Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patterns of union decline and growth: An organizational ecology perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich, Howard E. and Ellen R. Auster. “Even Dwarfs Started Small: Liabilities of Age and Size and Their Strategic Implications.” Research in Organizational Behavior, 8. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press, 1986, pp. 165–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, Howard E. and Pfeffer, J. “Environments of Organizations.” Annual Review of Sociology 2 (1976): 121–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amburgey, Terry L., Dawn Kelly, and William P. Barnett. “Resetting the Clock: The Dynamics of Organi-zational Change and Failure.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (March 1993): 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, David N., Elizabeth West, and Michael T. Hannan. “A Time to Grow and a Time to Die: Growth and Mortality of Credit Unions in New York City, 1914-1990.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (September 1994): 381–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Joel A. “Organizational Ecology.” In Steward R. Clegg, Cynthia Hardy, and Walter R. Nord, eds. Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications, 1996, pp. 77–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Christine Oliver.“Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality.” Administrative Sci-ence Quarterly 36 (June 1991): 187–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Institutional Embeddedness and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations.” American Soci-ological Review 57 (August 1992): 540–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boeker, Warren. “Organizational Origins: Entrepreneurial and Environmental Imprinting at the Time of Founding.” In Glenn R. Carroll, ed. Ecological Models of Organizations. Cambridge, Mass.: Ballinger, 1988, pp. 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, William Lowe, David N. Plank, and Gary Sykes. “Teachers Unions in Hard Times.” In Tom Love-less, ed. Conflicting Missions? Teachers, Unions, and Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brook-ings Institution, 2000, pp. 74–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruderl, Josef, and Rudolph Schussler. “Organizational Mortality: The Liability of Newness and Adoles-cence.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (December 1990): 530–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Peter F., Peter L. Francia, and Paul S. Herndon. “Labor at Work: Union Campaign Archives and Legislative Payoff in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Social Science Quarterly 81 (June 2000): 507–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, John F. and Terry Thomasson.“The Extent of Collective Bargaining in the Public Sector.” In Ben-jamin Aaron, Joyce Najita, and James Stems, eds. Public Sector Bargaining. Madison, Wisc: IRRA, 1988, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Glenn R. Ecological Models of Organization. Cambridge, Mass.: Balinger, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Michael T. Hannan. The Demography of Corporations and Industries. Princeton, N.J.: Prince-ton University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaison, Gary N. and Barbara Bigelow. Unions and Legitimacy. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, Bob. “The New NEA: Reinventing Teacher Unions for a New Era.” American Educator 22 (Winter 1997-98): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cibulka, James G. “The NEA and School Choice.” In Tom Loveless, ed. Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brooklyn Institution, 2000, pp. 150–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, Paul J. and Walter W. Powell. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collec-tive Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (April 1983): 147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbin, Frank and Timothy J. Dowd. “How Policy Shapes Competition: Early Railroad Foundings in Mass-achusetts.” Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (September 1997): 501–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony. Inside Bureaucracy. Prospect Heights, Ill.: Waveland Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engvall, Robert P. “Public-Sector Unionization in 1995: Or It Appears the Lion King Has Eaten Robin Hood.” Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 24 (September 1995): 255–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichman, Mark and Daniel A. Levinthal. “Honeymoon and the Liability of Adolescense: A New Perspec-tive on Duration Dependence in Social and Organizational Relationships.” Academy of Management Review 16 (July 1991): 442–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito, Jack, Lee P. Stepina, and Dennis P. Bozeman. “Explaining the Unionism Gap: Public-Private Sec-tor Differences in Preferences for Unionization.” Journal of Labor Research 17 (Summer 1986): 463–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammang, Janet A. “Effective Implementation: The Case of Comparable Worth in San Jose.” Policy Stud-ies Review 5 (May 1986): 815–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. “Unionism Comes to the Public Sector.” Journal of Economic Literature 24 (March 1986): 41–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Michael T. Hannan. “Niche Width and the Dynamics of Organizational Populations.” Amer-ican Journal of Sociology 88 (January 1983): 1116–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, Steven M. and Leland E. Stuart. “The Extent and Impact of Educational Policy Bargaining.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (April 1986): 350–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, Michael T. and John Freeman. “The Population Ecology of Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 82 (March 1977): 929–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Structural Inertia and Organizational Change.” American Sociological Review 49 (April 1984): 149–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. Disbanding Rates of National Labor Unions, 1836-1985. (Technical Report 86-6), Department of Sociology, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • . “The Ecology of Organizational Mortality: American Labor Unions, 1836-1985.” American Journal of Sociology 94 (July 1988): 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. Organizational Ecology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, Michael T. “A Model of Competitive and Institutional Process in Organizational Ecology.” (Tech-nical Report 86-13). Ithaca, N.Y.: Department of Sociology, Cornell University, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Glenn R. Carroll. Dynamics of Organizational Populations: Density, Competition, and Legit-imation. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, Heather A. and Hayagreeva Rao.“Structuring a Theory of Moral Sentiments: Institutional and Organizational Coevolution in the Early Thrift Industry.” American Journal of Sociology 102 (May 1997): 1606–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedburg, B. “How Organizations Learn and Unlearn.” In Paul C. Nystrom and William Starbuck, eds. Hand-book of Organizational Design, Vol I. New York: Oxford, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, Casey. “Public Sector Union Growth and Bargaining Laws: A Proportional Hazards Approach with Time-Varying Treatments.” In Richard Freeman and Casey Ichniowski, eds. When Public Sector Workers Unionize. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988, pp. 19–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, Larry W. and Larry J. Griffin.“Ahistoricism in Time-Series Analyses of Historical Process: Critique, Redirection, and Illustrations from U.S. Labor History.” American Sociological Review 54 (December 1989): 873–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Susan Moore and Susan M. Kardos.”Reform Bargaining and Its Promise for School Improvement.” In Tom Loveless, ed. Conflicting Missions? Teachers Unions and Educational Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution, 2000, pp. 7–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Paul. “Organize for What? The Resurgence of Labor As a Citizen Movement.” In Lowell Turner, Harry Katz, and Richard W. Hurd, eds. Rekindling the Movement: Labor's Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001, pp. 27–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Success While Others Fail: Social Movement Unionism and the Public Workplace. Ithaca, N.Y.: ILR Press, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Herbert. Time, Change, and Organizations. Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Richard C. Labor Relations in the Public Sector, 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • — and Steven W. Hays. “Labor-Management Relations and Participative Decision Making: Toward a New Paradigm.” Public Administration Review 54 (January/February 1994): 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A. “Dynamics of Dispute Resolution in the Public Sector.” In B. Aaron, J.R. Grodin, and J.L. Stern, eds. Public-Sector Bargaining. Washington, D.C.: Bureau of National Affairs, 1979, pp. 150–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosterlitz, Julie. “Busted Unions.” National Journal 29 (December 20, 1997): 2552–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Cathie M. “Bittersweet Partnerships.” Government Executive 2 (February 1996): 41–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Paul R. and Jay W. Lorsch. Organization and Environment. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legier, Joel I. “City, County, and State Government Liability for Sex-Based Wage Discrimination after County of Washington v. Gunther and AFSCME v. Washington.” Urban Lawyer 17 (Spring 1985): 29–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, Daniel. “Random Walks and Organizational Mortality.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (Sep-tember 1991): 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin and Ivan Katchanovski. “The Future of Private Sector Unions in the U.S.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Spring 2001): 229–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loney, Timothy J. “TQM and Labor-Management Cooperation-A Noble Experiment for the Public Sec-tor.” International Journal of Public Administration 19 (October 1996): 1845–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G. and J.P. Olsen. “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life.” American Political Science Review 78 (September 1984): 734–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, Bill and Aldrich, Howard. “Populations, Natural Selection, and Applied Organizational Science.” Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (March 1983): 101–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, Marick F. and Robert Atkin. “The Finances of Major U.S. Unions.” Industrial Relations 36 (Octo-ber 1997): 489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. The Structuring of Organizations: A Synthesis of Research. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, David W. “The Evolution of Workplace Democracy: From Labor-Management Cooperation to Total Quality Management.” In Jack Rabin et al. Handbook of Public Sector Labor Relations. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1994, pp. 253–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peli, Gabor and Bart Nooteboom. “Market Partitioning and the Geometry of the Resource Space.” Ameri-can Journal of Sociology 104 (January 1999): 1132–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, James L. “Revitalizing Employees Ties with Public Organization.” In Patricia W. Ingraham and Bar-bara S. Romzek, eds. New Paradigms for Government: Issues for the Changing Public Service. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1994, pp. 191–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, B.G. and B.W. Hogwood. “Applying Population Ecology Models to Public Organizations.” Research in Public Administration 1 Greenwood, Conn.: JAI Press, 1991, pp. 79–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccucci, Norma M. Women, Minorities, and the Unions in the Public Service. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbloom, David H. and Jay M. Shafritz. Essentials of Labor Relations. Reston, Va.: Reston Publishing, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, Lee R. and Theodore Clark, Jr. “Collective Bargaining and Politics in Public Employment.” UCLA Law Review 19 (August 1972): 887–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Jitenda V. and Charles J. Lumsden. “Theory and Research in Organizational Ecology.” Annual Review of Sociology 16 (1990): 161–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spero, Sterling D. and John M. Capozzola. The Urban Community and Its Unionized Bureaucracies. New York: Dunellen, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanfield, Rochelle L. “Remedial Lessons.” National Journal 29 (November 8, 1997): 2244–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchombe, Arthur L. “Social Structure and Organizations.” In J.G. March, ed. Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, III.: Rand McNally, 1965, pp. 153–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzner, George T. “New Roles, New Strategies: Reinventing the Public Union.” In Carolyn Ban and Norma M. Riccucci, eds. Public Personnel Management: Current Concerns, Future Challenges, 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 1997, pp. 157–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, James D. Organizations in Action. New York: Academic Press, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Lowell, Harry C. Katz, and Richard W. Hurd, eds. Rekindling the Movement: Labor's Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Lowell and Richard W. Hurd. “Building Social Movement Unionism: The Transformation of the American Labor Movement.” In Lowell Turner, Harry Katz, and Richard W. Hurd, eds. Rekindling the Movement: Labor's Quest for Relevance in the 21st Century. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2001, pp. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Federal Labor Relations: A Paradigm in Need of Reform. Washington, D.C.:Government Printing Office, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.“Union Members Summary.” www.bls.gov/news.release/union2.nro.htm (February 19, 2002).

  • U.S. National Partnership Council. A New Vision for Labor-Management Relations. Washington, D.C.: Gov-ernment Printing Office, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Secretary of Labor's Task Force on Excellence in State and Local Government. Working Together for Public Service. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Secretary of Labor, Government Printing Office, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury, Steven A. “The Scope of Bargaining and Bargaining Outcomes in the Public Schools.” Indus-trial and Labor Relations Review 38 (January 1985): 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. East Carolina University, 27858, Greenville, NC

    Richard C. Kearney

Authors
  1. Richard C. Kearney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kearney, R.C. Patterns of union decline and growth: An organizational ecology perspective. J Labor Res 24, 561–578 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-003-1014-1

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-003-1014-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation