Skip to main content
Log in

Project management infrastructure: The key to operational performance improvement

  • Published:
Operations Management Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Process improvement programs such as Six Sigma, Lean, and Lean Sigma are very important and deserve serious academic research attention. However, definition problems make it difficult to study any specific type of process improvement program. Therefore, this study defines two organizational level program management factors, Strategic Project Selection (SPS) and Project Management Infrastructure (PMI), that are independent of any specific process improvement program. Drawing upon current literature, this study develops and tests theoretical models that relate SPS and PMI to operational performance improvement and to each other. Using empirical data collected from 53 supplier plants of one large high-tech firm, this study finds that at the plant level, SPS mediates the relationship between PMI and operational performance improvement. This insight contributes to both theory development and practice, suggesting that a viable strategy for a process improvement program’s success is to focus on PMI in order to enhance SPS and ultimately improve performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahire SL, Golhar DY, Waller MA (1996) Development and validation of TQM implementation constructs. Decis Sci 27:23–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron RM, Kenny DA (1986) The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51:1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson RF, Cunningham SP, Leachman RC (1995) Benchmarking manufacturing performance in the semiconductor industry. Prod Oper Manag 4:201–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossidy L, Charan R, Burck C (2002) Execution: the discipline of getting things done, 1st edn. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer KK, Pagell M (2000) Measurement issues in empirical research: improving measures of operations strategy and advanced manufacturing technology. J Oper Manag 18:361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer KK, Verma R (2000) Multiple raters in survey-based operations management research: a review and tutorial. Prod Oper Manag 9:128–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer KK, Olson JR, Calantone RJ, Jackson EC (2002) Print versus electronic surveys: a comparison of two data collection methodologies. J Oper Manag 20:357–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DT, Fiske DW (1959) Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychol Bull 58:81–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines EG, Zeller RA (1979) Reliability and validity assessment. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler AD (1969) Strategy and structure: chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles T, Paul R (2001) Hoshin Kanri: a tool for strategic policy deployment. Knowl Process Manag 8:262–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinander KR (2001) Aligning accountability and awareness for environmental performance in operations. Prod Oper Manag 10:276–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill GA (1979) Marketing research: methodological foundations, 2nd edn. Dryden, Hinsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1962) On rational decision making. Manage Technol 2:71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina JM (1993) Interaction, nonlinearity, and multicollinearity: implications for multiple regression. J Manage 19:915–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft RL (2000) Organization theory and design, 7th edn. West Pub. Co., Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean JW Jr, Bowen DE (1994) Management theory and total quality: improving research and practice through theory development. Acad Manage Rev 19:392–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming WE (1986) Out of the crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (2001) The contingency theory of organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton GS, Jarrell SL (1998) The effects of total quality management on corporate performance: an empirical investigation. J Bus 71:253–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckes G (2003) Six Sigma team dynamics: the elusive key to project success. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdows K, De Meyer A (1990) Lasting improvements in manufacturing performance: in search of a new theory. J Oper Manag 9:168–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Sakakibara S, Schroeder RG, Bates KA, Flynn EJ (1990) Empirical research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag 9:250–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1994) A framework for quality management research and an associated measurement instrument. J Oper Manag 11:339–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Schroeder RG, Sakakibara S (1995) The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decis Sci 26:659–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn BB, Flynn EJ, Amundson SK, Schroeder RG (1999) Product development speed and quality: a new set of synergies. In: Stahl MJ (ed) Perspectives in total quality. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 245–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich MT (2002) Techniques for improving response rates in OM survey research. J Oper Manag 20:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George ML (2002) Lean Six Sigma: combining Six Sigma quality with lean speed. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Goll I, Rasheed AMA (1997) Rational decision-making and firm performance: the moderating role of environment. Strateg Manage J 18:583–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray CF, Larson EW (2000) Project management: the managerial process. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12:1–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF (1995) Multivariate data analysis with readings, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Stanton S (1999) How process enterprises really work. Harvard Bus Rev 77(6):108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (1997) Does implementing an effective TQM program actually improve operating performance? Empirical evidence from firms that have won quality awards. Manage Sci 43:1258–1274

