Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Management of screening-detected ground glass nodules: a narrative review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wide-scale application of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening has led to an increased detection of ground glass nodule (GGN) lesions. However, there is still no clear management plan for these lesions after detection. Clinicians are usually faced with a dilemma in choosing the best initial management approach that not only limits overtreatment but also avoids the possibility of lesions growing into invasive carcinoma. Most current and past guidelines favor surveillance with computed tomography (CT) as the initial management approach based on the notion that the majority of GGN lesions are indolent tumors. Immediate surgery is generally considered overtreatment and is usually only recommended when the lesion grows in size, persists, or increases its solid component during follow-up CT surveillance. However, due to evolution of surgery to minimal invasive procedures, such as uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery, and the development of enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery protocols, modern surgery is now safer and associated with less postoperative mortality. Additionally, intraoperative frozen sections can be used to guide resection, making initial management via surgery more attractive than before. Based on these developments, this review recommends that immediate surgery should be considered at the same level as follow-up CT surveillance when making multidisciplinary team decisions for screening-detected GGNs, as it provides both a diagnostic and treatment role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sihoe ADL, Cardillo G. Solitary pulmonary ground-glass opacity: is it time for new surgical guidelines? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;52:848–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang Y, Jheon S, Li H, Zhang H, Xie Y, Qian B, et al. Results of low-dose computed tomography as a regular health examination among Chinese hospital employees. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;160:824-31.e4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H, McLoud TC, Müller NL, Remy J. Fleischner Society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:697–722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Duann CW, Hung JJ, Hsu PK, Huang CS, Hsieh CC, Hsu HS, et al. Surgical outcomes in lung cancer presenting as ground-glass opacities of 3 cm or less: a review of 5 years’ experience. J Chin Med Assoc: JCMA. 2013;76:693–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki K, Kusumoto M, Watanabe S, Tsuchiya R, Asamura H. Radiologic classification of small adenocarcinoma of the lung: radiologic-pathologic correlation and its prognostic impact. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:413–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kakinuma R, Noguchi M, Ashizawa K, Kuriyama K, Maeshima AM, Koizumi N, et al. Natural history of pulmonary subsolid nodules: a prospective multicenter study. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:1012–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Noguchi M, Morikawa A, Kawasaki M, Matsuno Y, Yamada T, Hirohashi S, et al. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung. Histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer. 1995;75:2844–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, Nicholson AG, Geisinger KR, Yatabe Y, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2011;6:244–85.

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacMahon H, Naidich DP, Goo JM, Lee KS, Leung ANC, Mayo JR, et al. Guidelines for management of incidental pulmonary nodules detected on CT Images: from the Fleischner Society 2017. Radiology. 2017;284:228–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e93S-e120S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Callister ME, Baldwin DR, Akram AR, Barnard S, Cane P, Draffan J, et al. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules. Thorax. 2015;70:ii1–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bai C, Choi CM, Chu CM, Anantham D, Chung-Man Ho J, Khan AZ, et al. Evaluation of pulmonary nodules: clinical practice consensus guidelines for Asia. Chest. 2016;150:877–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee JH, Hong JI, Kim HK. Guidelines for the investigation and management of ground glass nodules. J Chest Surg. 2021;54:333–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Godoy MC, Naidich DP. Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27:240–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:395–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YW, Kwon BS, Lim SY, Lee YJ, Park JS, Cho Y-J, et al. Lung cancer probability and clinical outcomes of baseline and new subsolid nodules detected on low-dose CT screening. Thorax. 2021;76:980–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scholten ET, de Jong PA, de Hoop B, van Klaveren R, van Amelsvoort-van de Vorst S, Oudkerk M, et al. Towards a close computed tomography monitoring approach for screen detected subsolid pulmonary nodules? Eur Respir J. 2015;45:765–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Henschke CI, Yip R, Smith JP, Wolf AS, Flores RM, Liang M, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: part-solid nodules in baseline and annual repeat rounds. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;207:1176–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Min JH, Lee HY, Lee KS, Han J, Park K, Ahn MJ, et al. Stepwise evolution from a focal pure pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodule into an invasive lung adenocarcinoma: an observation for more than 10 years. Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2010;69:123–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Silva M, Sverzellati N, Manna C, Negrini G, Marchianò A, Zompatori M, et al. Long-term surveillance of ground-glass nodules: evidence from the MILD trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kobayashi Y, Mitsudomi T. Management of ground-glass opacities: should all pulmonary lesions with ground-glass opacity be surgically resected? Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2013;2:354–63.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawada S, Yamashita N, Sugimoto R, Ueno T, Yamashita M. Long-term outcomes of patients with ground-glass opacities detected using CT scanning. Chest. 2017;151:308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cho J, Kim ES, Kim SJ, Lee YJ, Park JS, Cho YJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of small pulmonary ground-glass nodules stable for 3 years: implications of the proper follow-up period and risk factors for subsequent growth. J Thorac Oncol Off Publ Int Assoc Study Lung Cancer. 2016;11:1453–9.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lu Y, Sun Z, Li H, Chen X, Li Y, Sun L, et al. Radiological evidence of rapid growth acceleration of a small part solid nodule found to be large-cell carcinoma of the lung. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;18:236.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Song YS, Park CM, Park SJ, Lee SM, Jeon YK, Goo JM. Volume and mass doubling times of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules detected in patients without known malignancy. Radiology. 2014;273:276–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Oda S, Awai K, Murao K, Ozawa A, Utsunomiya D, Yanaga Y, et al. Volume-doubling time of pulmonary nodules with ground glass opacity at multidetector CT: assessment with computer-aided three-dimensional volumetry. Acad Radiol. 2011;18:63–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heuvelmans MA, Oudkerk M, de Bock GH, de Koning HJ, Xie X, van Ooijen PM, et al. Optimisation of volume-doubling time cutoff for fast-growing lung nodules in CT lung cancer screening reduces false-positive referrals. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:1836–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang B, Hwang JH, Choi YH, Chung MP, Kim H, Kwon OJ, et al. Natural history of pure ground-glass opacity lung nodules detected by low-dose CT scan. Chest. 2013;143:172–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mikami N, Takeda A, Hashimoto A, Takeda T, Kimura Y, Oku Y, et al. CT Findings and treatment outcomes of ground-glass opacity predominant lung cancer after stereotactic body radiotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2022;23:428–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gould MK, Donington J, Lynch WR, Mazzone PJ, Midthun DE, Naidich DP, et al. Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: When is it lung cancer?: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e93S-e120S.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee SM, Park CM, Goo JM, Lee HJ, Wi JY, Kang CH. Invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas versus preinvasive lesions appearing as ground-glass nodules: differentiation by using CT features. Radiology. 2013;268:265–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rampinelli C, De Marco P, Origgi D, Maisonneuve P, Casiraghi M, Veronesi G, et al. Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2017;356: j347.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rivera MP, Mehta AC. Initial diagnosis of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007;132:131s–48s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hur J, Lee HJ, Nam JE, Kim YJ, Kim TH, Choe KO, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of CT fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration biopsy of ground-glass opacity pulmonary lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Shimizu K, Ikeda N, Tsuboi M, Hirano T, Kato H. Percutaneous CT-guided fine needle aspiration for lung cancer smaller than 2 cm and revealed by ground-glass opacity at CT. Lung Cancer. 2006;51:173–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kodama H, Yamakado K, Hasegawa T, Takao M, Taguchi O, Fukai I, et al. Radiofrequency ablation for ground-glass opacity-dominant lung adenocarcinoma. J Vasc Intervent Radiol: JVIR. 2014;25:333–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Shirvani SM, Jiang J, Chang JY, Welsh J, Likhacheva A, Buchholz TA, et al. Lobectomy, sublobar resection, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage non-small cell lung cancers in the elderly. JAMA Surg. 2014;149:1244–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Paul S, Lee PC, Mao J, Isaacs AJ, Sedrakyan A. Long term survival with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) versus thoracoscopic sublobar lung resection in elderly people: national population based study with propensity matched comparative analysis. BMJ (Clinical Research ed). 2016;354:i3570.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Schneider BJ, Daly ME, Kennedy EB, Antonoff MB, Broderick S, Feldman J, et al. