Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: optimization of selecting treatment modality

Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) of intermediate stage consists of diverse tumor and patient factors in terms of tumor number, size and liver function resulting in various outcomes given by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using radioactive isotope, β-ray emitting Yttrium-90 with a short half-life and penetration depth, is an emerging intra-arterial brachytherapy characterized by potent anti-cancer effect given by radiation but minimal embolic effect. Although there is lack of study directly comparing the efficacy and safety between TACE and TARE in patients with unresectable HCC, several retrospective or small-scaled studies suggest that overall efficacy indicated by overall survival and time to progression is similar between two modalities and TARE has a superiority in the safety including postembolization syndrome, hospitalization days and outpatient-based therapy. In advanced HCC with portal vein (PV) invasion, TACE is not consistently recommended due to risk of hepatic decompensation or failure after procedure. On the contrary, available data suggest that TARE might be a promising treatment option in HCC with PV thrombosis if patient’s liver function is preserved and the level of PV invasion is less than main trunk. Ongoing trials comparing TARE and sorafenib in advanced HCC would elucidate the role of this locoregional therapy. The need of a multidisciplinary team, complex steps of procedure and high cost of TARE are the hurdles to widespread recommendation of this therapy in intermediate or advanced HCC. The optimization of selection between TACE and TARE might be dependent on availability, experience, tumor factors and patient factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Park JW, Chen M, Colombo M, Roberts LR, Schwartz M, Chen PJ, et al. Global patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma management from diagnosis to death: the BRIDGE study. Liver Int 2015;35:2155–2166

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J. Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Real MI, Montana X, Planas R, Coll S, Aponte J, et al. Arterial embolization or chemoembolization versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2002;359:1734–1739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, Liu CL, Lam CM, Poon RT, et al. Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2002;35:1164–1171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology 2003;37:429–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveri RS, Wetterslev J, Gluud C. Transarterial (chemo)embolization for unresectable hepatoceulluar carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;3:CD004787

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim DY, Ryu HJ, Choi JY, Park JY, Lee DY, Kim BK, et al. Radiological response predicts survival following transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;35:1343–1350

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poon RT, Lau C, Yu WC, Wong J. High serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor predict poor response to transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study. Oncol Rep 2004;11:1077–1084

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shim JH, Park JW, Kim JH, An M, Kong SY, Nam BH, et al. Association between increment of serum VEGF level and prognosis after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Sci 2008;99:2037–2044

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lammer J, Malagari K, Vogl T, Pilleul F, Denys A, Watkinson A, et al. Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2010;33:41–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yoo HS, Lee JT, Kim KW, Kim BS, Choi HJ, Lee KS, et al. Nodular hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment with subsegmental intraarterial injection of iodine 131-labeled iodized oil. Cancer 1991;68:1878–1884

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar A, Srivastava DN, Chau TT, Long HD, Bal C, Chandra P, et al. Inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma: transarterial 188Re HDD-labeled iodized oil for treatment-prospective multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 2007;243:509–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim JK, Han KH, Lee JT, Paik YH, Ahn SH, Lee JD, et al. Long-term clinical outcome of phase IIb clinical trial of percutaneous injection with holmium-166/chitosan complex (Milican) for the treatment of small hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:543–548

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sangro B, Inarrairaegui M, Bilbao JI. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:464–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim DY, Han K-H. How to improve treatment outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma of intermediate and advanced stage. Dis Dis 2012;30:598–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas MB, Jaffe D, Choti MM, Belghiti J, Curely S, Fong Y, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: consensus recommendations of the National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3994–4005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Cheomembolization and radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:604–611

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ho S, Lau WY, Leung TW, Chang M, Johnson PJ, Li AK. Clinical evaluation of the partition model for estimating radiation doses from yttrium-90 microspheres in the treatment of hepatic cancer. Eur J Nucl Med 1997;24:293–298

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kao YH, Tan EH, Ng CE, Goh SW. Clinical implications of the body surface area method versus partition model dosimetry for Yttrium-90 radioembolization using resin microspheres: a technical review. Ann Nucl Med 2011;25:455–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee S, Kim BK, Song K, Park JY, Ahn SH, Kim SU, et al. Sub-classification of Barcelona clinic liver cancer B and C hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study of the multi-center registry database. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Epub ahead of print)

