Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgical management of iatrogenic coronary artery perforations: when percutaneous treatment fails

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coronary perforation is a rare complication of percutaneous coronary interventions and a challenging scenario which imposes prompt recognition and treatment. Although it may be successfully managed percutaneously, a surgical treatment may be preferable in some cases. We report the case of a patient with a coronary perforation with initial percutaneous treatment complicated with extravascular implantation of a covered stent and liver laceration, who was succesfully treated by cardiac surgery. This case suggests the importance of the proximity of an onsite cardiac surgery center when complex coronary artery percutaneous interventions are performed in hospitals with offsite surgical support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lemmert ME, van Bommel RJ, Diletti R, et al. Clinical characteristics and management of coronary artery perforations: a single-center 11-year experience and practical overview. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e 007049. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.007049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ellis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation. 1994;90:2725–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Amat-Santos IJ, Martin-Yuste V, Fernández-Díaz JA, et al. Procedural, functional and prognostic outcomes following recanalization of coronary chronic total occlusions. Results of the Iberian registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2019;72:373–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Riley RF, Sapontis J, Kirtane AJ, et al. Prevalence, predictors, and health status implications of periprocedural complications during coronary chronic total occlusion angioplasty. EuroIntervention. 2018;14:e1199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Al-Lamee R, Ielasi A, Latib A, et al. Incidence, predictors, management, immediate and long-term outcomes following grade III coronary perforation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4:87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Briguori C, Nishida T, Anzuini A, Di Mario C, Grube E, Colombo A. Emergency polytetrafluoethylene-covered stent implantation to treat coronary ruptures. Circulation. 2000;102:3028–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lansky AJ, Yang YM, Khan Y, et al. Treatment of coronary artery perforations complicating percutaneous coronary intervention with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent graft. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:370–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Jamshidi P, Mahmoody K, Erne P. Covered stents: A review. Int J Cardiol. 2008;130:310–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeo KK, Rogers JH, Laird JR. Use of stent grafts and coils in vessel rupture and perforation. J Interv Cardiol. 2008;21:86–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pershad A, Yarkoni A, Biglari D. Management of distal coronary perforations. J Invasive Cardiol. 2008;20:E187–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ryan TJ, Faxon DP, Gunnar RM, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). Circulation. 1988;78:486–502.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bashore TM, Balter S, Barac A, et al. 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation/Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions expert consensus document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards update: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus documents developed in collaboration with the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society for Vascular Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2221–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlotta Brega.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was provided.

Consent

written consent was obtained from the patient involved.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

As it’s a retrospective case report, no ethical committee was required.

Statement of human and animal rights

This article is a case report regarding human participant and it does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(WMV 184 kb)

ESM 2

(WMV 254 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brega, C., Pisani, A., Braham, W. et al. Surgical management of iatrogenic coronary artery perforations: when percutaneous treatment fails. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 231–233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00900-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-019-00900-4

Keywords

Navigation