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks KB, Singhal VR (2001) The long-run stock price performance of firms with effective TQM programs. Manage Sci 47:359–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James LR, Brett JM (1984) Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. J Appl Psychol 69:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson A, Morris PWG (2004) Moving from corporate strategy to project strategy. In: Morris P, Pinto JK (eds) The Wiley guide to managing projects. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd CM, Kenny DA (1981) Process analysis: estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Eval Rev 5:602–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung JY, Lim S-G (2007) Project categorization, prioritization, and execution based on Six Sigma concept: a case study of operational improvement project. Proj Manage J 38(1):55–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2004) Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RS, Norton DP (2006) Alignment: using the balanced scorecard to create corporate synergies. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaynak H (2003) The relationship between total quality management practices and their effects on firm performance. J Oper Manag 21:405–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen RD, Jacobs J (2001) Experimental comparison of web, electronic and mail survey technologies in operations management. J Oper Manag 19:713–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latane HA (1959) Rational decision-making in portfolio management. J Finance 14:429–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laugen BT, Boer H (2007) The implementation of best practices: process and performance effects. Creat Innov Manag 16:397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Zaheer S, Choo AS (2003) Six Sigma: a goal-theoretic perspective. J Oper Manag 21:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linderman K, Schroeder RG, Choo AS (2006) Six Sigma: the role of goals in improvement teams. J Oper Manag 24:779–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan H, Tampoe M (2000) Strategic management: process, content, and implementation. Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16:407–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1992) Environmental fit versus internal fit. Organ Sci 3:159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milosevic DZ, Srivannaboon S (2006) A theoretical framework for aligning project management with business strategy. Proj Manage J 37(3):98–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Manage Sci 24:934–948

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter J, Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CJ, Wasserman W (1996) Applied linear statistical models, 4th edn. WCB/McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrie J, Walker DHT (2004) A balanced scorecard approach to project management leadership. Proj Manage J 35(4):47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pande PS, Neuman RP, Cavanagh RR (2000) The Six Sigma way: how GE, Motorola, and other top companies are honing their performance. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pockell L, Avila A (2004) The 101 greatest business principles of all time. Warner Business Books, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88:879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Project Management Institute Standards Committee (2004) A guide to the project management body of knowledge, 3rd edn. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed R, Lemak DJ, Montgomery JC (1996) Beyond process: TQM content and firm performance. Acad Manage Rev 21:173–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samson D, Terziovski M (1999) The relationship between total quality management practices and operational performance. J Oper Manag 17:393–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein EH (1992) Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder RG, Linderman K, Liedtke C, Choo AS (2008) Six Sigma: definition and underlying theory. J Oper Manag 26:536–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (1981) Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott WR (2001) Institutions and organizations, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah R, Ward PT (2003) Lean manufacturing: context, practice bundles, and performance. J Oper Manag 21:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar AJ (2004) Strategic project leadership: toward a strategic approach to project management. R&D Manage 34:569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan BM (1993) Policy deployment: the TQM approach to long-range planning. ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver EA (2004) Process management instead of operations management. Manuf Serv Oper Manag 6:273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1979) Rational decision making in business organizations. Am Econ Rev 69:493–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamper CL, Van Dyne L (2001) Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: a field study of restaurant employees. J Organ Behav 22:517–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsikriktsis N (2005) A review of techniques for treating missing data in OM survey research. J Oper Manag 24:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven AH, Drazin R (1985) The concept of fit in contingency theory. Res Organ Behav 7:333–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N (1989) The concept of fit in strategy research: toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Acad Manage Rev 14:423–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N, Camillus JC (1984) Exploring the concept of “Fit” in strategic management. Acad Manage Rev 9:513–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatraman N, Prescott JE (1990) Environment-strategy coalignment: an empirical test of its performance implications. Strateg Manage J 11:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacker JG (2004) A theory of formal conceptual definitions: developing theory-building measurement instruments. J Oper Manag 22:629–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world, 1st edn. HarperPerennial, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshio K (1998) Hoshin kanri - a participative way of quality management in Japan. TQM Mag 10:425–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zack MH (1999) Developing a knowledge strategy. Calif Manage Rev 41(3):125–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu X, Fredendall LD, Robbins TL (2006) Organizational culture and quality practices in Six Sigma, DSI 2006 Conference Proceedings. San Antonio, TX

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur V. Hill.

Additional information

Not to be reproduced or quoted without written permission from the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Hill, A.V., Schroeder, R.G. et al. Project management infrastructure: The key to operational performance improvement. Oper Manag Res 1, 40–52 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-008-0008-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-008-0008-9

Keywords

Navigation