Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term decline in rainfall causing depletion in groundwater aquifer storage sustaining the springflow in the middle-Himalayan headwaters

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to study the cause and effect of the reported widespread decline in spring-flow from a catchment in the middle Himalaya in the Garhwal region. A range of statistical tests to the long rainfall data series is applied to the two gauge-based interpolated gridded data. A decline in annual and seasonal rainfall with a rising frequency of moderate to severe drought in the subseries (1961–2018) is observed compared to the first half of the 20th century. A sudden shift of declining trend is observed in IMD4 gridded data in the early to mid-sixties. Prolonged post-monsoon and winter recession characteristics are analysed through a single nonlinear model and a power-law model. The nonlinear model and event-based power-law recession analysis showed nonlinearity (B≠1) in a storage–discharge relationship at the spring catchment scale as well as the intercept (A) highlights a very fast-draining aquifer with a very short recession timescale. The log-transformed fitted single nonlinear modelled recession data revealed control of antecedent storage over the rate of outflow as parallel offset was observed in interannual prolonged recession curve in –dQ/dt vs. Q plot. Groundwater reservoir contributing to Ayal springflow is very vulnerable to reservoir storage changes.

Research highlights

  • In recent time, threat to water sustainability in middle Himalaya is widely reported. However, a clear understanding of the cause is not being investigated in a systematic manner.

  • The present study highlights that deficient monsoon years as well as dry winter months, are causing multi-year drought in middle Himalaya basins.

  • Higher frequency of moderate drought is observed in the long-term rainfall data after the early to mid-sixties and may have caused the decline in springflow.

  • Recession characteristics of springflow showed nonlinearity in storage–discharge relationship as well as very short recession time scale and springflow are extremely vulnerable to aquifer storage change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andermann C, Bonnet S and Gloaguen R 2011 Evaluation of precipitation data sets along the Himalayan front; Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 12(7).

  • Bart R and Hope A 2014 Inter-seasonal variability in baseflow recession rates: The role of aquifer antecedent storage in central California watersheds; J. Hydrol. 519 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee A, Dimri A P and Kumar K 2021 Temperature over the Himalayan foothill state of Uttarakhand: Present and future; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 130 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basistha A, Arya D S and Goel N K 2009 Analysis of historical changes in rainfall in the Indian Himalayas; Int. J. Climatol.: A J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 29(4) 555–572.

  • Berghuijs W R, Hartmann A and Woods R A 2016 Streamflow sensitivity to water storage changes across Europe; Geophys. Res. Lett. 43(5) 1980–1987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhardwaj A, Ziegler A D, Wasson R J and Chow W T 2017 Accuracy of rainfall estimates at high altitude in the Garhwal Himalaya (India): A comparison of secondary precipitation products and station rainfall measurements; Atmos. Res. 188 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhutiyani M R, Kale V S and Pawar N J 2007 Long-term trends in maximum, minimum and mean annual air temperatures across the Northwestern Himalaya during the twentieth century; Clim. Change 85(1) 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biswal B and Marani M 2010 Geomorphological origin of recession curves; Geophys. Res. Lett. 37(24), https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045415.

  • Biswal B and Nagesh Kumar D 2014 Study of dynamic behaviour of recession curves; Hydrol. Process. 28(3) 784–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollasina M A, Ming Y and Ramaswamy V 2011 Anthropogenic aerosols and the weakening of the South Asian summer monsoon; Science 334(6055) 502–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broecker W S 1997 Thermohaline circulation, the Achilles heel of our climate system: Will man-made CO2 upset the current balance?; Science 278(5343) 1582–1588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookhagen B and Burbank D W 2006 Topography, relief, and TRMM-derived rainfall variations along the Himalaya; Geophys. Res. Lett. 33(8).

  • Brutsaert W 2008 Long‐term groundwater storage trends estimated from streamflow records: Climatic perspective; Water Resour. Res. 44(2).

  • Brutsaert W and Lopez J P 1998 Basin-scale geohydrologic drought flow features of riparian aquifers in the Southern Great Plains; Water Resour. Res. 34(2) 233–240, https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR03068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brutsaert W and Nieber J L 1977 Regionalised drought flow hydrographs from a mature glaciated plateau; Water Resour. Res. 13(3) 637–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buishand T A 1982 Some methods for testing the homogeneity of rainfall records; J. Hydrol. 58(1–2) 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B and Krajewski W F 2015 Recession analysis across scales: The impact of both random and nonrandom spatial variability on aggregated hydrologic response; J. Hydrol. 523 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung C E and Ramanathan V 2006 Weakening of North Indian SST gradients and the monsoon rainfall in India and the Sahel; J. Clim. 19(10) 2036–2045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark M P, Rupp D E, Woods R A, Tromp-van Meerveld H J, Peters N E and Freer J E 2009 Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: Linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale; Hydrol. Process. 23(2) 311–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das L, Dutta M, Mezghani A and Benestad R E 2018 Use of observed temperature statistics in ranking CMIP5 model performance over the Western Himalayan Region of India; Int. J. Climatol. 38(2) 554–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash S K, Nair A A, Kulkarni M A and Mohanty U C 2011 Characteristic changes in the long and short spells of different rain intensities in India; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 105(3–4) 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deming D 1999 On the possible influence of extra-terrestrial volatiles on Earth’s climate and the origin of the oceans; Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 146(1–4) 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewandel B, Lachassagne P, Bakalowicz M, Weng P H and Al-Malki A 2003 Evaluation of aquifer thickness by analysing recession hydrographs: Application to the Oman ophiolite hard-rock aquifer; J. Hydrol. 274(1–4) 248–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dralle D, Karst N and Thompson S E 2015 a, b careful: The challenge of scale invariance for comparative analyses in power law models of the streamflow recession; Geophys. Res. Lett. 42(21) 9285–9293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dralle D N, Karst N J, Charalampous K, Veenstra A and Thompson S E 2017 Event-scale power law recession analysis: Quantifying methodological uncertainty; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21(1) 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D K, Wang D and Zhu T 2016 On the transition of base flow recession from early stage to late stage; Adv. Water Resour. 88 8–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guhathakurta P and Rajeevan M 2008 Trends in the rainfall pattern over India; Int. J. Climatol.: J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 28(11) 1453–1469.

  • Guhathakurtha P, Bandgar A, Menon P, Prasad A K, Sable S T and Sangwan N 2020 Observed Rainfall Variability and Changes over Uttarakhand State; Met. Monograph No. 52. ESSO/IMD/HS/Rainfall Variability/28.

  • Hall F R 1968 Base-flow recession – a review; Water Resourc. Res. 4 973–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamal K, Sharma S, Baniya B, Khadka N and Zhou X 2020 Inter-annual variability of winter precipitation over Nepal coupled with ocean-atmospheric patterns during 1987–2015; Front. Earth Sci. 8 161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman C J, Sivapalan M and Kumar P 2009 Power law catchment‐scale recessions arising from heterogeneous linear small‐scale dynamics; Water Resourc. Res. 45(9).

  • Hirsch R M and Slack J R 1984 A nonparametric trend test for seasonal data with serial dependence; Water Resourc. Res. 20(6) 727–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jachens E R, Rupp D E, Roques C and Selker J S 2020 Recession analysis revisited: Impacts of climate on parameter estimation; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 24(3) 1159–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Q and Wang C 2017 A revival of Indian summer monsoon rainfall since 2002; Nat. Clim. Change 7(8) 587–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen R H, Bishop K, Grabs T, Ottosson-Löfvenius M, Laudon H and Seibert J 2019 The role of landscape properties, storage and evapotranspiration on variability in streamflow recessions in a boreal catchment; J. Hydrol. 570 315–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M G 1975 Rank Correlation Methods; Charles Griffin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khandelwal D D, Gupta A K and Chauhan V 2015 Observations of rainfall in Garhwal Himalaya, India during 2008–2013 and its correlation with TRMM data; Curr. Sci. 108(6) 1146–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchner J W 2009 Catchments as simple dynamical systems: Catchment characterisation, rainfall‐runoff modeling, and doing hydrology backward; Water Resourc. Res. 45(2).

  • Kothawale D R and Rupa Kumar K 2005 On the recent changes in surface temperature trends over India; Geophys. Res. Lett. 32(18).

  • Krishnan R, Sabin T P, Vellore R, Mujumdar M, Sanjay J, Goswami B N, Hourdin F, Dufresne J L and Terray P 2016 Deciphering the desiccation trend of the South Asian monsoon hydroclimate in a warming world; Clim. Dyn. 47(3) 1007–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Hodnebrog Ø, Daloz A S, Sen S, Badiger S and Krishnaswamy J 2021 Measuring precipitation in Eastern Himalaya: Ground validation of eleven satellite, model and gauge interpolated gridded products; J. Hydrol. 599 126252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K N, Rajeevan M, Pai D S, Srivastava A K and Preethi B 2013 On the observed variability of monsoon droughts over India; Wea. Clim. Extreme. 1 42–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar N, Yadav B P, Gahlot S and Singh M 2015 Winter frequency of western disturbances and precipitation indices over Himachal Pradesh, India: 1977–2007; Atmósfera 28(1) 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann H B 1945 Nonparametric tests against trend; Econometrica: J. Economet. Soc. 13(3) 245–259.