  21. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik L, et al. Radioembolization results in longer time-to-progression and reduced toxicity compared with chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2011;140:497–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kooby DA, Egnatashvili V, Srinivasan S, et al. Comparison of Yttrium-90 radioembolization and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Carr BI, Kondraqunta V, Buch SC, et al. Therapeutic equivalence in survival for hepatic arterial chemoembolization and Yttrium 90 microsphere treatments in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a two-cohort study. Cancer 2010;116:1305–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Bhoori S, Romito R, Chiesa C, Morosi C, et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 study. Hepatology 2013;57:1826–1837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim DY, Park BJ, Kim YH, Han KH, Cho SB, Cho KR, et al. Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 resin microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. Am J Clin Oncol 2015;38:495–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Moreno-Luna LE, Yang JD, Sanchez W, Paz-Fumagalli R, Harnois DM, Mettler TA, et al. Efficacy and safety of transarterial radioembolization versus chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36:714–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. El Fouly A, Ertle J, El Dorry A, Shaker MK, Dechene A, Abdella H, et al. In intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma: radioembolization with yttrium 90 or chemoembolization? Liver Int 2015;35:627–635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kolligs FT, Bilbao JI, Jakobs T, Inarrairaegui M, Nagel JM, Rodriguez M, et al. Pilot randomized trial of selective internal radiation therapy vs. chemoembolization in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2015;35:1715–1721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, Matsui O, Sakamoto M, Nakashima O, et al. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 2011;29:339–364

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Seong J, Park HC, Han KH, Chon CY. Clinical results and prognostic factors in radiotherapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study of 158 patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;55:329–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tsai AL, Burke CT, Kennedy AS, Moore DT, Mauro MA, Dixon RD, et al. Use of Yttrium-90 microspheres in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2010;21:1377–1384

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Riaz A, Ryu RK, Ibrahim S, et al. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using Yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology 2010;138:52–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Li Y, Ji H, Zhao X, Lu H. Transarterial Y90 radioembolization versus chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Biosci Trends 2015;9:289–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Takayasu K, Arii S, Ikai I, Omata M, Okita K, Ichida T, et al. Prospective cohort study of transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in 8510 patients. Gastroenterology 2006;131:461–469

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R, Golfieri R, Gasparini D, Ezziddin S, et al. Survival after Yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across Barecelona clinic liver cancer stages: a European evaluation. Hepatology 2011;54:868–878

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Inarrairaegui M, Martinez-Cuesta A, Rodriguez M, Bilbao JI, Arbizu J, Benito A, et al. Analysys of prognostic factors after Yttrium-90 radioembolization of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010;77:1441–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Song MJ, Chun HJ, Song DS, et al. Comparative study between doxorubicin-eluting beads and conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;57:1244–1250

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang K, Zhou Q, Wang R, et al. Doxorubicin-eluting beads versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;29:920–925

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. European Association for the Study of the Liver, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2012;56:908–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Llado L, Virgili J, Figueras J, Valls C, Dominguez J, Rafecas A, et al. A prognostic index of the survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter arterial embolization. Cancer 2000;88:50–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Raoul JL, Sangro B, Forner A, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L, et al. Evolving strategies for the management of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: available evidence and expert opinion on the use of transarterial chemoemolization. Cancer Treat Rev 2011;37:212–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Takayasu K. Superselective transarterial chemoemolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progression and perspective. Oncology 2011;81(Suppl 1):105–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chern MC, Chuang VP, Liang CT, Lin ZH, Kuo TM. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion: safety, efficacy, and prognostic factors. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2014;25:32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim JH, Yoon HK, Kim SY, Kim KM, Ko GY, Gwon DI, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization vs. chemoinfusion for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with major portal vein thrombosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:1291–1298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu L, Zhang C, Zhao Y, Qi X, Chen H, Bai W, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: prognostic factors in a single-center study of 188 patients. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:194278

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Tawada A, Chiba T, Ooka Y, Kanogawa N, Motoyama T, Saito T, et al. Efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization targeting portal vein tumor thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 2014;34:4213–4238

    Google Scholar 

  47. Memon K, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Benson AB, Ganger D, et al. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis: impact of liver function on systemic treatment options at disease progression. J Hepatol 2013;58:73–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y, Kanogawa N, Motoyama T, Suzuki E, et al. Efficacy of sorafenib in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to transarterial chemoembolization. Oncology 2014;87:330–341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rostambeigi N, Dekarske AS, Austin EE, Golzarian J, Cressman EN. Cost effectiveness of radioembolization compared with conventional transarterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vas Interv Radiol 2014;25:1075–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dong-Su Jang (Medical illustrator, Medical Research Support Section, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea) for his help with the figure.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kwang-Hyub Han.

Ethics declarations

Funding

The authors had not received any grant support in this study.

Conflict of Interest

Do Young Kim and Kwang-Hyub Han declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any study with human participants or animal performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, D.Y., Han, KH. Transarterial chemoembolization versus transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma: optimization of selecting treatment modality. Hepatol Int 10, 883–892 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-016-9722-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-016-9722-9

Keywords

Navigation