Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information technology: The threat to unions

  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusions

Although seldom recognized in the flurry of enthusiastic support, information technology has a dark side for unions. The Internet and the Web, with its power and convenience magnified by wireless communication, will reduce the relevancy of the traditional workplace-centered appeals of organizing unions. With greater physical distance and less psychological attachment to their employer and workplace, professional, clerical, technical, and sales workers will believe that collective bargaining does not fit their situations. Organizing these workers will require that unions not only have to broaden their mode of representation, perhaps even reviving associate membership, but also compete against advocacy and identity organizations. To make matters even worse, when unions try to organize any group of workers regardless of whether or not their jobs have been transformed by information technology, and when unions try to maintain their influence in already organized workplaces, they will have to compete against employer-controlled intranets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ad Hoc Committee on Labor and the Web. “Why the Internet Matters to Organized Labor.” December 11, 2000. < www.mindopen.com/laborweb> .

  • ” Benefit Functions Top All Others on Company Intranet.” Managing HR Information Systems (June 5, 2000): 2.

  • Benson, John. “Employee Voice in Union and Nonunion Australian Workplaces.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 38 (September 2000): 453–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaison, Gary and Barbara Bigelow. Unions and Legitimacy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, forthcoming.

  • Chaison, Gary N., Magnus Sverke, and Anders Sjöberg. “How Union Mergers Affect Membership Participation.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Spring 2001): 355–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreazen, Yochi J. “Percentage of U.S. Workers in a Union Sank to a Record Low of 13.5% Last Year.” Wall Street Journal, January 19, 2001a.

  • -. “Slower Growth Threatens Labor Unions.” Wall Street Journal, January 16, 2001b.

  • Flanigan, James. “Variety Spices Work As Internet Drives Change.” Los Angeles Times, September 3, 2000.

  • Freeman, Richard B. and James L. Medoff. What Do Unions Do? New York: Basic Books, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiorito, Jack, Paul Jarley, and John Thomas Delaney. “The Adaptation of Information Technology by U.S. National Unions.” Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 55 (Summer 2000): 451–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and Robert W. Kolodinsky. “Unions and Information Technology: From Luddites to Cyberunions.” Labor Studies Journal 24 (Winter 2000): 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • ” Ford and the Internet.” Buffalo Evening News, February 8, 2000.

  • Gardyn, Rebecca. “The New American Worker: Who’s the Boss?” American Demographics 22 (September 2000): 52–56, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, Steven. “AFL-CIO Members to Get Online Access and Discounts.” New York Times, October II 1999a.

  • -. “Union Leaders See Grim News in Labor Study.” New York Times, October 13, 1999b.

  • -. “Phone Workers Fight for Place in Wireless Era.” New York Times, July 31, 2000.

  • Haeussler, Aimee R. “A Common Purpose.” September 12, 2000, < http/www.hispanicbusiness.com/community/hispanic_orgs.asp> .

  • Hapgood, Fred. “The Next Generation.” CIO Web Business Magazine March 1, 1999. < http://www.cio.com/> .

  • Heckscher, Charles. “Taking Transformation Seriously.” Paper presented at the Cornell University Conference on the Revival of the Labor Movement. October 16, 1998.

  • —. The New Unionism. New York: Basic Books, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfgott, Roy B. “The Effectiveness of Diversity Networks in Providing Collective Voice for Employees.” In B.E. Kaufman and D.G. Taras, eds. Nonunion Employee Representation: History, Contemporary Practice, and Policy. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 2000. pp. 348–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, Alan. “Employee Caucus: A Key Institution in the Emerging System of Employment Law.” Chicago-Kent Law Review 69 (1993): 149–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Industry Canada. “Intranets” December 12, 1998, < http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/SSG/> .

  • Johnston, Paul. “Social Movement Unionism: Labor as Citizenship Movement.” Paper presented at the Cornell University Conference on the Revival of the American Labor Movement. October 16, 1998.

  • Kotwica, Kathleen. “Survey: Internet Implementation and Management.” January 1998, < http://www.cio.com/> .

