Abstract
Objective
On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB.
Methods
From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function.
Results
The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation.
Conclusions
OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mizutani S, Matsuura A, Miyahara K, et al. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass: a propensity matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1368–1373.
Narayan P, Rogers CA, Bayliss KM, et al. On-pump coronary surgery with and without cardioplegic arrest: comparison of inflammation, myocardial, cerebral and renal injury and early and late health outcome in a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.032.
Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Giunti G, et al. Does on-pump/beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting offer better outcome in end-stage coronary artery disease patients? J Card Surg. 2000;15:403–410.
Sabban MA, Jalal A, Bakir BM, et al. Comparison of neurological outcomes in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump beating heart coronary bypass, and off-pump coronary bypass. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2007;12:35–41.
Tsai Y-T, Lin F-Y, Lai C-H, Lin Y-C, Lin C-Y, Tsai C-S. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass provides efficacious short- and long-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2059–2065. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr536.
Pegg TJ, Selvanayagam JB, Francis JM, et al. A randomized trial of on-pump beating heart and conventional cardioplegic arrest in coronary artery bypass surgery patients with impaired left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation. 2008;118:2130–2138. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785105.
Edgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, et al. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1138–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00747-1.
Darwazah AK, Bader V, Isleem I, Helwa K. Myocardial revascularization using on-pump beating heart among patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-109.
Letsou GV, Wu YX, Grunkemeier G, Rampurwala MM, Kaiser L, Salaskar AL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass and avoidance of hypothermic cardiac arrest improves early left ventricular function in patients with systolic dysfunction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.005.
Munos E, Calderon J, Pillois X, et al. Beating-heart coronary artery bypass surgery with the help of mini extracorporeal circulation for very high-risk patients. Perfusion. 2011;26:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659110395650.
Reber D, Brouwer R, Buchwald D, et al. Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting. Artif Organs. 2010;34:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00836.x.
Tarakji KG, Sabik JF 3rd, Bhudia SK, Batizy LH, Blackstone EH. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2011;305:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.37.
Uva MS, Rodrigues V, Monteiro N, et al. Coronary surgery: which method to use? Rev Port Cardiol. 2004;23:517–530.
Wang W, Wang Y, Piao H, et al. Early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34:62–69.
Xia LM, Ji Q, Song K, et al. Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: The experience of a single center. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0572-x.
Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–212. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2872.
Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Data Collection | STS. https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database/adultcardiac-surgery-database/data-collection. Accessed 30 Dec 2020.
Sweeney MS, Frazier OH. Device-supported myocardial revascularization: safe help for sick hearts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)90071-b.
Perrault LP, Menasché P, Peynet J, et al. On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patients: an acceptable trade-off? Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00842-4.
Flack JE 3rd, Cook JR, May SJ, et al. Does cardioplegia type affect outcome and survival in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction? Results from the CABG Patch Trial. Circulation. 2000;102:III84–89. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-84.
Chowdhury UK, Malik V, Yadav R, et al. Myocardial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting: on-pump versus off-pump comparison by measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin release. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1110-9,1119.e1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.029.
Nicolini F, Beghi C, Muscari C, et al. Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: current options and future challenges. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00475-5.
Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00072-x.
Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00566-4.
Ivey CL, Williams FM, Collins PD, Jose PJ, Williams TJ. Neutrophil chemoattractants generated in two phases during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium in the rabbit. Evidence for a role for C5a and interleukin-8. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2720–2728. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117974.
Butler J, Parker D, Pillai R, Westaby S, Shale DJ, Rocker GM. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on systemic release of neutrophil elastase and tumor necrosis factor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:25–30.
Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1714–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00055-0.
Izumi Y, Magishi K, Ishikawa N, Kimura F. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.036.
Erkut B, Dag O, Kaygin MA, et al. On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: Early outcomes. Can J Surg. 2013;56:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018412.
Algranati D, Kassab GS, Lanir Y. Why is the subendocardium more vulnerable to ischemia? A new paradigm. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;300:H1090–H1100. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00473.2010.
Vijayan S, Barmby DS, Pearson IR, Davies AG, Wheatcroft SB, Sivananthan M. Assessing coronary blood flow physiology in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;13:232–243. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X13666170525102618.
Nakajima H, Iguchi A, Tabata M, et al. Preserved autoregulation of coronary flow after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: retrospective assessment of intraoperative transit time flowmetry with and without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0550-8.
Mo A, Lin H, Wen Z, Lu W, Long X, Zhou Y. Efficacy and safety of on-pump beating heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.003.
Buckberg GD. Left ventricular subendocardial necrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977;24:379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63418-2.
Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.
Sepehripour AH, Chaudhry UAR, Harling L, Athanasiou T. Off-pump or on-pump beating heart: which technique offers better outcomes following coronary revascularization? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:546–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu451.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics committee approval
Was obtained from the institutional ethics committee (NHRTIICSEC/AP/2021/002) on the 4th of January 2021.
Human rights statement
The research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.
Informed consent
As the study was a retrospective analysis of data, the need for individual patient consent was waived off.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rao, Y.M., Potdar, S., Das, D. et al. On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization—a propensity-matched comparison. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 37, 639–646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01209-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01209-x