Abstract
In recent decades, the number of print and electronic outlets for scholarly publication across the humanities and social sciences has grown exponentially. Business models have shifted from university presses who offer subject-based clusters of journals to include commercial publishers and open-access digital platforms. With greater pressure than ever to publish early and often for those on and just out of reach of the tenure track, concerns with the timeline to publish and the number of outlets for publication become tantamount to the texts themselves. But what happens to the literature? When does readability no longer remain a commitment an author makes to its audience or editors make to their authors? This article argues for a persistent renewal of the journal editor’s commitment to providing authors with substantive peer review and suggestions for workable revisions. Publishers of scholarly content should also renew their commitment to professional copyediting in order to create lasting contributions to sociological literature that can be digested, interpreted, and built upon by researchers and students alike.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
(2010). Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
American Association of Publishers (2015). Scholarly publishers: Who we are and what we do. http://publishers.org/our-markets/professional-scholarly-publishing/learn-more-about-scholarly-information. Accessed June 25, 2015.
Becker, H. (1986). Writing for social scientists: How to start and finish your thesis, book, or article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Butler, D. (2013). Investigating journals: the dark side of publishing. Nature (March 27). http://www.nature.com/news/investigating-journals-the-dark-side-of-publishing-1.12666. Accessed June 25, 2015.
Clement, R. W. (2011). Library and university press integration: a new vision for university publishing. Library Faculty & Staff Publications. Paper 104. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/lib_pubs/104. Accessed June 25, 2015.
Cowley, M. (1956). Sociological habit patterns in transmogrification. The Reporter 20 (September 20):41ff.
Davis, P. (2011). Copyediting and open access repositories. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/06/01/copyediting-and-open-access-repositories/http://www.economist.com/node/18744177/ (May 26). Accessed May 7, 2015.
Downes, L. (2008). In a changing world of news, an elegy for copy editors. The New York Times (June 16). http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/16/opinion/16mon4.html?_r=0. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Fine, G. A. (1988). The ten commandments of writing. The American Sociologist, 19, 152–157.
Gelb, I. (1952). A study of writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goudreau, J. (2011). Disappearing middle-class jobs. Forbes (June 22). http://www.forbes.com/sites/jennagoudreau/2011/06/22/disappearing-middle-class-jobs/. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Gowers, T. (2012). The cost of knowledge. https://gowers.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/elsevierstatementfinal.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Hunter, S. (2004). Why copy editors matter. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 36(1), 6–14.
Merton, R. (1969). Foreword to a preface for an introduction to a prolegomenon to a discourse on a certain subject. The American Sociologist, 4, 99.
Monbiot, G. (2011). Academic publishers make murdoch look like a socialist. The Guardian. (August 29) http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/aug/29/academic-publishers-murdoch-socialist. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Morris, S. (2005). The true costs of scholarly journal publishing. Learned Publishing, 18, 115–126.
Norris, M. (2015). Holy writ: learning to love the house style. New Yorker, (February 23 and March 2) http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/23/holy-writ. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Oremus, W. (2014). This is what happens when no one proofreads an academic paper. http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2014/11/11/_crappy_gabor_paper_overly_honest_citation_slips_into_peer_reviewed_journal.html. Accessed June 25, 2015.
Saller, C. (2011). Dear carol: journals vs. books copyediting.” (July 6). http://www.subversivecopyeditor.com/blog/2011/07/dear-carol-journals-vs-books-editing-copyeditor-vs-copy-editor.html. Accessed June 25, 2015.
Thatcher, S. (2008). From the University Presses—Added by copyediting. Against the Grain 20(4). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5163&context=atg. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Thatcher, S. (2011). Copyediting’s role in an open-access world. Against the Grain 23(2). http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5788&context=atg. Accessed May 7, 2015.
The Economist (2011). Of goats and headaches. (May 26). http://www.economist.com/node/18744177/. Accessed May 7, 2015.
Thompson, J. (2005). Books in the digital age: the transformation of academic higher education publishing in Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Polity.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mosser, G.F., Wohl, H. & Fine, G.A. Alone in Publand: Leaving Academics to Themselves. Am Soc 47, 238–252 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9281-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9281-x