  • Lazarovici, Laureen. “Virtual Organizing” America Work 4 (September 1999):8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantsios, Gregory. A New Labor Movement for the New Century. New York: Monthly Review Press, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moberg, David. “The U.S. Labor Movement Faces the Twenty-First Century.” In Bruce Nissen, ed. Which Direction for Organized Labor? Essays on Organizing, Outreach and Internal Transformations. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1999. pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, Bruce. Which Direction for Organized Labor? Essays on Organizing, Outreach and Internal Transformation. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterman, Paul. Securing Prosperity: The American Labor Market: How It Has Changed and What to Do About It. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, Rod. “Ford Computer Deal Signifies Union Trend.” February 2, 2000, < http://www.mediacen-tral.com/> .

  • Peter, Kristyne. “Labor on the Internet.” Working USA 8 (May-June 1997): 82–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • PACE (Professional Association of Contract Employees), < http://www.pacepros.org/> .

  • ” Pros and Cons of Providing Employees With Home PCs to Extend HRIS.” Managing HR Information Systems (June 2000): 1.

  • Reich, Robert B. “Working, But Not ‘Employed’.” New York Times, January 9, 2001.

  • Rundle, James. “Winning Hearts and Minds in the Era of Employee-Involvement Programs.” In K. Bronfenbrenner, S. Friedman, R.W. Hurd, R.A. Oswald, and R.L. Seeber, eds. Organizing to Win: New Research on Union Strategies. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1997, pp. 213–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shostak Arthur B. CyberUnion: Empowering Labor Through Computer Technology. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe, 1999a.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Organized Labor’s Best Bet? CyberUnions!” Working Today 3 (November-December 1999b): 120–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stellin, Susan. “Intranets Nurture Companies from the Inside.” New York Times, January 29, 2001.

  • Stevens, Larry. “The Internet: Your Newest Training Tool.” Personnel Journal 75 (July 1996): 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Katherine. “The Legacy of Industrial Pluralism: The Tension between Individual Employment Rights and the New Deal Collective Bargaining System.” University of Chicago Law Review 59 (1992): 575–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taras, Daphne Gottleib. “Nonunion Representation: Complement or Threat to Unions?” In Paula Voos, ed. Proceedings of the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the Industrial Relations Research Association, Vol. 1. Madison, Wisc: IRRA, 1998, pp. 281–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templar, Andrew and Norman Solomon. “Unions and Technology: A Survey of Union Use of Information Technology.” Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations 43 (Spring 1988): 378–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, Anthony M., Samuel M. Demarie, and Anthony R. Hendrickson. “Information Technology, Unions, and the New Organization: Challenges and Opportunities for Union Survival.” Journal of Labor Research 22 (Spring 2001): 275–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • ” The Truth About Leveraging HR Information Services.” HRfocus (June 8, 2000): 11.

  • U. S. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. The Technological Reshaping of Metropolitan America. Report OTA-ETI-643. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. “BLS Releases New 1998-2008 Employment Projections.” Press release USDL 99-339, November 20, 1999.

  • Voigt, Kevin. “For ‘Extreme Telecommuters,’ Remote Work Means Really Remote.” Wall Street Journal, January 31, 2001.

  • Weinraub, Bernard. “Tentative Pact Is Reached in Actors’ Strike.” New York Times, October 24, 2000.

  • Wever, Kirsten S. “International Labor Revitalization: Enlarging the Playing Field.” Industrial Relations 37 (July 1998): 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Hoyt N. “The Future of the Labor Movement in the USA.” Paper presented at the Twelfth World Congress of the Internation Industrial Relations Association, Tokyo, Japan, May 30, 2000.

  • ” Wired Workers: Who They Are, What They’re Doing.” Pew Internet Life Report (press release) September 3, 2000, < http://pewinternet.org/> .

  • Wood, Winston. “Work Week.” Wall Street Journal, February 6, 2001.

  • Working Today, < http://www.workingtoday.org/> .

  • Yager, Daniel V. And Thomas S. Threlkeld. “Workplace Cyberspace —Going Where No Board Has Gone Before.” Employee Relations Law Journal 25 (Autumn 1999): 53–70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clark University, 01610, Worcester, MA

    Gary Chaison

Authors
  1. Gary Chaison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chaison, G. Information technology: The threat to unions. J Labor Res 23, 249–259 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-002-1005-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-002-1005-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation