Skip to main content
Log in

Prognostic significance of biochemical markers in African Burkitt’s lymphoma

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Clinical and Translational Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Endemic Burkitt’s lymphoma (eBL) remains the prevalent form of paediatric cancer in tropical Africa with subtle pathological differences. This calls for intensified efforts to validate the global prognostic markers within local settings for improved cancer treatment and survival. This study proposes prognostic markers for enhanced eBL treatment and management.

Patients and method

One hundred and eighty histologically and/or clinically diagnosed BL patients at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana were eligible for this cross-sectional eight-year retrospective study. Biochemical, clinical and demographic data, before chemotherapy administration, were documented and examined for their progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) significance.

Results

A mean age of 6 (SD=2.7, range: 1–16) years was observed with general male dominance (M:F=1.69:1). Total serum lactate dehydrogenase (HR=2.04; 95% CI, 1.25–3.32; log rank=8.3; p=0.004), serum creatinine (HR=3.59; 95% CI, 1.62–7.98; log rank=15.4; p=0.002) and St. Jude stage (HR=1.74; 95% CI, 1.11–2.73; log rank=8.0; p=0.015) were important independent prognostic biochemical markers for both PFS and OS. Age, serum calcium, uric acid, potassium, sodium and phosphorus were non-prognostic.

Conclusion

The better monitoring of these prognostic indices coupled with risk-stratification treatment may improve patients’ survival, especially in resource-limited settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Magrath I (1990) The pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Adv Cancer Res 55:133–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ansari M, Krajinovic M (2007) Pharmacogenomics in cancer treatment defining the genetic bases for inter-individual differences in response to chemotherapy. Curr Opin Pediatr 19:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shipp MA (1993) for The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project: a predictive model for aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hermans J, Krol ADG, van Groningen K et al (1995) International Prognostic Index is valid for all malignant grades. Blood 88:1460–1463

    Google Scholar 

  5. Federico M, Umberto V, Zinzani PL et al (2000) Prognosis of follicular lymphoma: a predictive model based on a retrospective analysis of 987 cases. Blood 95:783–789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nicolaides C, Fountzilas G, Zoumbos N et al (1998) Diffuse large cell lymphomas: identification of prognostic factors and validation of the international Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Index. Oncology 55:405–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nocolaides C, Dimon S, Pavlidis N (1998) Prognostic factors in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Oncologist 3:189–197

    Google Scholar 

  8. Plancarte F, López-Guillermo A, Arenillas L et al (2006) Follicular lymphoma in early stages: high risk of relapse and usefulness of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index to predict the outcome of patients. Eur J Haematol 76:58–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pedrosa MF, Pedrosa F, Lins MM et al (2007) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood: clinical and epidemiological characteristics and survival analysis at a single centre in Northeast Brazil. J Pediatr (Rio J) 83:547–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Owusu L, Yeboah FA, Sei-Akoto A et al (2010) Clinical and epidemiological characterisation of Burkitt’s lymphoma: an eight-year case study at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana. Br J Biomed Sci 67:9–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 17:1244–1253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG (2004) The logrank test. BMJ 328:1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cabanilla F, Burke JS, Smith TL et al (1978) Factors predicting response and survival in adults with advanced non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Arch Intern Med 138:413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Schneider RJ, Scibert K, Passe S et al (1980) Prognostic significance of serum lactate dehydrogenase in malignant lymphomas. Cancer 46:139–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisher RI, Hubbard SM, De Vita VT et al (1981) Factors predicting long-term survival in diffuse mixed, histiocytic or undifferentiated lymphoma. Blood 58:45–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Coiffier B, Gisselbrecht C, Vose JM et al (1991) Prognostic factors in aggressive malignant lymphomas: description and validation of a prognostic index that could identify patients requiring a more intensive therapy. The Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomas Aggresifs. J Clin Oncol 9:211–219

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoskin PJ, Ng V, Spinelli JJ et al (1991) Prognostic variables in patients with diffuse large cell lymphoma treated with MACOP-B. J Clin Oncol 9:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leonard RC, Hayward RL, Prescott RJ et al (1991) The identification of discrete prognosis groups in low-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 2:655–662

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez-Guillermo A, Montserrat E, Bosch F et al (1994) Applicability of the International Index for aggressive lymphomas to patients with low-grade lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 12:1343–1348

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan L, Beverly PCL, Isaacson PG (1991) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) isoenzymes and proliferative activity of lymphoid cells: an immunocytochemical study. Clin Exp Immunol 86:240–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gaw A, Cowan RA, O’Reilly DStJ et al (1999) Clinical biochemistry, 2nd ed. Harcourt Brace and Company, Edinburgh, pp 12–44, 64–72

    Google Scholar 

  22. Velasquez WS, Fuller LM, Jaganuath S et al (1991) Stage I and II diffuse large cell lymphoma: prognostic factors and long-term results with CHOP-bleo and radiation. Blood 77:942–947

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dixon DO, Neilan B, Jones SE et al (1986) Effect of age on the therapeutic outcome in advanced diffused histiocytic lymphoma. The Southwest Oncology Group Experience. J Clin Oncol 4:295–305

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lawrence Owusu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arthur, F.K.N., Owusu, L., Yeboah, F.A. et al. Prognostic significance of biochemical markers in African Burkitt’s lymphoma. Clin Transl Oncol 13, 731–736 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0724-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0724-8

Keywords

Navigation