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Endorsement of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Evidence-Based Guideline. J Clin Oncol: Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2018;36:710–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. D’Amico TA. The best that surgery has to offer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:699–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Sihoe ADL, Han B, Yang TY, Pan C, Jiang G, Fang VWT. The advent of ultra-high volume thoracic surgical centers in Shanghai. World J Surg. 2017;41:2758–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pagès PB, Mariet AS, Madelaine L, Cottenet J, Hanna HA, Quantin C, et al. Impact of video-assisted thoracic surgery approach on postoperative mortality after lobectomy in octogenarians. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157:1660–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Zheng D, Chen H. Lung cancer screening in China: early-stage lung cancer and minimally invasive surgery 3.0. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:S1677-s9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Zaman M, Bilal H, Woo CY, Tang A. In patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery excision, what is the best way to locate a subcentimetre solitary pulmonary nodule in order to achieve successful excision? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;15:266–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kondo R, Yoshida K, Hamanaka K, Hashizume M, Ushiyama T, Hyogotani A, et al. Intraoperative ultrasonographic localization of pulmonary ground-glass opacities. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138:837–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Brunelli A, Blackmon SH, Sentürk M, Cavalheri V, Pompili C. Patient-centred care in thoracic surgery: a holistic approach—A review of the subjects of enhanced recovery after surgery, rehabilitation, pain management and patient-reported outcome measures in thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2022;14:546.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Razi SS, Stephens-McDonnough JA, Haq S, Fabbro M 2nd, Sanchez AN, Epstein RH, et al. Significant reduction of postoperative pain and opioid analgesics requirement with an Enhanced Recovery After Thoracic Surgery protocol. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;161:1689–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ginsberg RJ, Rubinstein LV. Randomized trial of lobectomy versus limited resection for T1 N0 non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:615–22 (discussion 22-3).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ichiki Y, Hanagiri T, Baba T, So T, Ono K, Uramoto H, et al. Limited pulmonary resection for peripheral small-sized adenocarcinoma of the lung. Int J Surg. 2011;9:155–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Takami K, Oda K, Okami J, Maeda J, et al. Treatment strategy for patients with small peripheral lung lesion(s): intermediate-term results of prospective study. Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-thorac Surg. 2008;34:1068–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Yamada S, Kohno T. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for pure ground-glass opacities 2 cm or less in diameter. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:1911–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Harada H, Okada M, Sakamoto T, Matsuoka H, Tsubota N. Functional advantage after radical segmentectomy versus lobectomy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2041–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Stamatis G, Leschber G, Schwarz B, Brintrup DL, Ose C, Weinreich G, et al. Perioperative course and quality of life in a prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial, comparing standard lobectomy versus anatomical segmentectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer up to 2 cm, stage IA (7th edition of TNM staging system). Lung Cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2019;138:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Keenan RJ, Landreneau RJ, Maley RH Jr, Singh D, Macherey R, Bartley S, et al. Segmental resection spares pulmonary function in patients with stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78:228–33 (discussion -33).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Yoshida J. Management of the peripheral small ground-glass opacities. Thorac Surg Clin. 2007;17:191–201, viii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Su TH, Fan YF, Jin L, He W, Hu LB. CT-guided localization of small pulmonary nodules using adjacent microcoil implantation prior to video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical resection. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:2627–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Liu S, Wang R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Cheng C, Pan Y, et al. Precise diagnosis of intraoperative frozen section is an effective method to guide resection strategy for peripheral small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2016;34:307–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, No. 1095, Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan, 430030, Hubei, China

    Willis Wasonga Omindo

Authors
  1. Willis Wasonga Omindo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Willis Wasonga Omindo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval (human and animal rights statement)

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest with the contents of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omindo, W.W. Management of screening-detected ground glass nodules: a narrative review. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 40, 205–212 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01595-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01595-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation