Abstract
This article develops an integrative theory of the mind by examining how the mind, understood as a set of skills and dispositions, depends upon four sources of mediators. Harré’s hybrid psychology is taken as a meta-theoretical starting point, but is expanded significantly by including the four sources of mediators that are the brain, the body, social practices and technological artefacts. It is argued that the mind is normative in the sense that mental processes do not simply happen, but can be done more or less well, and thus are subject to normative appraisal. The expanded hybrid psychology is meant to assist in integrating theoretical perspectives and research interests that are often thought of as incompatible, among them neuroscience, phenomenology of the body, social practice theory and technology studies. A main point of the article is that these perspectives each are necessary for an integrative approach to the human mind.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Oxford: Blackwell.
Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression: Conversation creating the unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2006). Mental life in the space of reasons. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 36, 1–16.
Brinkmann, S. (2008). Culture as practices: a pragmatist conception. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 28, 192–212.
Brinkmann, S. (2009). Psyken: Mellem synapser og samfund. [The Psyche: Between Synapses and Society]. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
Brinkmann, S. (2010). The ethical subject: accountability, authorship, and practical reason. Sats: Northern European Journal of Philosophy, 11(1), 75–89.
Brinkmann, S. (2011). Psychology as a moral science: Perspectives on normativity. New York: Springer.
Brinkmann, S., & Tanggaard, L. (2010). Toward an epistemology of the hand. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 29(3), 243–257.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action and cognitive extension. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. London: Macmillan.
Coulter, J., & Sharrock, W. (2007). Brain, mind, and human behavior in contemporary cognitive science: Critical assessments of the philosophy of psychology. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen.
Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. (Late Works of John Dewey). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self (pp. 16–49). London: Tavistock Publications.
Gillespie, A., & Zittoun, T. (2010). Using resources: conceptualizing the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture & Psychology, 16, 37–62.
Harman, G. (2009). Prince of networks: Bruno Latour and metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press.
Harré, R. (1983). Personal being. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harré, R. (1997). Forward to Aristotle: the case for a hybrid ontology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 27, 173–191.
Harré, R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. London: Sage.
Harré, R. (2002). Cognitive science: A philosophical introduction. London: Sage.
Harré, R. (2004). Staking out claim for qualitative psychology as science. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 3–14.
Harré, R., & Tissaw, M. (2005). Wittgenstein and psychology: A practical guide. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of Spirit. (First published 1807). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: Aesthetics of human understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kierkegaard, S. A. (1849). Sygdommen til Døden. [The Sickness unto Death]. (This edition 1995). Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3, 228–245.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1985). After virtue. (2nd ed. with postscript). London: Duckworth.
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. (This edition 1974). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of perception. (This edition published 2002). London: Routledge.
Putnam, H. (1999). The threefold cord: Mind, body, and world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Robinson, D. N. (1989). Aristotle’s psychology. New York: Columbia University Press.
Rose, N. (2007). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smedslund, J. (2009). The mismatch between current research methods and the nature of psychological phenomena: What researchers must learn from practitioners. Theory & Psychology, 19, 778–794.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (2007). Mediation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. V. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 178–192). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Young, I. M. (1980). Throwing like a girl: a phenomenology of feminine body comportment, motility and spatiality. Human Studies, 3, 137–156.
Zittoun, T. (2007). The role of symbolic resources in human lives. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 343–361). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Carlos Cornejo and Mauricio Cortes for helpful and challenging comments that helped improve the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brinkmann, S. Towards an Expansive Hybrid Psychology: Integrating Theories of the Mediated Mind. Integr. psych. behav. 45, 1–20 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9146-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-010-9146-3