is the best? Noncumulative, historically blind, fragmented, atheoretical. In A. Toomela & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Methodological thinking in psychology: 60 years gone astray? (pp. 1–26). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2010c). Poverty of modern mainstream psychology in autobiography. Reflections on A History of Psychology in Autobiography. Volume IX. Culture and Psychology, 16(1), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X09344892.
Toomela, A. (2010d). Quantitative methods in psychology: Inevitable and useless. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(29), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00029.
Toomela, A. (2011). Travel into a fairy land: A critique of modern qualitative and mixed methods psychologies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9152-5.
Toomela, A. (2012). Guesses on the future of cultural psychology: Past, present, and past. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 998–1033). New York: Oxford University Press.
Toomela, A. (2014a). Modern qualitative approach to psychology: Art or science? In S. Salvatore, A. Gennaro, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Multicentric identities in a globalizing world (pp. 75–82). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Toomela, A. (2014b). There can be no cultural-historical psychology without neuropsychology. And vice versa. In A. Yasnitsky, R. van der Veer, & M. Ferrari (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 315–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toomela, A. (2015). Vygotsky’s theory on the Procrustes’ bed of linear thinking: Looking for structural-systemic Theseus to save the idea of ‘social formation of mind’. Culture and Psychology, 21(3), 318–339.
Toomela, A. (2016a). Kultuur, kõne ja Minu Ise. (Culture, speech, and My Self). Tallinn: Eesti Keele Sihtasutus.
Toomela, A. (2016b). The ways of scientific anticipation: From guesses to probabilities and from there to certainty. In M. Nadin (Ed.), Anticipation across disciplines (pp. 255–273). Cham: Springer.
Toomela, A. (2016c). What are higher psychological functions? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(1), 91–121.
Toomela, A. (2017a). Minu Ise areng: Inimlapsest Inimeseks. (development of my self: From the human child to the human.). Tartu: Väike Vanker.
Toomela, A. (2017b). Neuroscience: Can it become developmental? In D. Carre, J. Valsiner, & S. Hampl (Eds.), Representing development: The social construction of models of change (pp. 107–120). London: Routledge.
Toomela, A. (2018). Thoughts on the Contextual Cognition: Another Déjà vu. In A. Ibanez & A. M. Garcia (Eds.), Contextual cognition. The sensus communis of a situated mind (pp. 85–95). Cham: Springer.
Toomela, A. (2019). Studies in the mentality of literates: Searching for the great divide at the individual level of analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development., 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09503-5.
Toomela, A., Nõmm, S., Kõnnussaar, T., & Tammik, V. (2019). Why behavioral indicators may fail to reveal mental states: Individual differences in arousal-movement pattern relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(270), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00270.
Tulviste, P. (1988). Kul'turno-istoricheskoje razvitije verbal'nogo myshlenija. Tallinn: Valgus.
Varriale, V., van der Molen, M. W., & De Pascalis, V. (2018). Mental rotation and fluid intelligence: A brain potential analysis. Intelligence, 69, 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.05.007.
von Eye, A. (1990). Introduction to configural frequency analysis. The search for types and antitypes in cross-classifications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
von Eye, A., Mair, P., & Mun, E.-Y. (2010). Advances in configural frequency analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Myshlenije i rech. Psikhologicheskije issledovanija. (thinking and speech. Psychological investigations.). Moscow: Gosudarstvennoje Social'no-ekonomicheskoje Izdatel'stvo.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1960). Lekcii po psikhologii. (originally presented as lectures in 1932). In A. N. Leontiev, A. R. Luria, & B. M. Teplova (Eds.), L. S. Vygotsky. Razvitie vyshikh psikhicheskih funkcii. Iz neopublikovannykh trudov (pp. 233–363). Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Pedagogicheskih Nauk RSFSR.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984a). Krizis semi let. (originally presented as a lecture in 1933/34). In D. B. El'konin (Ed.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii, Tom 4. Detskaja psikhologija (pp. 376–385). Pedagogika: Moscow.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1984b). Pedologija podrostka. (Originally published in 1930-1931). In D. B. El'konin (Ed.), L. S. Vygotsky. Sobranije sochinenii. Tom 4. Detskaja psikhologija (pp. 5–242). Pedagogika: Moscow.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1930). Etjudy po istorii povedenija. Obezjana. Primitiv. Rebjonok. Moscow-Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoje Izdatel'stvo.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. (1994). Tool and symbol in child development. (originally written in 1930). In R. V. D. Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Vygotsky reader (pp. 99–174). Oxford: Blackwell.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to all participants who contributed their time and effort for this study. We thank Cristina Ceciarelli and Boipeba community for help in organizing the study.
Funding
Writing of this work was supported by the Tallinn University School of Educational Sciences Grant Study of novel aspects of the state and development of speech function and by the Estonian Research Council Grant No IUT03–03 (Academic and personal development of an individual in the system of formal education) to Aaro Toomela.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
No author of this paper has any conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the national research committees and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toomela, A., Filho, D.B., Bastos, A.C.S. et al. Studies in the Mentality of Literates: 1. Conceptual Structure and Aspects of Visual Perception. Integr. psych. behav. 54, 465–493 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09511-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-019-09511-5