Skip to main content
Log in

On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization—a propensity-matched comparison

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

On-pump beating heart (OP-BH) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is often undertaken as an alternative between off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (On-pump CABG), especially in India. However, outcome data following OP-BH surgery is sparse. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of OP-BH CABG with OPCAB.

Methods

From our institutional database, all patients undergoing OP-BH CABG (n = 531) were identified. A propensity-matched cohort undergoing OPCAB (n = 531) was identified from the database. Nearest neighbor matching technique was used and the groups were matched for variables including age, gender, body mass index, EuroSCORE, history of recent myocardial infarction or unstable angina, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive airway disease, diabetes, pre-op renal impairment, pre-op neurological events, and left ventricular function.

Results

The propensity-matched groups were well matched in terms of baseline characteristics. The mean EuroSCORE was 3.17 and 3.20 in the OP-BH and the OPCAB groups. The unadjusted 30-day mortality in the propensity-matched OPCAB group was 2.07% (11/531) while mortality in the on-pump beating heart group was significantly higher at 6.9% (37/531). Multivariate analysis showed that OP-BH CABG was an independent risk factor for 30-day mortality as well as major adverse post-operative outcomes including renal, neurological, and respiratory outcomes and post-operative atrial fibrillation.

Conclusions

OP-BH CABG is associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to patients undergoing OPCAB.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mizutani S, Matsuura A, Miyahara K, et al. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass: a propensity matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83:1368–1373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Narayan P, Rogers CA, Bayliss KM, et al. On-pump coronary surgery with and without cardioplegic arrest: comparison of inflammation, myocardial, cerebral and renal injury and early and late health outcome in a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;39:675–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.08.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prifti E, Bonacchi M, Giunti G, et al. Does on-pump/beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting offer better outcome in end-stage coronary artery disease patients? J Card Surg. 2000;15:403–410.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sabban MA, Jalal A, Bakir BM, et al. Comparison of neurological outcomes in patients undergoing conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, on-pump beating heart coronary bypass, and off-pump coronary bypass. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2007;12:35–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tsai Y-T, Lin F-Y, Lai C-H, Lin Y-C, Lin C-Y, Tsai C-S. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass provides efficacious short- and long-term outcomes in hemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:2059–2065. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pegg TJ, Selvanayagam JB, Francis JM, et al. A randomized trial of on-pump beating heart and conventional cardioplegic arrest in coronary artery bypass surgery patients with impaired left ventricular function using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation. 2008;118:2130–2138. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.785105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Edgerton JR, Dewey TM, Magee MJ, et al. Conversion in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an analysis of predictors and outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1138–1142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00747-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darwazah AK, Bader V, Isleem I, Helwa K. Myocardial revascularization using on-pump beating heart among patients with left ventricular dysfunction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;5:109. https://doi.org/10.1186/1749-8090-5-109.

  9. Letsou GV, Wu YX, Grunkemeier G, Rampurwala MM, Kaiser L, Salaskar AL. Off-pump coronary artery bypass and avoidance of hypothermic cardiac arrest improves early left ventricular function in patients with systolic dysfunction. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;40:227–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.11.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Munos E, Calderon J, Pillois X, et al. Beating-heart coronary artery bypass surgery with the help of mini extracorporeal circulation for very high-risk patients. Perfusion. 2011;26:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267659110395650.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Reber D, Brouwer R, Buchwald D, et al. Beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting with miniaturized cardiopulmonary bypass results in a more complete revascularization when compared to off-pump grafting. Artif Organs. 2010;34:179–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00836.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tarakji KG, Sabik JF 3rd, Bhudia SK, Batizy LH, Blackstone EH. Temporal onset, risk factors, and outcomes associated with stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. JAMA. 2011;305:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Uva MS, Rodrigues V, Monteiro N, et al. Coronary surgery: which method to use? Rev Port Cardiol. 2004;23:517–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang W, Wang Y, Piao H, et al. Early and medium outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump CABG in patients with moderate left ventricular dysfunction. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34:62–69.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Xia LM, Ji Q, Song K, et al. Early clinical outcomes of on-pump beating-heart versus off-pump technique for surgical revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: The experience of a single center. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;12:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-017-0572-x.

  16. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Mehta RL, Palevsky P. Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care. 2004;8:R204–212. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Data Collection | STS. https://www.sts.org/registries-research-center/sts-national-database/adultcardiac-surgery-database/data-collection. Accessed 30 Dec 2020.

  18. Sweeney MS, Frazier OH. Device-supported myocardial revascularization: safe help for sick hearts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:1065–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)90071-b.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perrault LP, Menasché P, Peynet J, et al. On-pump, beating-heart coronary artery operations in high-risk patients: an acceptable trade-off? Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;64:1368–1373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(97)00842-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Flack JE 3rd, Cook JR, May SJ, et al. Does cardioplegia type affect outcome and survival in patients with advanced left ventricular dysfunction? Results from the CABG Patch Trial. Circulation. 2000;102:III84–89. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.102.suppl_3.iii-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chowdhury UK, Malik V, Yadav R, et al. Myocardial injury in coronary artery bypass grafting: on-pump versus off-pump comparison by measuring high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid-binding protein, creatine kinase-MB, and myoglobin release. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;135:1110-9,1119.e1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.029.

  22. Nicolini F, Beghi C, Muscari C, et al. Myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: current options and future challenges. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;24:986–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00475-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Gomes WJ, Caputo M, Bryan AJ, Angelini GD. Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;15:685–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(99)00072-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ascione R, Lloyd CT, Underwood MJ, Gomes WJ, Angelini GD. On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:493–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(99)00566-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ivey CL, Williams FM, Collins PD, Jose PJ, Williams TJ. Neutrophil chemoattractants generated in two phases during reperfusion of ischemic myocardium in the rabbit. Evidence for a role for C5a and interleukin-8. J Clin Invest. 1995;95:2720–2728. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117974.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Butler J, Parker D, Pillai R, Westaby S, Shale DJ, Rocker GM. Effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on systemic release of neutrophil elastase and tumor necrosis factor. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;105:25–30.

  27. Cremer J, Martin M, Redl H, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1714–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(96)00055-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Izumi Y, Magishi K, Ishikawa N, Kimura F. On-pump beating-heart coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:573–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Erkut B, Dag O, Kaygin MA, et al. On-pump beating-heart versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting for revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: Early outcomes. Can J Surg. 2013;56:398–404. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.018412.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Algranati D, Kassab GS, Lanir Y. Why is the subendocardium more vulnerable to ischemia? A new paradigm. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;300:H1090–H1100. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00473.2010.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vijayan S, Barmby DS, Pearson IR, Davies AG, Wheatcroft SB, Sivananthan M. Assessing coronary blood flow physiology in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2017;13:232–243. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X13666170525102618.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakajima H, Iguchi A, Tabata M, et al. Preserved autoregulation of coronary flow after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: retrospective assessment of intraoperative transit time flowmetry with and without intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;11:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-016-0550-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mo A, Lin H, Wen Z, Lu W, Long X, Zhou Y. Efficacy and safety of on-pump beating heart surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1914–1918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Buckberg GD. Left ventricular subendocardial necrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977;24:379–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(10)63418-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Mack MJ, Pfister A, Bachand D, et al. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.08.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sepehripour AH, Chaudhry UAR, Harling L, Athanasiou T. Off-pump or on-pump beating heart: which technique offers better outcomes following coronary revascularization? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20:546–549. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivu451.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pradeep Narayan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics committee approval

Was obtained from the institutional ethics committee (NHRTIICSEC/AP/2021/002) on the 4th of January 2021.

Human rights statement

The research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration.

Informed consent

As the study was a retrospective analysis of data, the need for individual patient consent was waived off.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, Y.M., Potdar, S., Das, D. et al. On-pump beating heart versus off-pump myocardial revascularization—a propensity-matched comparison. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 37, 639–646 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01209-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-021-01209-x

Keywords

Navigation