Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of Self-Censorship

  • Symposium: Self-Censorship and Life in the Liberal Academy
  • Published:
Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. For an early example of this argument, see Raymond, Janice, 1979.

  2. See also Stock, Kathleen 2018.

  3. Even seemingly innocuous gender-employment terms carry assumptions concerning inferiority. For instance, Stephanie Julia Kapusta (2016) argues that family resemblance accounts of gender are unacceptable due to the way they marginalize trans identities. See Kapusta 2016.

  4. For a discussion on experiential knowledge, see Babbitt, Susan E. 1996.

  5. As Chamlee-Wright’s concern is more academic and focused on the institutions that are meant to maintain a healthy amount of abrasion, the solutions here do not necessarily offer guidance outside of academia. Unchecked reactions and unchecked content that characterizes much social media interaction FIX help create conditions for stereotype and bias to thrive. It is not just the echo chambers of reiterated beliefs that magnify stereotypes with little to no contact with those who are stereotyped, but persons are also disposed to a number of psychological mechanisms (such as confirmation bias) that tend to make these sorts of beliefs more recalcitrant (Baumeister and Vohs, 2007). Worse, corrections to false information may fail due to the “backfire effect” and purports to show that information that challenges one’s existing beliefs are not only met with resistance, but can cause the person to “support their original opinion even more strongly”(Nyhan and Reifler 2010, 307). It is with regard to this kind of unabated and dangerous speech that might make a good candidate to stricter forms of censorship.

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Ramsoomair.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramsoomair, N. Sources of Self-Censorship. Soc 56, 569–576 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-019-00417-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-019-00417-x

Navigation