  • Machiwal D and Jha M K 2012 Hydrologic time series analysis: Theory and practice; Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Malvicini C F, Steenhuis T S, Walter M T, Parlange J Y and Walter M F 2005 Evaluation of spring flow in the uplands of Matalom, Leyte, Philippines; Adv. Water Resour. 28(10) 1083–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens B, Miralles D G, Lievens H, Van Der Schalie R, De Jeu R A, Fernández-Prieto D, Beck H E, Dorigo W A and Verhoest N E 2017 GLEAM v3: Satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture; Geosci. Model Dev. 10(5) 1903–1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meher J K, Das L, Benestad R E and Mezghani A 2018 Analysis of winter rainfall change statistics over the Western Himalaya: The influence of internal variability and topography; Int. J. Climatol. 38 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee T B, Doesken N J and Kleist J 1993 The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales; Proc. 8th Conference on Applied Climatology 17(22) 179–183.

  • Miralles D G, Holmes T R H, de Jeu R A M, Gash J H, Meesters A G C A and Dolman A J 2011 Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 453–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S 2013 Extra-terrestrial influence on climate change; Springer, India,, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0730-6_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee S, Joshi R, Prasad R C, Vishvakarma S C and Kumar K 2015 Summer monsoon rainfall trends in the Indian Himalayan region; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 121(3) 789–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pai D S, Sridhar L, Rajeevan M, Sreejith O P, Satbhai N S and Mukhopadhyay B 2014 Development of a new high spatial resolution (0.25 × 0.25) long period (1901–2010) daily gridded rainfall data set over India and its comparison with existing data sets over the region; Mausam 65(1) 1–18.

  • Pai D S, Sridhar L, Guhathakurta P and Hatwar H R 2011 District-wide drought climatology of the southwest monsoon season over India based on standardised precipitation index (SPI); Nat. Hazards 59(3) 1797–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy B and Dhar O N 1976 A study of trends and periodicities in the seasonal and annual rainfall of India; Mausam 27(1) 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy B and Mooley D A 1978 Some features of a long homogeneous series of Indian summer monsoon rainfall; Mon. Wea. Rev. 106 771–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy B 1984 Interannual and long-term variability of Indian summer monsoon rainfall; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Earth Planet. Sci. 93(4) 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik S, Biswal B, Nagesh Kumar D and Sivakumar B 2015 Effect of catchment characteristics on the relationship between past discharge and the power law recession coefficient; J. Hydrol. 528 321–328, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettitt A N 1979 A nonparametric approach to the change‐point problem; J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. C (Appl. Stat.) 28(2) 126–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramanathan V, Chung C, Kim D, Bettge T, Buja L, Kiehl J T, Washington W M, Fu Q, Sikka D R and Wild M 2005 Atmospheric brown clouds: Impacts on South Asian climate and hydrological cycle; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(15) 5326–5333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RCore TEAM 2016 R: A language and environment for statistical computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

  • Roques C, Rupp D E and Selker J S 2017 Improved streamflow recession parameter estimation with attention to calculation of −dQ/dt; Adv. Water Resourc. 108 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxy M K, Ritika K, Terray P, Murtugudde R, Ashok K and Goswami B N 2015 Drying of Indian subcontinent by rapid Indian Ocean warming and a weakening land–sea thermal gradient; Nature Commun. 6(1) 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxy M K 2017 Land warming revives monsoon; Nat. Clim. Change 7(8) 549–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabin T P, Krishnan R, Vellore R, Priya P, Borgaonkar H P, Singh B B and Sagar A 2020 Climate change over the Himalayas. Assessment of climate change over the Indian region; A report of the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India, pp. 207–222.

  • Sánchez-Murillo R, Brooks E S, Elliot W J and Boll J 2015 Isotope hydrology and baseflow geochemistry in natural and human-altered watersheds in the Inland Pacific Northwest USA; Isot. Environ. Health Stud. 51(2) 231–254, https://doi.org/10.1080/10256016.2015.1008468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawaske S R and Freyberg D L 2014 An analysis of trends in baseflow recession and low-flows in rain-dominated coastal streams of the Pacific coast; J. Hydrol. 519 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen P K 1968 Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau; J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 63(324) 1379–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şen Z 2012 Innovative trend analysis methodology; J. Hydrol. Eng. 17(9) 1042–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh K P and Stall J B 1971 Derivation of base flow recession curves and parameters; Water Resourc. Res. 7(2) 292–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw S B and Riha S J 2012 Examining individual recession events instead of a data cloud: Using a modified interpretation of dQ/dt–Q streamflow recession in glaciated watersheds to better inform models of low flow; J. Hydrol. 434 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonali P and Kumar D N 2013 Review of trend detection methods and their application to detect temperature changes in India; J. Hydrol. 476 212–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneyers R 1990 Technical note No. 143 on the statistical analysis of series of observations; World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

  • Srivastava A K, Rajeevan M and Kshirsagar S R 2009 Development of a high resolution daily gridded temperature data set (1969–2005) for the Indian region; Atmos. Sci. Lett. 10(4) 249–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stölzle M, Stahl K and Weiler M 2013 Are streamflow recession characteristics really characteristic?; Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17(2) 817–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallaksen L M 1995 A review of baseflow recession analysis; J. Hydrol. 165 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tague C and Grant G E 2004 A geological framework for interpreting the low‐flow regimes of Cascade streams, Willamette River Basin, Oregon; Water Resourc. Res. 40(4).

  • Tarafdar S 2013 Understanding the dynamics of high and low spring flow: A key to managing the water resources in a small urbanised hillslope of Lesser Himalaya, India; Environ. Earth Sci. 70(5) 2107–2114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar S 2016 The study of spatial distribution of precipitation and stable isotope content in a mountainous watershed of the Mid-Himalaya, Northern India from short-term records of monsoon period; J. Hydrogeol. Hydrol. Eng. 5, https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9647.1000138.

  • Tarafdar S, Bruijnzeel L A and Kumar B 2019 Improved understanding of spring and stream water responses in headwaters of the Indian lesser Himalaya using stable isotopes, conductivity and temperature as tracers; Hydrol. Sci. J. 64(7) 757–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashie A, Scaife C I and Band L E 2019 Transpiration and subsurface controls of streamflow recession characteristics; Hydrol. Process. 33(19) 2561–2575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashie A, Pavelsky T and Emanuel R E 2020 Spatial and temporal patterns in baseflow recession in the continental United States; Water Resourc. Res. 56(3).

  • Toebes C and Strang D D 1964 On recession curves. 1: Recession equations; J. Hydrol. 3(2) 2–15.

  • Troch P A, Berne A, Bogaart P, Harman C, Hilberts A G, Lyon S W, Paniconi C, Pauwels V R, Rupp D E, Selker J S and Teuling A J 2013 The importance of hydraulic groundwater theory in catchment hydrology: The legacy of Wilfried Brutsaert and Jean-Yves Parlange; Water Resourc. Res. 49(9) 5099–5116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente-Serrano S M, Beguería S and López-Moreno J I 2010 A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: The standardised precipitation evapotranspiration index; J. Climate 23(7) 1696–1718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang D 2011 On the base flow recession at the Panola mountain research watershed, Georgia, United States; Water Resourc. Res. 47(3).

  • Wang S Y, Yoon J H, Gillies R R and Cho C 2013 What caused the winter drought in western Nepal during recent years?; J. Climate 26(21) 8241–8256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werner P W and Sundquist K J 1951 On the groundwater recession curve for large watersheds; IAHS Publ. 33 202–212.

  • Wittenberg H and Sivapalan M 1999 Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation; J. Hydrol. 219(1–2).

  • World Meteorological Organisation 1966 Climatic change; WMO Tech. Note No. 79, WMO No. 195, TP-100, 80p.

  • Yadav R K, Kumar K R and Rajeevan M 2012 Characteristic features of winter precipitation and its variability over northwest India; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 121(3) 611–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yatagai A, Kamiguchi K, Arakawa O, Hamada A, Yasutomi N and Kitoh A 2012 APHRODITE: Constructing a long-term daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93(9) 1401–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to South Asian Water Initiative (SAWI-ICIMOD), Space Application Centre–ISRO (Pracriti-Phase-II), National Mission on Himalayan Studies (NMHS), Forest & Climate Change (MoEF&CC, NMHS-Spring rejuvenation), New Delhi Nodal and serving hub with G.B. Pant National Institute of Himalayan Environment & Sustainable Development (GBPNIHESD), Almora, Uttarakhand for providing the funding and research facilities during this research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The manuscript is an outcome of PhD research work carried out by the first author under the supervision of second author. Field work, data analysis and manuscript writing were done by the first author, edited and reviewed by the second author.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soukhin Tarafdar.

Additional information

Communicated by Somnath Dasgupta

Supplementary material pertaining to this article is available on the Journal of Earth System Science website (http://www.ias.ac.in/Journals/Journal_of_Earth_System_Science).

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 92 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tarafdar, S., Dutta, S. Long-term decline in rainfall causing depletion in groundwater aquifer storage sustaining the springflow in the middle-Himalayan headwaters. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02136-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02136-8

Keywords

Navigation