Skip to main content
Log in

Role of Odorant Binding Proteins: Comparing Hypothetical Mechanisms with Experimental Data

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Odorant binding proteins are expressed in the olfactory epithelium of many mammalian species and are thought to assist in the uptake and transfer of odorants from the gas phase to the odor receptors. Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain how mass transfer occurs. Most experimental work has focused on the binding of ligands to odorant binding proteins or to the olfactory receptors under steady-state conditions, whereas the situation in vivo is dynamic due to the tidal flow of air through the nose and the mass transfer in and out of the olfactory epithelium. Some preliminary dynamic data have been obtained from an in vitro system, and this has been used, along with other published data, to test some of the proposed mechanisms for odorant binding protein (OBP). An assessment of the hypothetical mechanisms has been made to examine how well the mechanisms fit with the published experimental data. A new hypothesis is proposed where OBP acts to prolong the odor signal and increases the signal output of the olfactory system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Briand L, Nespoulous C, Perez V, Remy JJ, Huet JC, Pernollet JC (2000) Ligand-binding properties and structural characterization of a novel rat odorant-binding protein variant. Eur J Biochem 267(10):3079–3089

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crank J, McFarlane NR, Newby JC, Paterson GD, Pedley JB (1981) Diffusion processes in environmental systems. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham AB, Ross RJ (2007) The Biofilms Hypertextbook. Retrieved 23 December 2007

  • deRoos KB, Wolswinkel K (1994) Non-equilibrium partition model for predicting flavour release in the mouth. In: Maarse H, Van der Heij DG (eds) Trends in flavour research. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbman AI (2002) Olfactory organs of vertebrates. In: Finger TE, Silver WL, Restrepo D (eds) The neurobiology of taste and smell, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestein S, Picco C, Menini A (1993) The relation between stimulus and response in olfactory receptor-cells of the tiger salamander. J Physiol (Lond) 468:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flower DR (1996) The lipocalin protein family: Structure and function. Biochem J 318:1–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn I, Scherer PW, Mozell MM (1994) A mass-transport model of olfaction. J Theor Biol 167(2):115–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hummel T, Kobal G (2002) Olfactory event-related potentials. In: Simon SA, Nicolelis MAL (eds) Methods in chemosensory research. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang PM, Pevsner J, Sklar PB, Venable JC, Snyder SH (1988) Localization of rat odorant-binding protein to the lateral nasal gland suggests an odorant transport function. Chem Senses 13(4):699–699

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing DG, Macleod P (1992) Reaction time for the recognition of odor quality. Chem Senses 17(3):337–346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laing DG, Eddy A, Francis GW, Stephens L (1994) Evidence for the temporal processing of odor mixtures in humans. Brain Res 651(1–2):317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linforth RST, Taylor AJ (2003) Direct mass spectrometry of complex volatile and non-volatile flavour mixtures. Int J Mass Spectrom 223–224:179–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobel D, Jacob M, Volkner M, Breer H (2002) Odorants of different chemical classes interact with distinct odorant binding protein subtypes. Chem Senses 27(1):39–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mair RG, Gesteland RC, Blank DL (1982) Changes in morphology and physiology of olfactory receptor cilia during development. Neuroscience 7(12):3091–3103

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marin M, Baek I, Taylor AJ (1999) Flavour release from aqueous solutions under dynamic headspace dilution conditions. J Agric Food Chem 47:4750–4755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marin M, Baek I, Taylor AJ (2000) Flavor release as a unit operation: a mass transfer approach. In: Roberts DD, Taylor AJ (eds) Flavor release, vol 763. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Matarazzo V, Zsurger N, Guillemot JC, Clot-Faybesse O, Botto JM, Dal Farra C et al (2002) Porcine odorant-binding protein selectively binds to a human olfactory receptor. Chem Senses 27(8):691–701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menco BPM, Farbman AI (1992) Ultrastructural evidence for multiple mucous domains in frog olfactory epithelium. Cell Tissue Res 270(1):47–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nespoulous C, Briand L, Delage MM, Tran V, Pernollet JC (2004) Odorant binding and conformational changes of a rat odorant-binding protein. Chem Senses 29(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pernollet J-C, Briand L (2004) Structural recognition between odorants, olfactory-binding proteins and olfactory receptors—first events in odour coding. In: Taylor AJ, Roberts DD (eds) Flavor perception. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 86–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pevsner J, Snyder SH (1990) Odorant-binding protein—odorant transport function in the vertebrate nasal epithelium. Chem Senses 15(2):217–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjodal M, Edlund T, Gunhaga L (2007) Time of exposure to bmp signals plays a key role in the specification of the olfactory and lens placodes ex vivo. Dev Cell 13:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinbrecht RA (1998) Odorant-binding proteins: expression and function. In: Olfaction and taste XII. New York Academy of Sciences, New York, vol 855, pp 323–332

  • Stewart PS (1998) A review of experimental measurements of effective diffusive permeabilities and effective diffusion coefficients in biofilms. Biotechnol Bioeng 59(3):261–272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AJ (1998) Physical chemistry of flavour. Int J Food Sci Technol 33(1):53–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AJ (2002) Release and transport of flavours in vivo: physico chemical, physiological and perceptual considerations. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Safety and Food Science 1:45–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weisstein EW (2002) CRC concise encyclopedia of mathematics, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Loic Briand and Jean-Claude Pernollet (INRA Jouy-en-Josas, France) for generously supplying OBP and helping in setting up OBP production in our laboratory as well as discussing the merits of the different OBP binding assays. An anonymous reviewer helpfully suggested the idea of ciliary action and its potential effect on mass transfer. The UK research council, BBSRC, provided funding for the practical part of the project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, A.J., Cook, D.J. & Scott, D.J. Role of Odorant Binding Proteins: Comparing Hypothetical Mechanisms with Experimental Data. Chem. Percept. 1, 153–162 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-008-9016-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-008-9016-2

Keywords

Navigation